Most efficient way to remove special characters from string

Why do you think that your method is not efficient? It's actually one of the most efficient ways that you can do it.

You should of course read the character into a local variable or use an enumerator to reduce the number of array accesses:

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(this string str) {
   StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
   foreach (char c in str) {
      if ((c >= '0' && c <= '9') || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z') || (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') || c == '.' || c == '_') {
         sb.Append(c);
      }
   }
   return sb.ToString();
}

One thing that makes a method like this efficient is that it scales well. The execution time will be relative to the length of the string. There is no nasty surprises if you would use it on a large string.

Edit: I made a quick performance test, running each function a million times with a 24 character string. These are the results:

Original function: 54.5 ms. My suggested change: 47.1 ms. Mine with setting StringBuilder capacity: 43.3 ms. Regular expression: 294.4 ms.

Edit 2: I added the distinction between A-Z and a-z in the code above. (I reran the performance test, and there is no noticable difference.)

Edit 3: I tested the lookup+char[] solution, and it runs in about 13 ms.

The price to pay is, of course, the initialization of the huge lookup table and keeping it in memory. Well, it's not that much data, but it's much for such a trivial function...

private static bool[] _lookup;

static Program() {
   _lookup = new bool[65536];
   for (char c = '0'; c <= '9'; c++) _lookup[c] = true;
   for (char c = 'A'; c <= 'Z'; c++) _lookup[c] = true;
   for (char c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; c++) _lookup[c] = true;
   _lookup['.'] = true;
   _lookup['_'] = true;
}

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string str) {
   char[] buffer = new char[str.Length];
   int index = 0;
   foreach (char c in str) {
      if (_lookup[c]) {
         buffer[index] = c;
         index++;
      }
   }
   return new string(buffer, 0, index);
}

Well, unless you really need to squeeze the performance out of your function, just go with what is easiest to maintain and understand. A regular expression would look like this:

For additional performance, you can either pre-compile it or just tell it to compile on first call (subsequent calls will be faster.)

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string str)
{
    return Regex.Replace(str, "[^a-zA-Z0-9_.]+", "", RegexOptions.Compiled);
}

I suggest creating a simple lookup table, which you can initialize in the static constructor to set any combination of characters to valid. This lets you do a quick, single check.

edit

Also, for speed, you'll want to initialize the capacity of your StringBuilder to the length of your input string. This will avoid reallocations. These two methods together will give you both speed and flexibility.

another edit

I think the compiler might optimize it out, but as a matter of style as well as efficiency, I recommend foreach instead of for.

A regular expression will look like:

public string RemoveSpecialChars(string input)
{
    return Regex.Replace(input, @"[^0-9a-zA-Z\._]", string.Empty);
}

But if performance is highly important, I recommend you to do some benchmarks before selecting the "regex path"...

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string str)
{
    char[] buffer = new char[str.Length];
    int idx = 0;

    foreach (char c in str)
    {
        if ((c >= '0' && c <= '9') || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z')
            || (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') || (c == '.') || (c == '_'))
        {
            buffer[idx] = c;
            idx++;
        }
    }

    return new string(buffer, 0, idx);
}

If you're using a dynamic list of characters, LINQ may offer a much faster and graceful solution:

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string value, char[] specialCharacters)
{
    return new String(value.Except(specialCharacters).ToArray());
}

I compared this approach against two of the previous "fast" approaches (release compilation):

Char array solution by LukeH - 427 ms

StringBuilder solution - 429 ms

LINQ (this answer) - 98 ms

Note that the algorithm is slightly modified - the characters are passed in as an array rather than hard-coded, which could be impacting things slightly (ie/ the other solutions would have an inner foor loop to check the character array).

If I switch to a hard-coded solution using a LINQ where clause, the results are:

Char array solution - 7ms

StringBuilder solution - 22ms

LINQ - 60 ms

Might be worth looking at LINQ or a modified approach if you're planning on writing a more generic solution, rather than hard-coding the list of characters. LINQ definitely gives you concise, highly readable code - even more so than Regex.

