EDIT: this is a duplicate, see here
I can't find any examples of using a dynamic key name when setting the state. This is what I want to do:
inputChangeHandler : function (event) {
this.setState( { event.target.id : event.target.value } );
},
where event.target.id is used as the state key to be updated. Is this not possible in React?
Thanks to @Cory's hint, i used this:
inputChangeHandler : function (event) {
var stateObject = function() {
returnObj = {};
returnObj[this.target.id] = this.target.value;
return returnObj;
}.bind(event)();
this.setState( stateObject );
},
If using ES6 or the Babel transpiler to transform your JSX code, you can accomplish this with computed property names, too:
inputChangeHandler : function (event) {
this.setState({ [event.target.id]: event.target.value });
// alternatively using template strings for strings
// this.setState({ [`key${event.target.id}`]: event.target.value });
}
When you need to handle multiple controlled input elements, you can add a name attribute to each element and let the handler function choose what to do based on the value of event.target.name.
For example:
inputChangeHandler(event) { this.setState({ [event.target.name]: event.target.value }); }
this.state([event.target.name])
?
How I accomplished this...
inputChangeHandler: function(event) {
var key = event.target.id
var val = event.target.value
var obj = {}
obj[key] = val
this.setState(obj)
},
this.forceUpdate();
which should not have been the case with latest React. Let's see whats the issue later!!
I just wanted to add, that you can also use de-structuring to refactor the code and make it look neater.
inputChangeHandler: function ({ target: { id, value }) {
this.setState({ [id]: value });
},
I had a similar problem.
I wanted to set the state of where the 2nd level key was stored in a variable.
e.g. this.setState({permissions[perm.code]: e.target.checked})
However this isn't valid syntax.
I used the following code to achieve this:
this.setState({
permissions: {
...this.state.permissions,
[perm.code]: e.target.checked
}
});
this.setState({ [`${event.target.id}`]: event.target.value}, () => {
console.log("State updated: ", JSON.stringify(this.state[event.target.id]));
});
Please mind the quote character.
[ ]
do? Why does react require that?
In loop with .map
work like this:
{
dataForm.map(({ id, placeholder, type }) => {
return <Input
value={this.state.type}
onChangeText={(text) => this.setState({ [type]: text })}
placeholder={placeholder}
key={id} />
})
}
Note the []
in type
parameter. Hope this helps :)
I was looking for a pretty and simple solution and I found this:
this.setState({ [`image${i}`]: image })
Hope this helps
With ES6+ you can just do [${variable}
]
when the given element is a object:
handleNewObj = e => {
const data = e[Object.keys(e)[0]];
this.setState({
anykeyofyourstate: {
...this.state.anykeyofyourstate,
[Object.keys(e)[0]]: data
}
});
};
hope it helps someone
Your state with dictionary update some key without losing other value
state =
{
name:"mjpatel"
parsedFilter:
{
page:2,
perPage:4,
totalPages: 50,
}
}
Solution is below
let { parsedFilter } = this.state
this.setState({
parsedFilter: {
...this.state.parsedFilter,
page: 5
}
});
here update value for key "page" with value 5
try this one please.
State is here as example
this.state = {
name: '',
surname: '',
username: '',
email: '',
}
Onchange function is here.
onChangeData = (type, event) => {
const stateData = this.state;
if (event === "" || event === "Seçiniz")
stateData[type] = undefined
else
stateData[type] = event
this.setState({ stateData});
}
Can use a spread syntax, something like this:
inputChangeHandler : function (event) {
this.setState( {
...this.state,
[event.target.id]: event.target.value
} );
},
prevState
or you won’t be able to guarantee that you’re using the most up-to-date state. However, if you’re just setting a single, top-level state value like in @sta’s answer, then you don’t need to spread on state since React will merge it in for you. reactjs.org/docs/…
Success story sharing
computed property names
trad
, this is what i was looking for to avoid code duplication for<Radio />
implementation.this.setState({ [event.target.id]: event.target.value });
then how would you access that state usingthis.state......
?