ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

How do I correctly clone a JavaScript object?

I have an object x. I'd like to copy it as object y, such that changes to y do not modify x. I realized that copying objects derived from built-in JavaScript objects will result in extra, unwanted properties. This isn't a problem, since I'm copying one of my own literal-constructed objects.

How do I correctly clone a JavaScript object?

For JSON, I use mObj=JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(jsonObject));
I really don't get why no one suggests Object.create(o), it does everything the author asks?
var x = { deep: { key: 1 } }; var y = Object.create(x); x.deep.key = 2; After doing this, y.deep.key will also be 2, hence Object.create CAN NOT BE USED for cloning...
@r3wt that will not work... Please post only after doing basic test of the solution..

V
Vitaly Zdanevich

2022 update

There's a new JS standard called structured cloning. It works on all browsers:

const clone = structuredClone(object);

Old answer

To do this for any object in JavaScript will not be simple or straightforward. You will run into the problem of erroneously picking up attributes from the object's prototype that should be left in the prototype and not copied to the new instance. If, for instance, you are adding a clone method to Object.prototype, as some answers depict, you will need to explicitly skip that attribute. But what if there are other additional methods added to Object.prototype, or other intermediate prototypes, that you don't know about? In that case, you will copy attributes you shouldn't, so you need to detect unforeseen, non-local attributes with the hasOwnProperty method.

In addition to non-enumerable attributes, you'll encounter a tougher problem when you try to copy objects that have hidden properties. For example, prototype is a hidden property of a function. Also, an object's prototype is referenced with the attribute __proto__, which is also hidden, and will not be copied by a for/in loop iterating over the source object's attributes. I think __proto__ might be specific to Firefox's JavaScript interpreter and it may be something different in other browsers, but you get the picture. Not everything is enumerable. You can copy a hidden attribute if you know its name, but I don't know of any way to discover it automatically.

Yet another snag in the quest for an elegant solution is the problem of setting up the prototype inheritance correctly. If your source object's prototype is Object, then simply creating a new general object with {} will work, but if the source's prototype is some descendant of Object, then you are going to be missing the additional members from that prototype which you skipped using the hasOwnProperty filter, or which were in the prototype, but weren't enumerable in the first place. One solution might be to call the source object's constructor property to get the initial copy object and then copy over the attributes, but then you still will not get non-enumerable attributes. For example, a Date object stores its data as a hidden member:

function clone(obj) {
    if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj;
    var copy = obj.constructor();
    for (var attr in obj) {
        if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = obj[attr];
    }
    return copy;
}

var d1 = new Date();

/* Executes function after 5 seconds. */
setTimeout(function(){
    var d2 = clone(d1);
    alert("d1 = " + d1.toString() + "\nd2 = " + d2.toString());
}, 5000);

The date string for d1 will be 5 seconds behind that of d2. A way to make one Date the same as another is by calling the setTime method, but that is specific to the Date class. I don't think there is a bullet-proof general solution to this problem, though I would be happy to be wrong!

When I had to implement general deep copying I ended up compromising by assuming that I would only need to copy a plain Object, Array, Date, String, Number, or Boolean. The last 3 types are immutable, so I could perform a shallow copy and not worry about it changing. I further assumed that any elements contained in Object or Array would also be one of the 6 simple types in that list. This can be accomplished with code like the following:

function clone(obj) {
    var copy;

    // Handle the 3 simple types, and null or undefined
    if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj;

    // Handle Date
    if (obj instanceof Date) {
        copy = new Date();
        copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
        return copy;
    }

    // Handle Array
    if (obj instanceof Array) {
        copy = [];
        for (var i = 0, len = obj.length; i < len; i++) {
            copy[i] = clone(obj[i]);
        }
        return copy;
    }

    // Handle Object
    if (obj instanceof Object) {
        copy = {};
        for (var attr in obj) {
            if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = clone(obj[attr]);
        }
        return copy;
    }

    throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
}

The above function will work adequately for the 6 simple types I mentioned, as long as the data in the objects and arrays form a tree structure. That is, there isn't more than one reference to the same data in the object. For example:

// This would be cloneable:
var tree = {
    "left"  : { "left" : null, "right" : null, "data" : 3 },
    "right" : null,
    "data"  : 8
};

// This would kind-of work, but you would get 2 copies of the 
// inner node instead of 2 references to the same copy
var directedAcylicGraph = {
    "left"  : { "left" : null, "right" : null, "data" : 3 },
    "data"  : 8
};
directedAcyclicGraph["right"] = directedAcyclicGraph["left"];

// Cloning this would cause a stack overflow due to infinite recursion:
var cyclicGraph = {
    "left"  : { "left" : null, "right" : null, "data" : 3 },
    "data"  : 8
};
cyclicGraph["right"] = cyclicGraph;

It will not be able to handle any JavaScript object, but it may be sufficient for many purposes as long as you don't assume that it will just work for anything you throw at it.


This is missing symbol keys and symbol values. Nowadays, using Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors is better.
structuredClone is only 75% compatible globally
In Nodejs, structuredClone(object) works for node v17.0.0 and later.
Update on @JoshuaDavid, currently supported in 82.57% of all browsers.
T
TOPKAT

If you do not use Dates, functions, undefined, regExp or Infinity within your object, a very simple one liner is JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(object)):

const a = { string: 'string', number: 123, bool: false, nul: null, date: new Date(), // stringified undef: undefined, // lost inf: Infinity, // forced to 'null' } console.log(a); console.log(typeof a.date); // Date object const clone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a)); console.log(clone); console.log(typeof clone.date); // result of .toISOString()

This works for all kind of objects containing objects, arrays, strings, booleans and numbers.

See also this article about the structured clone algorithm of browsers which is used when posting messages to and from a worker. It also contains a function for deep cloning.


sometimes the best answers are the simplest. genius.
Helpful, but when comparing objects which contains other objects, I ran through unexpected behaviour when two exactly equal objects where not taken as equals. used JSON.stringify(x) == JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a))) to fix it. For some reason, comparing as strings works perfectly as expected when comparing, could not match otherwise.
@AgustinL.Lacuara You cannot compare complex datatypes in JS. a={};b={}; a==b is false. But after a=b it becomes true, because it is not only identical but it is the same object.
does the job, but, this is goes against any good programming practice. In brazil, we call that a 'Gambiarra'
b
buræquete

With jQuery, you can shallow copy with extend:

var copiedObject = jQuery.extend({}, originalObject)

subsequent changes to the copiedObject will not affect the originalObject, and vice versa.