I'm not convinced your algorithm is anything but efficient. It's O(n) and only looks at each character once. You're not gonna get any better than that unless you magically know values before checking them.

I would however initialize the capacity of your StringBuilder to the initial size of the string. I'm guessing your perceived performance problem comes from memory reallocation.

Side note: Checking A-z is not safe. You're including [, \, ], ^, _, and `...

Side note 2: For that extra bit of efficiency, put the comparisons in an order to minimize the number of comparisons. (At worst, you're talking 8 comparisons tho, so don't think too hard.) This changes with your expected input, but one example could be:

if (str[i] >= '0' && str[i] <= 'z' && 
    (str[i] >= 'a' || str[i] <= '9' ||  (str[i] >= 'A' && str[i] <= 'Z') || 
    str[i] == '_') || str[i] == '.')

Side note 3: If for whatever reason you REALLY need this to be fast, a switch statement may be faster. The compiler should create a jump table for you, resulting in only a single comparison:

switch (str[i])
{
    case '0':
    case '1':
    .
    .
    .
    case '.':
        sb.Append(str[i]);
        break;
}

You can use regular expresion as follows:

return Regex.Replace(strIn, @"[^\w\.@-]", "", RegexOptions.None, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1.0));

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();

for (int i = 0; i < fName.Length; i++)
{
   if (char.IsLetterOrDigit(fName[i]))
    {
       sb.Append(fName[i]);
    }
}

It seems good to me. The only improvement I would make is to initialize the StringBuilder with the length of the string.

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str.Length);

I agree with this code sample. The only different it I make it into Extension Method of string type. So that you can use it in a very simple line or code:

string test = "abc@#$123";
test.RemoveSpecialCharacters();

Thank to Guffa for your experiment.

public static class MethodExtensionHelper
    {
    public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(this string str)
        {
            StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
            foreach (char c in str)
            {
                if ((c >= '0' && c <= '9') || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z') || (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') || c == '_')
                {
                    sb.Append(c);
                }
            }
            return sb.ToString();
        }
}

I would use a String Replace with a Regular Expression searching for "special characters", replacing all characters found with an empty string.

I had to do something similar for work, but in my case I had to filter all that is not a letter, number or whitespace (but you could easily modify it to your needs). The filtering is done client-side in JavaScript, but for security reasons I am also doing the filtering server-side. Since I can expect most of the strings to be clean, I would like to avoid copying the string unless I really need to. This let my to the implementation below, which should perform better for both clean and dirty strings.

public static string EnsureOnlyLetterDigitOrWhiteSpace(string input)
{
    StringBuilder cleanedInput = null;
    for (var i = 0; i < input.Length; ++i)
    {
        var currentChar = input[i];
        var charIsValid = char.IsLetterOrDigit(currentChar) || char.IsWhiteSpace(currentChar);

        if (charIsValid)
        {
            if(cleanedInput != null)
                cleanedInput.Append(currentChar);
        }
        else
        {
            if (cleanedInput != null) continue;
            cleanedInput = new StringBuilder();
            if (i > 0)
                cleanedInput.Append(input.Substring(0, i));
        }
    }

    return cleanedInput == null ? input : cleanedInput.ToString();
}

There are lots of proposed solutions here, some more efficient than others, but perhaps not very readable. Here's one that may not be the most efficient, but certainly usable for most situations, and is quite concise and readable, leveraging Linq:

string stringToclean = "This is a test.  Do not try this at home; you might get hurt. Don't believe it?";

var validPunctuation = new HashSet<char>(". -");

var cleanedVersion = new String(stringToclean.Where(x => (x >= 'A' && x <= 'Z') || (x >= 'a' && x <= 'z') || validPunctuation.Contains(x)).ToArray());

var cleanedLowercaseVersion = new String(stringToclean.ToLower().Where(x => (x >= 'a' && x <= 'z') || validPunctuation.Contains(x)).ToArray());

