I have added a new property to my existing model. It's a bool property with a default value of true. There are existing data in this table and I would like to set one specific row's new property to false right after creating the new field, in the Up method.
public override void Up()
{
AddColumn("dbo.RequestValidationErrors", "IsBreaking",
c => c.Boolean(nullable: false));
using (Context ctx = new Context())
{
var validation =
ctx.RequestValidationErrorSet
.FirstOrDefault
(x => x.WordCode == "RequestValidationError.MoreThanOneItemFound");
if (validation != null)
{
validation.IsBreaking = false;
ctx.SaveChanges();
}
}
}
}
This way EF throws an error during saying
System.InvalidOperationException: The model backing the 'DbContext' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database
Is it possible to change the database here or should I do it elsewhere?
In the middle of a migration, it's better to use Sql()
method to update database data.
Sql("UPDATE dbo.RequestValidationErrors SET IsBreaking = 0 WHERE WordCode = 'RequestValidationError.MoreThanOneItemFound'");
Also you should define the default value for the new column. So the solution should be something like this:
public override void Up()
{
AddColumn("dbo.RequestValidationErrors", "IsBreaking", c => c.Boolean(nullable: false, default: true));
Sql("UPDATE dbo.RequestValidationErrors SET IsBreaking = 0 WHERE WordCode = \"RequestValidationError.MoreThanOneItemFound\"");
}
Using a DbContext
in the middle of its migration is very ambiguous. What do you expect from the context? It has the after migration state in its models, but the database has the before migration state in the tables. So the model and database do not match. If you still insist on using DbContext
in your code, disabling the model checking might be the solution. You can disable model checking using:
Database.SetInitializer<Log4ProContext>(null);
UPDATE:
As of EF Core 2.1 you can use UpdateData
instead of Sql
method for simpler cases just as @ntfrex mentioned in an answer:
migrationBuilder.UpdateData(
table: "RequestValidationErrors",
keyColumn: "WordCode",
keyValue: "RequestValidationError.MoreThanOneItemFound",
column: "IsBreaking",
value: false);
My advice is NOT TO USE nameof
operator for table and column names nowhere in migrations at all. As renaming these classes later would cause the old migrations to fail in production as the table names in the database are still with the old name.
Instead of using the Sql
method you could also use the UpdateData
method.
migrationBuilder.UpdateData(
table: "RequestValidationErrors",
keyColumn: "WordCode",
keyValue: "RequestValidationError.MoreThanOneItemFound",
column: "IsBreaking",
value: false);
(I don't know if only ef core supports this method)
If you want to use the framework for changes like this, you should separate Database changes from Data changes.
Create a migration for just the Database changes, and execute.
Then create a new migration (the Up() and Down() methods will be empty). You can now instantiate your DatabaseContext and there will be no error. This way you can use the Framework for these changes, and properly implement a Down() method.
migrationBuilder.Sql
or .UpdateData
method to migrate your data as there should not be a problem.
Writing DataMigrations for EF6 can be a chore. We put together a library I'm just open sourcing here for others to use, that adds in this long-promised, missing feature to EF6. Just write classes using regular EF queries etc.
https://github.com/b9chris/Brass9.Data
Success story sharing
UpdateData
wasn't available at the time I was writing this answer. I've just updated the answer :)