Or to make a deep copy:

var copiedObject = jQuery.extend(true, {}, originalObject)

m
mikemaccana

In ECMAScript 6 there is Object.assign method, which copies values of all enumerable own properties from one object to another. For example:

var x = {myProp: "value"};
var y = Object.assign({}, x); 

But be aware this is a shallow copy - nested objects are still copied as reference.


E
Efren

Per MDN:

If you want shallow copy, use Object.assign({}, a)

For "deep" copy, use JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a))

There is no need for external libraries but you need to check browser compatibility first.


i
itpastorn

There are many answers, but none that mentions Object.create from ECMAScript 5, which admittedly does not give you an exact copy, but sets the source as the prototype of the new object.

Thus, this is not an exact answer to the question, but it is a one-line solution and thus elegant. And it works best for 2 cases:

Where such inheritance is useful (duh!) Where the source object won't be modified, thus making the relation between the 2 objects a non issue.

Example:

var foo = { a : 1 };
var bar = Object.create(foo);
foo.a; // 1
bar.a; // 1
foo.a = 2;
bar.a; // 2 - prototype changed
bar.a = 3;
foo.a; // Still 2, since setting bar.a makes it an "own" property

Why do I consider this solution to be superior? It's native, thus no looping, no recursion. However, older browsers will need a polyfill.


This is prototypal inheritance, not cloning. These are completely different things. The new object doesn't have any of it's own properties, it just points to the prototype's properties. The point of cloning is to create a fresh new object that doesn't reference any properties in another object.
C
Community

An elegant way to clone a Javascript object in one line of code

An Object.assign method is part of the ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) standard and does exactly what you need.

var clone = Object.assign({}, obj);

The Object.assign() method is used to copy the values of all enumerable own properties from one or more source objects to a target object.

Read more...

The polyfill to support older browsers:

if (!Object.assign) {
  Object.defineProperty(Object, 'assign', {
    enumerable: false,
    configurable: true,
    writable: true,
    value: function(target) {
      'use strict';
      if (target === undefined || target === null) {
        throw new TypeError('Cannot convert first argument to object');
      }

      var to = Object(target);
      for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
        var nextSource = arguments[i];
        if (nextSource === undefined || nextSource === null) {
          continue;
        }
        nextSource = Object(nextSource);

        var keysArray = Object.keys(nextSource);
        for (var nextIndex = 0, len = keysArray.length; nextIndex < len; nextIndex++) {
          var nextKey = keysArray[nextIndex];
          var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(nextSource, nextKey);
          if (desc !== undefined && desc.enumerable) {
            to[nextKey] = nextSource[nextKey];
          }
        }
      }
      return to;
    }
  });
}

this will only perform a shallow "cloning"
I learned the hard way that objA = objB; causes all kinds of headaches. This seems to have solved the problem, at least for now...
t
tgogos

There are several issues with most solutions on the internet. So I decided to make a follow-up, which includes, why the accepted answer shouldn't be accepted.

starting situation

I want to deep-copy a Javascript Object with all of its children and their children and so on. But since I'm not kind of a normal developer, my Object has normal properties, circular structures and even nested objects.

So let's create a circular structure and a nested object first.

function Circ() {
    this.me = this;
}

function Nested(y) {
    this.y = y;
}

Let's bring everything together in an Object named a.

var a = {
    x: 'a',
    circ: new Circ(),
    nested: new Nested('a')
};

Next, we want to copy a into a variable named b and mutate it.

var b = a;

b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';

You know what happened here because if not you wouldn't even land on this great question.

console.log(a, b);

a --> Object {
    x: "b",
    circ: Circ {
        me: Circ { ... }
    },
    nested: Nested {
        y: "b"
    }
}

b --> Object {
    x: "b",
    circ: Circ {
        me: Circ { ... }
    },
    nested: Nested {
        y: "b"
    }
}

Now let's find a solution.

JSON

The first attempt I tried was using JSON.

var b = JSON.parse( JSON.stringify( a ) );

b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';

Don't waste too much time on it, you'll get TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON.

Recursive copy (the accepted "answer")

Let's have a look at the accepted answer.

function cloneSO(obj) {
    // Handle the 3 simple types, and null or undefined
    if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj;

    // Handle Date
    if (obj instanceof Date) {
        var copy = new Date();
        copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
        return copy;
    }

    // Handle Array
    if (obj instanceof Array) {
        var copy = [];
        for (var i = 0, len = obj.length; i < len; i++) {
            copy[i] = cloneSO(obj[i]);
        }
        return copy;
    }

    // Handle Object
    if (obj instanceof Object) {
        var copy = {};
        for (var attr in obj) {
            if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = cloneSO(obj[attr]);
        }
        return copy;
    }

    throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
}

Looks good, heh? It's a recursive copy of the object and handles other types as well, like Date, but that wasn't a requirement.

var b = cloneSO(a);

b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';

Recursion and circular structures doesn't work well together... RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

native solution

After arguing with my co-worker, my boss asked us what happened, and he found a simple solution after some googling. It's called Object.create.

var b = Object.create(a);

b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';

This solution was added to Javascript some time ago and even handles circular structure.

console.log(a, b);

a --> Object {
    x: "a",
    circ: Circ {
        me: Circ { ... }
    },
    nested: Nested {
        y: "b"
    }
}

b --> Object {
    x: "b",
    circ: Circ {
        me: Circ { ... }
    },
    nested: Nested {
        y: "b"
    }
}

... and you see, it didn't work with the nested structure inside.

polyfill for the native solution

There's a polyfill for Object.create in the older browser just like the IE 8. It's something like recommended by Mozilla, and of course, it's not perfect and results in the same problem as the native solution.

function F() {};
function clonePF(o) {
    F.prototype = o;
    return new F();
}

var b = clonePF(a);

b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';

I've put F outside the scope so we can have a look at what instanceof tells us.

console.log(a, b);

a --> Object {
    x: "a",
    circ: Circ {
        me: Circ { ... }
    },
    nested: Nested {
        y: "b"
    }
}

b --> F {
    x: "b",
    circ: Circ {
        me: Circ { ... }
    },
    nested: Nested {
        y: "b"
    }
}

console.log(typeof a, typeof b);

a --> object
b --> object

console.log(a instanceof Object, b instanceof Object);

a --> true
b --> true

console.log(a instanceof F, b instanceof F);

a --> false
b --> true

Same problem as the native solution, but a little bit worse output.

the better (but not perfect) solution

When digging around, I found a similar question (In Javascript, when performing a deep copy, how do I avoid a cycle, due to a property being "this"?) to this one, but with a way better solution.