For S&G's, Linq-ified way:

var original = "(*^%foo)(@)&^@#><>?:\":';=-+_";
var valid = new char[] { 
    'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 
    'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 
    'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N', 'O', 'P', 'Q', 'R', 'S', 
    'T', 'U', 'V', 'W', 'X', 'Y', 'Z', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', 
    '9', '0', '.', '_' };
var result = string.Join("",
    (from x in original.ToCharArray() 
     where valid.Contains(x) select x.ToString())
        .ToArray());

I don't think this is going to be the most efficient way, however.

public string RemoveSpecial(string evalstr)
{
StringBuilder finalstr = new StringBuilder();
            foreach(char c in evalstr){
            int charassci = Convert.ToInt16(c);
            if (!(charassci >= 33 && charassci <= 47))// special char ???
             finalstr.append(c);
            }
return finalstr.ToString();
}

Use:

s.erase(std::remove_if(s.begin(), s.end(), my_predicate), s.end());

bool my_predicate(char c)
{
 return !(isalpha(c) || c=='_' || c==' '); // depending on you definition of special characters
}

And you'll get a clean string s.

erase() will strip it of all the special characters and is highly customisable with the my_predicate() function.

HashSet is O(1) Not sure if it is faster than the existing comparison

private static HashSet<char> ValidChars = new HashSet<char>() { 'a', 'b', 'c', 'A', 'B', 'C', '1', '2', '3', '_' };
public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string str)
{
    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str.Length / 2);
    foreach (char c in str)
    {
        if (ValidChars.Contains(c)) sb.Append(c);
    }
    return sb.ToString();
}

I tested and this in not faster than the accepted answer. I will leave it up as if you needed a configurable set of characters this would be a good solution.

I wonder if a Regex-based replacement (possibly compiled) is faster. Would have to test that Someone has found this to be ~5 times slower.

Other than that, you should initialize the StringBuilder with an expected length, so that the intermediate string doesn't have to be copied around while it grows.

A good number is the length of the original string, or something slightly lower (depending on the nature of the functions inputs).

Finally, you can use a lookup table (in the range 0..127) to find out whether a character is to be accepted.

The following code has the following output (conclusion is that we can also save some memory resources allocating array smaller size):

lookup = new bool[123];

for (var c = '0'; c <= '9'; c++)
{
    lookup[c] = true; System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine((int)c + ": " + (char)c);
}

for (var c = 'A'; c <= 'Z'; c++)
{
    lookup[c] = true; System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine((int)c + ": " + (char)c);
}

for (var c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; c++)
{
    lookup[c] = true; System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine((int)c + ": " + (char)c);
}

48: 0  
49: 1  
50: 2  
51: 3  
52: 4  
53: 5  
54: 6  
55: 7  
56: 8  
57: 9  
65: A  
66: B  
67: C  
68: D  
69: E  
70: F  
71: G  
72: H  
73: I  
74: J  
75: K  
76: L  
77: M  
78: N  
79: O  
80: P  
81: Q  
82: R  
83: S  
84: T  
85: U  
86: V  
87: W  
88: X  
89: Y  
90: Z  
97: a  
98: b  
99: c  
100: d  
101: e  
102: f  
103: g  
104: h  
105: i  
106: j  
107: k  
108: l  
109: m  
110: n  
111: o  
112: p  
113: q  
114: r  
115: s  
116: t  
117: u  
118: v  
119: w  
120: x  
121: y  
122: z  

You can also add the following code lines to support Russian locale (array size will be 1104):

for (var c = 'А'; c <= 'Я'; c++)
{
    lookup[c] = true; System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine((int)c + ": " + (char)c);
}

for (var c = 'а'; c <= 'я'; c++)
{
    lookup[c] = true; System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine((int)c + ": " + (char)c);
}

I'm not sure it is the most efficient way, but It works for me

 Public Function RemoverTildes(stIn As String) As String
    Dim stFormD As String = stIn.Normalize(NormalizationForm.FormD)
    Dim sb As New StringBuilder()

    For ich As Integer = 0 To stFormD.Length - 1
        Dim uc As UnicodeCategory = CharUnicodeInfo.GetUnicodeCategory(stFormD(ich))
        If uc <> UnicodeCategory.NonSpacingMark Then
            sb.Append(stFormD(ich))
        End If
    Next
    Return (sb.ToString().Normalize(NormalizationForm.FormC))
End Function

Another way that attempts to improve performance by reducing allocations, especially if this function is called many times.