function cloneDR(o) {
    const gdcc = "__getDeepCircularCopy__";
    if (o !== Object(o)) {
        return o; // primitive value
    }

    var set = gdcc in o,
        cache = o[gdcc],
        result;
    if (set && typeof cache == "function") {
        return cache();
    }
    // else
    o[gdcc] = function() { return result; }; // overwrite
    if (o instanceof Array) {
        result = [];
        for (var i=0; i<o.length; i++) {
            result[i] = cloneDR(o[i]);
        }
    } else {
        result = {};
        for (var prop in o)
            if (prop != gdcc)
                result[prop] = cloneDR(o[prop]);
            else if (set)
                result[prop] = cloneDR(cache);
    }
    if (set) {
        o[gdcc] = cache; // reset
    } else {
        delete o[gdcc]; // unset again
    }
    return result;
}

var b = cloneDR(a);

b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';

And let's have a look at the output...

console.log(a, b);

a --> Object {
    x: "a",
    circ: Object {
        me: Object { ... }
    },
    nested: Object {
        y: "a"
    }
}

b --> Object {
    x: "b",
    circ: Object {
        me: Object { ... }
    },
    nested: Object {
        y: "b"
    }
}

console.log(typeof a, typeof b);

a --> object
b --> object

console.log(a instanceof Object, b instanceof Object);

a --> true
b --> true

console.log(a instanceof F, b instanceof F);

a --> false
b --> false

The requirements are matched, but there are still some smaller issues, including changing the instance of nested and circ to Object.

The structure of trees that share a leaf won't be copied, they will become two independent leaves:

        [Object]                     [Object]
         /    \                       /    \
        /      \                     /      \
      |/_      _\|                 |/_      _\|  
  [Object]    [Object]   ===>  [Object]    [Object]
       \        /                 |           |
        \      /                  |           |
        _\|  |/_                 \|/         \|/
        [Object]               [Object]    [Object]

conclusion

The last solution using recursion and a cache, may not be the best, but it's a real deep-copy of the object. It handles simple properties, circular structures and nested object, but it will mess up the instance of them while cloning.

jsfiddle


so the conlcusion is to avoid that problem :)
@mikus until there's a real specification which covers more than just the basic use cases, yes.
An okay analysis of the solutions provided above but the conclusion drawn by the author indicates that there is no solution to this question.
It is shame that JS not includes native clone function.
Among all the top answers, I feel this is close to the correct one.
N
Nadeem Yasin

If you're okay with a shallow copy, the underscore.js library has a clone method.

y = _.clone(x);

or you can extend it like

copiedObject = _.extend({},originalObject);

Thanks. Using this technique on a Meteor server.
To get started quickly with lodash, I'd recommend learning npm, Browserify, as well as lodash. I got clone to work with 'npm i --save lodash.clone' and then 'var clone = require('lodash.clone');' To get require to work, you need something like browserify. Once you install it and learn how it works, you’ll use 'browserify yourfile.js > bundle.js;start chrome index.html' every time you run your code (instead of going into Chrome directly). This gathers your file and all the files you required from the npm module into bundle.js. You can probably save time and automate this step with Gulp though.
A
Alireza

OK, imagine you have this object below and you want to clone it:

let obj = {a:1, b:2, c:3}; //ES6

or

var obj = {a:1, b:2, c:3}; //ES5

the answer is mainly depeneds on which ECMAscript you using, in ES6+, you can simply use Object.assign to do the clone:

let cloned = Object.assign({}, obj); //new {a:1, b:2, c:3};

or using spread operator like this:

let cloned = {...obj}; //new {a:1, b:2, c:3};

But if you using ES5, you can use few methods, but the JSON.stringify, just make sure you not using for a big chunk of data to copy, but it could be one line handy way in many cases, something like this:

let cloned = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)); 
//new {a:1, b:2, c:3};, can be handy, but avoid using on big chunk of data over and over

Can you please give example of what big chunk of data would equate to? 100kb? 100MB? Thanks!
Yes, @user1063287, that basically the bigger data, the performnce worse... so it really depends, not a kb, mb or gb, it's more about how many times you wanna do that also... Also it won't work for functions and other stuffs...
Object.assign makes a shallow copy (just as the spread, @Alizera)
You can't use let in es5 :^) @Alireza
N
Nimantha

Update 06 July 2020

There are three (3) ways to clone objects in JavaScript. As objects in JavaScript are reference values, you can't simply just copy using the =.

The ways are:

const food = { food: 'apple', drink: 'milk' }


// 1. Using the "Spread"
// ------------------

{ ...food }


// 2. Using "Object.assign"
// ------------------

Object.assign({}, food)


// 3. "JSON"
// ------------------

JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(food))

// RESULT:
// { food: 'apple', drink: 'milk' }

This can be used as a reference summary.


And this adds what new/unique information to this question?
The JSON approach would remove any methods of the object
To create a string from an object and then parsing that string into another object just to copy the object is a kind of Monty Python's style of programming :-D
This only works for object literals and objects that can be represented as such, but not for generic "objects" like you encounter in OO languages. This seems to be what the OP asked for thus that's OK, but it' not a universal solution for every kind of object.
The spread operator and Object.assign fail for objects with a hierarchy, ie. nested objects. JSON.parse/stringify works, but as mentioned does not copy methods.
T
Tim

One particularly inelegant solution is to use JSON encoding to make deep copies of objects that do not have member methods. The methodology is to JSON encode your target object, then by decoding it, you get the copy you are looking for. You can decode as many times as you want to make as many copies as you need.

Of course, functions do not belong in JSON, so this only works for objects without member methods.

This methodology was perfect for my use case, since I'm storing JSON blobs in a key-value store, and when they are exposed as objects in a JavaScript API, each object actually contains a copy of the original state of the object so we can calculate the delta after the caller has mutated the exposed object.

var object1 = {key:"value"};
var object2 = object1;

object2 = JSON.stringify(object1);
object2 = JSON.parse(object2);

object2.key = "a change";
console.log(object1);// returns value

Why don't functions belong to JSON? I've seen them transfered as JSON more then once...
Functions are not part of the JSON spec becuase they are not a secure (or smart) way to transfer data, which is what JSON was made for. I know the native JSON encoder in Firefox simply ignores functions passed to it, but I'm not sure about the behavior of others.
@mark: { 'foo': function() { return 1; } } is a literal-constructed object.
@abarnert functions are not data. "Function literals" is a misnomer - since functions can contain arbitrary code, including assignments and all sort of "non-serializable" things.
m
musemind

You can simply use a spread property to copy an object without references. But be careful (see comments), the 'copy' is just on the lowest object/array level. Nested properties are still references!

Complete clone:

let x = {a: 'value1'}
let x2 = {...x}

// => mutate without references:

x2.a = 'value2'
console.log(x.a)    // => 'value1'

Clone with references on second level:

const y = {a: {b: 'value3'}}
const y2 = {...y}

// => nested object is still a references:

y2.a.b = 'value4'
console.log(y.a.b)    // => 'value4'

JavaScript actually does not support deep clones natively. Use an utility function. For example Ramda:

http://ramdajs.com/docs/#clone


This not working... it would work probably when x will be an array for instance x= [ 'ab','cd',...]
This works, but bear in mind this is a SHALLOW copy, therefore any deep references to others objects remain references!
A partial clone can also happen in this way: const first = {a: 'foo', b: 'bar'}; const second = {...{a} = first}
P
Pavan Garre
const objClone = { ...obj };

Be aware that nested objects are still copied as a reference.


Thanks for the hint that nested objects are still copied as a reference! I almost got crazy when debugging my code because I modified nested properties on the "clone" but the original got modified.
This is ES2016, not 2018, and this answer was given two years earlier.
so what if i want copy of nested property as well
@SunilGarg To copy nested property as well you can use const objDeepClone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
T
The Red Pea

From this article: How to copy arrays and objects in Javascript by Brian Huisman:

Object.prototype.clone = function() {
  var newObj = (this instanceof Array) ? [] : {};
  for (var i in this) {
    if (i == 'clone') continue;
    if (this[i] && typeof this[i] == "object") {
      newObj[i] = this[i].clone();
    } else newObj[i] = this[i]
  } return newObj;
};

This is close, but doesn't work for any object. Try cloning a Date object with this. Not all properties are enumerable, so they will not all show up in the for/in loop.
Adding to the object prototype like this broke jQuery for me. Even when I renamed to clone2.
@iPadDeveloper2011 The code above had a bug in it where it created a global variable called 'i' '(for i in this)', rather than '(for var i in this)'. I have enough karma to edit and it and fix it so I did.
@Calvin: this should be created an a non-enumerable property, otherwise 'clone' will appear in 'for' loops.
why isn't var copiedObj = Object.create(obj); a great way as well?
L
Lukas Jelinek

For those using AngularJS, there is also direct method for cloning or extending of the objects in this library.

var destination = angular.copy(source);

or

angular.copy(source, destination);

More in angular.copy documentation...


This is a deep copy FYI.
N
Nimantha
function clone(obj) {
    if(obj == null || typeof(obj) != 'object')
        return obj;    
    var temp = new obj.constructor(); 
    for(var key in obj)
        temp[key] = clone(obj[key]);    
    return temp;
}

This answer is pretty close, but not quite correct. If you try cloning a Date object, you will not get the same date because the call to the Date constructor function initializes the new Date with the current date/time. That value isn't enumerable and won't be copied by the for/in loop.
Not perfect, but nice for those basic cases. E.g. allowing simple cloning of an argument that can be a basic Object, Array or String.
Upvoted for correctly calling the constructor using new. The accepted answer does not.
works on node everything else ! still left reference links
The recursive thought is great.But If the value is array,it will work?
J
Jan Turoň

A.Levy's answer is almost complete, here is my little contribution: there is a way how to handle recursive references, see this line

if(this[attr]==this) copy[attr] = copy;

If the object is XML DOM element, we must use cloneNode instead

if(this.cloneNode) return this.cloneNode(true);

Inspired by A.Levy's exhaustive study and Calvin's prototyping approach, I offer this solution:

Object.prototype.clone = function() {
  if(this.cloneNode) return this.cloneNode(true);
  var copy = this instanceof Array ? [] : {};
  for(var attr in this) {
    if(typeof this[attr] == "function" || this[attr]==null || !this[attr].clone)
      copy[attr] = this[attr];
    else if(this[attr]==this) copy[attr] = copy;
    else copy[attr] = this[attr].clone();
  }
  return copy;
}

Date.prototype.clone = function() {
  var copy = new Date();
  copy.setTime(this.getTime());
  return copy;
}

Number.prototype.clone = 
Boolean.prototype.clone =
String.prototype.clone = function() {
  return this;
}

See also Andy Burke's note in the answers.


Date.prototype.clone = function() {return new Date(+this)};
K
Kamil Kiełczewski

Performance

Today 2020.04.30 I perform tests of chosen solutions on Chrome v81.0, Safari v13.1 and Firefox v75.0 on MacOs High Sierra v10.13.6.

I focus on speed of copy DATA (object with simple type fields, not methods etc.). The solutions A-I can make only shallow copy, solutions J-U can make deep copy.

Results for shallow copy

solution {...obj} (A) is fastest on chrome and firefox and medium fast on safari

solution based on Object.assign (B) is fast on all browsers

jQuery (E) and lodash (F,G,H) solutions are medium/quite fast

solution JSON.parse/stringify (K) is quite slow

solutions D and U are slow on all browsers

https://i.stack.imgur.com/mCte1.png

Results for deep copy

solution Q is fastest on all browsers

jQuery (L) and lodash (J) are medium fast

solution JSON.parse/stringify (K) is quite slow

solution U is slowest on all browsers

lodash (J) and solution U crash on Chrome for 1000 level deep object

https://i.stack.imgur.com/KxBqv.png

Details

For choosen solutions: A B C(my) D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U, I perform 4 tests

shallow-small: object with 10 non-nested fields - you can run it HERE

shallow-big: object with 1000 non-nested fields - you can run it HERE

deep-small: object with 10 levels-nested fields - you can run it HERE

deep-big: object with 1000 levels-nested fields - you can run it HERE

Objects used in tests are show in below snippet

let obj_ShallowSmall = { field0: false, field1: true, field2: 1, field3: 0, field4: null, field5: [], field6: {}, field7: "text7", field8: "text8", } let obj_DeepSmall = { level0: { level1: { level2: { level3: { level4: { level5: { level6: { level7: { level8: { level9: [[[[[[[[[['abc']]]]]]]]]], }}}}}}}}}, }; let obj_ShallowBig = Array(1000).fill(0).reduce((a,c,i) => (a['field'+i]=getField(i),a) ,{}); let obj_DeepBig = genDeepObject(1000); // ------------------ // Show objects // ------------------ console.log('obj_ShallowSmall:',JSON.stringify(obj_ShallowSmall)); console.log('obj_DeepSmall:',JSON.stringify(obj_DeepSmall)); console.log('obj_ShallowBig:',JSON.stringify(obj_ShallowBig)); console.log('obj_DeepBig:',JSON.stringify(obj_DeepBig)); // ------------------ // HELPERS // ------------------ function getField(k) { let i=k%10; if(i==0) return false; if(i==1) return true; if(i==2) return k; if(i==3) return 0; if(i==4) return null; if(i==5) return []; if(i==6) return {}; if(i>=7) return "text"+k; } function genDeepObject(N) { // generate: {level0:{level1:{...levelN: {end:[[[...N-times...['abc']...]]] }}}...}}} let obj={}; let o=obj; let arr = []; let a=arr; for(let i=0; i

Below snippet presents tested solutions and shows differences between them

function A(obj) { return {...obj} } function B(obj) { return Object.assign({}, obj); } function C(obj) { return Object.keys(obj).reduce( (a,c) => (a[c]=obj[c], a), {}) } function D(obj) { let copyOfObject = {}; Object.defineProperties(copyOfObject, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(obj)); return copyOfObject; } function E(obj) { return jQuery.extend({}, obj) // shallow } function F(obj) { return _.clone(obj); } function G(obj) { return _.clone(obj,true); } function H(obj) { return _.extend({},obj); } function I(obj) { if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj; var copy = obj.constructor(); for (var attr in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = obj[attr]; } return copy; } function J(obj) { return _.cloneDeep(obj,true); } function K(obj) { return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)); } function L(obj) { return jQuery.extend(true, {}, obj) // deep } function M(obj) { if(obj == null || typeof(obj) != 'object') return obj; var temp = new obj.constructor(); for(var key in obj) temp[key] = M(obj[key]); return temp; } function N(obj) { let EClone = function(obj) { var newObj = (obj instanceof Array) ? [] : {}; for (var i in obj) { if (i == 'EClone') continue; if (obj[i] && typeof obj[i] == "object") { newObj[i] = EClone(obj[i]); } else newObj[i] = obj[i] } return newObj; }; return EClone(obj); }; function O(obj) { if (obj == null || typeof obj != "object") return obj; if (obj.constructor != Object && obj.constructor != Array) return obj; if (obj.constructor == Date || obj.constructor == RegExp || obj.constructor == Function || obj.constructor == String || obj.constructor == Number || obj.constructor == Boolean) return new obj.constructor(obj); let to = new obj.constructor(); for (var name in obj) { to[name] = typeof to[name] == "undefined" ? O(obj[name], null) : to[name]; } return to; } function P(obj) { function clone(target, source){ for(let key in source){ // Use getOwnPropertyDescriptor instead of source[key] to prevent from trigering setter/getter. let descriptor = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(source, key); if(descriptor.value instanceof String){ target[key] = new String(descriptor.value); } else if(descriptor.value instanceof Array){ target[key] = clone([], descriptor.value); } else if(descriptor.value instanceof Object){ let prototype = Reflect.getPrototypeOf(descriptor.value); let cloneObject = clone({}, descriptor.value); Reflect.setPrototypeOf(cloneObject, prototype); target[key] = cloneObject; } else { Object.defineProperty(target, key, descriptor); } } let prototype = Reflect.getPrototypeOf(source); Reflect.setPrototypeOf(target, prototype); return target; } return clone({},obj); } function Q(obj) { var copy; // Handle the 3 simple types, and null or undefined if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj; // Handle Date if (obj instanceof Date) { copy = new Date(); copy.setTime(obj.getTime()); return copy; } // Handle Array if (obj instanceof Array) { copy = []; for (var i = 0, len = obj.length; i < len; i++) { copy[i] = Q(obj[i]); } return copy; } // Handle Object if (obj instanceof Object) { copy = {}; for (var attr in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = Q(obj[attr]); } return copy; } throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported."); } function R(obj) { const gdcc = "__getDeepCircularCopy__"; if (obj !== Object(obj)) { return obj; // primitive value } var set = gdcc in obj, cache = obj[gdcc], result; if (set && typeof cache == "function") { return cache(); } // else obj[gdcc] = function() { return result; }; // overwrite if (obj instanceof Array) { result = []; for (var i=0; i descriptor[attr] === undefined && (descriptor[attr] = basisDesc[attr]) ) const { get, set, value, writable, enumerable, configurable } = descriptor return Object.defineProperty(object, key, { enumerable, configurable, ...get || set ? { get, set } // Accessor descriptor : { value, writable } // Data descriptor }) } function clone(object) { if (object !== Object(object)) return object /* —— Check if the object belongs to a primitive data type */ if (object instanceof Node) return object.cloneNode(true) /* —— Clone DOM trees */ let _object // The clone of object switch (object.constructor) { case Array: case Object: _object = cloneObject(object) break case Date: _object = new Date(+object) break case Function: const fnStr = String(object) _object = new Function("return " + (/^(?!function |[^{]+?=>)[^(]+?\(/.test(fnStr) ? "function " : "" ) + fnStr )() copyPropDescs(_object, object) break case RegExp: _object = new RegExp(object) break default: switch (Object.prototype.toString.call(object.constructor)) { // // Stem from: case "[object Function]": // `class` case "[object Undefined]": // `Object.create(null)` _object = cloneObject(object) break default: // `Proxy` _object = object } } return _object } function cloneObject(object) { if (seen.has(object)) return seen.get(object) /* —— Handle recursive references (circular structures) */ const _object = Array.isArray(object) ? [] : Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(object)) /* —— Assign [[Prototype]] for inheritance */ seen.set(object, _object) /* —— Make `_object` the associative mirror of `object` */ Reflect.ownKeys(object).forEach(key => defineProp(_object, key, { value: clone(object[key]) }, object) ) return _object } function copyPropDescs(target, source) { Object.defineProperties(target, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(source) ) } } // ------------------------ // Test properties // ------------------------ console.log(` shallow deep func circ undefined date RegExp bigInt`) log(A); log(B); log(C); log(D); log(E); log(F); log(G); log(H); log(I); log(J); log(K); log(L); log(M); log(N); log(O); log(P); log(Q); log(R); log(S); log(T); log(U); console.log(` shallow deep func circ undefined date RegExp bigInt ---- LEGEND: shallow - solution create shallow copy deep - solution create deep copy func - solution copy functions circ - solution can copy object with circular references undefined - solution copy fields with undefined value date - solution can copy date RegExp - solution can copy fields with regular expressions bigInt - solution can copy BigInt `) // ------------------------ // Helper functions // ------------------------ function deepCompare(obj1,obj2) { return JSON.stringify(obj1)===JSON.stringify(obj2); } function getCase() { // pure data case return { undef: undefined, bool: true, num: 1, str: "txt1", e1: null, e2: [], e3: {}, e4: 0, e5: false, arr: [ false, 2, "txt3", null, [], {}, [ true,4,"txt5",null, [], {}, [true,6,"txt7",null,[],{} ], {bool: true,num: 8, str: "txt9", e1:null, e2:[] ,e3:{} ,e4: 0, e5: false} ], {bool: true,num: 10, str: "txt11", e1:null, e2:[] ,e3:{} ,e4: 0, e5: false} ], obj: { bool: true, num: 12, str: "txt13", e1: null, e2: [], e3: {}, e4: 0, e5: false, arr: [true,14,"txt15",null,[],{} ], obj: { bool: true, num: 16, str: "txt17", e1: null, e2: [], e3: {}, e4: 0, e5: false, arr: [true,18,"txt19",null,[],{} ], obj: {bool: true,num: 20, str: "txt21", e1:null, e2:[] ,e3:{} ,e4: 0, e5: false} } } }; } function check(org, copy, field, newValue) { copy[field] = newValue; return deepCompare(org,copy); } function testFunc(f) { let o = { a:1, fun: (i,j)=> i+j }; let c = f(o); let val = false try{ val = c.fun(3,4)==7; } catch(e) { } return val; } function testCirc(f) { function Circ() { this.me = this; } var o = { x: 'a', circ: new Circ(), obj_circ: null, }; o.obj_circ = o; let val = false; try{ let c = f(o); val = (o.obj_circ == o) && (o.circ == o.circ.me); } catch(e) { } return val; } function testRegExp(f) { let o = { re: /a[0-9]+/, }; let val = false; try{ let c = f(o); val = (String(c.re) == String(/a[0-9]+/)); } catch(e) { } return val; } function testDate(f) { let o = { date: new Date(), }; let val = false; try{ let c = f(o); val = (+new Date(c.date) == +new Date(o.date)); } catch(e) { } return val; } function testBigInt(f) { let val = false; try{ let o = { big: 123n, }; let c = f(o); val = o.big == c.big; } catch(e) { } return val; } function log(f) { let o = getCase(); // orginal object let oB = getCase(); // "backup" used for shallow valid test let c1 = f(o); // copy 1 for reference let c2 = f(o); // copy 2 for test shallow values let c3 = f(o); // copy 3 for test deep values let is_proper_copy = deepCompare(c1,o); // shoud be true // shallow changes let testShallow = [ ['bool',false],['num',666],['str','xyz'],['arr',[]],['obj',{}] ] .reduce((acc,curr)=> acc && check(c1,c2,curr[0], curr[1]), true ); // should be true (original object shoud not have changed shallow fields) let is_valid = deepCompare(o,oB); // deep test (intruduce some change) if (c3.arr[6]) c3.arr[6][7].num = 777; let diff_shallow = !testShallow; // shoud be true (shallow field was copied) let diff_deep = !deepCompare(c1,c3); // shoud be true (deep field was copied) let can_copy_functions = testFunc(f); let can_copy_circular = testCirc(f); let can_copy_regexp = testRegExp(f); let can_copy_date = testDate(f); let can_copy_bigInt = testBigInt(f); let has_undefined = 'undef' in c1; // field with undefined value is copied? let is_ok = is_valid && is_proper_copy; let b=(bool) => (bool+'').padEnd(5,' '); // bool value to formated string testFunc(f); if(is_ok) { console.log(`${f.name} ${b(diff_shallow)} ${b(diff_deep)} ${b(can_copy_functions)} ${b(can_copy_circular)} ${b(has_undefined)} ${b(can_copy_date)} ${b(can_copy_regexp)} ${b(can_copy_bigInt)}`) } else { console.log(`${f.name}: INVALID ${is_valid} ${is_proper_copy}`,{c1}) } } This snippet only presents tested solutions and show differences between them (but it no make performence tests)

Below there are example results for Chrome for shallow-big object

https://i.stack.imgur.com/zluC1.png


V
VaZaA

Using Lodash:

var y = _.clone(x, true);

OMG it would be insane to reinvent cloning. This is the only sane answer.
I prefer _.cloneDeep(x) as it essentially is the same thing as above, but reads better.
J
João Oliveira

In ES-6 you can simply use Object.assign(...). Ex:

let obj = {person: 'Thor Odinson'};
let clone = Object.assign({}, obj);

A good reference is here: https://googlechrome.github.io/samples/object-assign-es6/


It does not deep clone the object.
That's an assignment, not a copy. clone.Title = "just a clone" means that obj.Title = "just a clone".
@HoldOffHunger You are mistaken. Check it in your browser's JS console ( let obj = {person: 'Thor Odinson'}; let clone = Object.assign({}, obj); clone.title = "Whazzup";)
@collapsar: That is precisely what I checked, then console.log(person) will be "Whazzup", not "Thor Odinson". See August's comment.
@HoldOffHunger Does not happen in Chrome 60.0.3112.113 nor in Edge 14.14393; August's comment does not apply as the values of primitive types of obj's properties are indeed cloned. Property values that are Objects themselves will not be cloned.
b
bukart

Interested in cloning simple objects:

JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(json_original));

Source : How to copy JavaScript object to new variable NOT by reference?


Very nice - simple.
@MattH: this answer was already given in 2012. did you see it? Mohammed, did you check for existing answers before duplicating one of them?
well thats one way. ty never thought of that
C
Community

You can clone an object and remove any reference from the previous one using a single line of code. Simply do:

var obj1 = { text: 'moo1' };
var obj2 = Object.create(obj1); // Creates a new clone without references

obj2.text = 'moo2'; // Only updates obj2's text property

console.log(obj1, obj2); // Outputs: obj1: {text:'moo1'}, obj2: {text:'moo2'}

For browsers / engines that do not currently support Object.create you can use this polyfill:

// Polyfill Object.create if it does not exist
if (!Object.create) {
    Object.create = function (o) {
        var F = function () {};
        F.prototype = o;
        return new F();
    };
}

+1 Object.create(...) seems definitely the way to go.
Perfect answer. Maybe you could add an explanation for Object.hasOwnProperty? That way people know how to prevent searching the prototype link.
Works well but what browsers does the polyfill work in?
This is creating obj2 with a obj1 as it's prototype. It only works because you are shadowing the text member in obj2. You are not making a copy, just deferring to the prototype chain when a member is not found on obj2.
This does NOT create it "without references", it just moves the reference to the prototype. It's still a reference. If a property changes in the original so will the prototype property in the "clone". It's not a clone at all.
f
flori
let clone = Object.assign( Object.create( Object.getPrototypeOf(obj)), obj)

ES6 solution if you want to (shallow) clone a class instance and not just a property object.


How this is different from let cloned = Object.assign({}, obj) ?
@ceztko When obj is a class instance, Object.assign() does not clone e.g. class methods (because they are not enumerable).
C
Charles Merriam

New answer to an old question! If you have the pleasure of having using ECMAScript 2016 (ES6) with Spread Syntax, it's easy.

keepMeTheSame = {first: "Me!", second: "You!"};
cloned = {...keepMeTheSame}

This provides a clean method for a shallow copy of an object. Making a deep copy, meaning makign a new copy of every value in every recursively nested object, requires on of the heavier solutions above.

JavaScript keeps evolving.


it doesn't work when you have functions defined on objects
as far as I see spread operator only works with iterables - developer.mozilla.org says: var obj = {'key1': 'value1'}; var array = [...obj]; // TypeError: obj is not iterable
@Oleh so use ` {... obj} instead of [...obj];`
@manikantgautam I was using Object.assign() before, but now indeed object spread syntax is supported in latest Chrome, Firefox (still not in Edge and Safari). Its ECMAScript proposal... but Babel does support it as far as I can see, so probably its safe to use.
C
ConductedClever

I think there is a simple and working answer. In deep copying there are two concerns:

Keep properties independent to each other. And keep the methods alive on cloned object.

So I think one simple solution will be to first serialize and deserialize and then do an assign on it to copy functions too.

let deepCloned = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(source));
let merged = Object.assign({}, source);
Object.assign(merged, deepCloned);

Although this question has many answers, I hope this one helps too.


Although if I am permitted to import lodash, I prefer using lodash cloneDeep.
I'm using JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(source)). Always working.
@Misha, this way you will miss the functions. The term 'works' has many meanings.
And keep in mind that, the way I have mentioned, only the functions of the first layer will be copied. So If we have some objects inside each other, then the only way is to copy field by field recursively.
J
Jesse Reza Khorasanee

For a deep copy and clone, JSON.stringify then JSON.parse the object:

obj = { a: 0 , b: { c: 0}};
let deepClone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
obj.a = 5;
obj.b.c = 5;
console.log(JSON.stringify(deepClone)); // { a: 0, b: { c: 0}}

pretty clever... any downsides to this approach?
C
Christopher Peisert

Structured Cloning

2022 update: The structuredClone() global function is already available in Node 17, Deno 1.14, and most major browsers (see Can I Use).

You can use the same structured clone mechanism that the HTML standard includes for sending data between realms.

const clone = structuredClone(original);

See the other answer for more details.


+1 for giving an idea in what form it might become builtin, eventually—even if unusable right now.
o
ooo

(The following was mainly an integration of @Maciej Bukowski, @A. Levy, @Jan Turoň, @Redu's answers, and @LeviRoberts, @RobG's comments, many thanks to them!!!)

Deep copy? — YES! (mostly);
Shallow copy? — NO! (except Proxy).

I sincerely welcome everyone to test clone().
In addition, defineProp() is designed to easily and quickly (re)define or copy any type of descriptor.

Function

function clone(object) {
  /*
    Deep copy objects by value rather than by reference,
    exception: `Proxy`
  */

  const seen = new WeakMap()

  return clone(object)


  function clone(object) {
    if (object !== Object(object)) return object /*
    —— Check if the object belongs to a primitive data type */

    if (object instanceof Node) return object.cloneNode(true) /*
    —— Clone DOM trees */

    let _object // The clone of object

    switch (object.constructor) {
      case Array:
      case Object:
        _object = cloneObject(object)
        break

      case Date:
        _object = new Date(+object)
        break

      case Function:
        _object = copyFn(object)
        break

      case RegExp:
        _object = new RegExp(object)
        break

      default:
        switch (Object.prototype.toString.call(object.constructor)) {
          //                                  // Stem from:
          case "[object Function]":
            switch (object[Symbol.toStringTag]) {
              case undefined:
                _object = cloneObject(object) // `class`
                break

              case "AsyncFunction":
              case "GeneratorFunction":
              case "AsyncGeneratorFunction":
                _object = copyFn(object)
                break

              default:
                _object = object
            }
            break

          case "[object Undefined]":          // `Object.create(null)`
            _object = cloneObject(object)
            break

          default:
            _object = object                  // `Proxy`
        }
    }

    return _object
  }


  function cloneObject(object) {
    if (seen.has(object)) return seen.get(object) /*
    —— Handle recursive references (circular structures) */

    const _object = Array.isArray(object)
      ? []
      : Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(object)) /*
        —— Assign [[Prototype]] for inheritance */

    seen.set(object, _object) /*
    —— Make `_object` the associative mirror of `object` */

    Reflect.ownKeys(object).forEach(key =>
      defineProp(_object, key, { value: clone(object[key]) }, object)
    )

    return _object
  }
}


function copyPropDescs(target, source) {
  Object.defineProperties(target,
    Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(source)
  )
}


function convertFnToStr(fn) {
  let fnStr = String(fn)
  if (fn.name.startsWith("[")) // isSymbolKey
    fnStr = fnStr.replace(/\[Symbol\..+?\]/, '')
  fnStr = /^(?!(async )?(function\b|[^{]+?=>))[^(]+?\(/.test(fnStr)
    ? fnStr.replace(/^(async )?(\*)?/, "$1function$2 ") : fnStr
  return fnStr
}

function copyFn(fn) {
  const newFn = new Function(`return ${convertFnToStr(fn)}`)()
  copyPropDescs(newFn, fn)
  return newFn
}



function defineProp(object, key, descriptor = {}, copyFrom = {}) {
  const { configurable: _configurable, writable: _writable }
    = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, key)
    || { configurable: true, writable: true }

  const test = _configurable // Can redefine property
    && (_writable === undefined || _writable) // Can assign to property

  if (!test || arguments.length <= 2) return test

  const basisDesc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(copyFrom, key)
    || { configurable: true, writable: true } // Custom…
    || {}; // …or left to native default settings

  ["get", "set", "value", "writable", "enumerable", "configurable"]
    .forEach(attr =>
      descriptor[attr] === undefined &&
      (descriptor[attr] = basisDesc[attr])
    )

  const { get, set, value, writable, enumerable, configurable }
    = descriptor

  return Object.defineProperty(object, key, {
    enumerable, configurable, ...get || set
      ? { get, set } // Accessor descriptor
      : { value, writable } // Data descriptor
  })
}

// Tests

const obj0 = {
  u: undefined,
  nul: null,
  t: true,
  num: 9,
  str: "",
  sym: Symbol("symbol"),
  [Symbol("e")]: Math.E,
  arr: [[0], [1, 2]],
  d: new Date(),
  re: /f/g,
  get g() { return 0 },
  o: {
    n: 0,
    o: { f: function (...args) { } }
  },
  f: {
    getAccessorStr(object) {
      return []
        .concat(...
          Object.values(Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(object))
            .filter(desc => desc.writable === undefined)
            .map(desc => Object.values(desc))
        )
        .filter(prop => typeof prop === "function")
        .map(String)
    },
    f0: function f0() { },
    f1: function () { },
    f2: a => a / (a + 1),
    f3: () => 0,
    f4(params) { return param => param + params },
    f5: (a, b) => ({ c = 0 } = {}) => a + b + c
  }
}

defineProp(obj0, "s", { set(v) { this._s = v } })
defineProp(obj0.arr, "tint", { value: { is: "non-enumerable" } })
obj0.arr[0].name = "nested array"


let obj1 = clone(obj0)
obj1.o.n = 1
obj1.o.o.g = function g(a = 0, b = 0) { return a + b }
obj1.arr[1][1] = 3
obj1.d.setTime(+obj0.d + 60 * 1000)
obj1.arr.tint.is = "enumerable? no"
obj1.arr[0].name = "a nested arr"
defineProp(obj1, "s", { set(v) { this._s = v + 1 } })
defineProp(obj1.re, "multiline", { value: true })

console.log("\n\n" + "-".repeat(2 ** 6))




console.log(">:>: Test - Routinely")

console.log("obj0:\n ", JSON.stringify(obj0))
console.log("obj1:\n ", JSON.stringify(obj1))
console.log()

console.log("obj0:\n ", obj0)
console.log("obj1:\n ", obj1)
console.log()

console.log("obj0\n ",
  ".arr.tint:", obj0.arr.tint, "\n ",
  ".arr[0].name:", obj0.arr[0].name
)
console.log("obj1\n ",
  ".arr.tint:", obj1.arr.tint, "\n ",
  ".arr[0].name:", obj1.arr[0].name
)
console.log()

console.log("Accessor-type descriptor\n ",
  "of obj0:", obj0.f.getAccessorStr(obj0), "\n ",
  "of obj1:", obj1.f.getAccessorStr(obj1), "\n ",
  "set (obj0 & obj1) .s :", obj0.s = obj1.s = 0, "\n ",
  "  → (obj0 , obj1) ._s:", obj0._s, ",", obj1._s
)

console.log("—— obj0 has not been interfered.")

console.log("\n\n" + "-".repeat(2 ** 6))




console.log(">:>: Test - More kinds of functions")

const fnsForTest = {
  f(_) { return _ },
  func: _ => _,
  aFunc: async _ => _,
  async function() { },
  async asyncFunc() { },
  aFn: async function () { },
  *gen() { },
  async *asyncGen() { },
  aG1: async function* () { },
  aG2: async function* gen() { },
  *[Symbol.iterator]() { yield* Object.keys(this) }
}

console.log(Reflect.ownKeys(fnsForTest).map(k =>
  `${String(k)}:
  ${fnsForTest[k].name}-->
    ${String(fnsForTest[k])}`
).join("\n"))

const normedFnsStr = `{
  f: function f(_) { return _ },
  func: _ => _,
  aFunc: async _ => _,
  function: async function() { },
  asyncFunc: async function asyncFunc() { },
  aFn: async function () { },
  gen: function* gen() { },
  asyncGen: async function* asyncGen() { },
  aG1: async function* () { },
  aG2: async function* gen() { },
  [Symbol.iterator]: function* () { yield* Object.keys(this) }
}`

const copiedFnsForTest = clone(fnsForTest)
console.log("fnsForTest:", fnsForTest)
console.log("fnsForTest (copied):", copiedFnsForTest)
console.log("fnsForTest (normed str):", eval(`(${normedFnsStr})`))
console.log("Comparison of fnsForTest and its clone:",
  Reflect.ownKeys(fnsForTest).map(k =>
    [k, fnsForTest[k] === copiedFnsForTest[k]]
  )
)

console.log("\n\n" + "-".repeat(2 ** 6))




console.log(">:>: Test - Circular structures")

obj0.o.r = {}
obj0.o.r.recursion = obj0.o
obj0.arr[1] = obj0.arr

obj1 = clone(obj0)
console.log("obj0:\n ", obj0)
console.log("obj1:\n ", obj1)

console.log("Clear obj0's recursion:",
  obj0.o.r.recursion = null, obj0.arr[1] = 1
)
console.log(
  "obj0\n ",
  ".o.r:", obj0.o.r, "\n ",
  ".arr:", obj0.arr
)
console.log(
  "obj1\n ",
  ".o.r:", obj1.o.r, "\n ",
  ".arr:", obj1.arr
)
console.log("—— obj1 has not been interfered.")


console.log("\n\n" + "-".repeat(2 ** 6))




console.log(">:>: Test - Classes")

class Person {
  constructor(name) {
    this.name = name
  }
}

class Boy extends Person { }
Boy.prototype.sex = "M"

const boy0 = new Boy
boy0.hobby = { sport: "spaceflight" }

const boy1 = clone(boy0)
boy1.hobby.sport = "superluminal flight"

boy0.name = "one"
boy1.name = "neo"

console.log("boy0:\n ", boy0)
console.log("boy1:\n ", boy1)
console.log("boy1's prototype === boy0's:",
  Object.getPrototypeOf(boy1) === Object.getPrototypeOf(boy0)
)

References

Object.create() | MDN Object.defineProperties() | MDN Enumerability and ownership of properties | MDN TypeError: cyclic object value | MDN

Language tricks used

Conditionally add prop to object


Since Symbol("a") === Symbol("a") is false, shouldn’t clone(Symbol("a")) use Symbol(object.description) to create a new symbol? Or would this have too weird of an impact on well-known symbols?
@SebastianSimon 👍 Your consideration is very comprehensive! And your last sentence is more correct, e.g. (new Map)[Symbol.iterator] vs (new Map)[Symbol(Symbol.iterator.description)].
A
Ashok R

Use lodash _.cloneDeep().

Shallow Copy: lodash _.clone()

A shallow copy can be made by simply copying the reference.

let obj1 = {
    a: 0,
    b: {
        c: 0,
        e: {
            f: 0
        }
    }
};
let obj3 = _.clone(obj1);
obj1.a = 4;
obj1.b.c = 4;
obj1.b.e.f = 100;

console.log(JSON.stringify(obj1));
//{"a":4,"b":{"c":4,"e":{"f":100}}}

console.log(JSON.stringify(obj3));
//{"a":0,"b":{"c":4,"e":{"f":100}}}

https://i.stack.imgur.com/vmysI.png

Deep Copy: lodash _.cloneDeep()

fields are dereferenced: rather than references to objects being copied

let obj1 = {
    a: 0,
    b: {
        c: 0,
        e: {
            f: 0
        }
    }
};
let obj3 = _.cloneDeep(obj1);
obj1.a = 100;
obj1.b.c = 100;
obj1.b.e.f = 100;

console.log(JSON.stringify(obj1));
{"a":100,"b":{"c":100,"e":{"f":100}}}

console.log(JSON.stringify(obj3));
{"a":0,"b":{"c":0,"e":{"f":0}}}

https://i.stack.imgur.com/z0M6n.png