It works because you can guarantee the result won't be longer than the input, so the input and output can be passed without creating extra copies in memory. For this reason you can't use stackalloc to create the buffer array as this would require a copy out of the buffer.

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(this string str)
{
    return RemoveSpecialCharacters(str.AsSpan()).ToString();
}

public static ReadOnlySpan<char> RemoveSpecialCharacters(this ReadOnlySpan<char> str)
{
    Span<char> buffer = new char[str.Length];
    int idx = 0;

    foreach (char c in str)
    {
        if (char.IsLetterOrDigit(c))
        {
            buffer[idx] = c;
            idx++;
        }
    }

    return buffer.Slice(0, idx);
}

Shortest way just a 3 line...

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string str)
{
    var sb = new StringBuilder();
    foreach (var c in str.Where(c => c >= '0' && c <= '9' || c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z' || c >= 'a' && c <= 'z' || c == '.' || c == '_')) sb.Append(c); 
    return sb.ToString();
}

Simple way with LINQ

string text = "123a22 ";
var newText = String.Join(string.Empty, text.Where(x => x != 'a'));

If you need to clean up the input string in case of injections or typos (rare events), the fastest way is to use the switch() to check all characters (the compiler does a good job of optimizing the execution time of switch() ) plus the additional code to remove the unwanted characters if there were found. Here is the solution:

    public static string RemoveExtraCharacters(string input)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(input))
            return "";

        input = input.Trim();

        StringBuilder sb = null;

    reStart:
        if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(input))
        {
            var len = input.Length; ;

            for (int i = 0; i < len; i++)
            {
                switch (input[i])
                {
                    case '0':
                    case '1':
                    case '2':
                    case '3':
                    case '4':
                    case '5':
                    case '6':
                    case '7':
                    case '8':
                    case '9':
                    case 'A':
                    case 'B':
                    case 'C':
                    case 'D':
                    case 'E':
                    case 'F':
                    case 'G':
                    case 'H':
                    case 'I':
                    case 'J':
                    case 'K':
                    case 'L':
                    case 'M':
                    case 'N':
                    case 'O':
                    case 'Q':
                    case 'P':
                    case 'R':
                    case 'S':
                    case 'T':
                    case 'U':
                    case 'V':
                    case 'W':
                    case 'X':
                    case 'Y':
                    case 'Z':
                    case 'a':
                    case 'b':
                    case 'c':
                    case 'd':
                    case 'e':
                    case 'f':
                    case 'g':
                    case 'h':
                    case 'i':
                    case 'j':
                    case 'k':
                    case 'l':
                    case 'm':
                    case 'n':
                    case 'o':
                    case 'q':
                    case 'p':
                    case 'r':
                    case 's':
                    case 't':
                    case 'u':
                    case 'v':
                    case 'w':
                    case 'x':
                    case 'y':
                    case 'z':
                    case '/':
                    case '_':
                    case '-':
                    case '+':
                    case '.':
                    case ',':
                    case '*':
                    case ':':
                    case '=':
                    case ' ':
                    case '^':
                    case '$':
                        break;  

                    default:
                        if (sb == null)
                            sb = new StringBuilder();

                        sb.Append(input.Substring(0, i));
                        if (i + 1 < len)
                        {
                            input = input.Substring(i + 1);
                            goto reStart;
                        }
                        else
                            input = null;
                        break;
                }
            }
        }

        if (sb != null)
        {
            if (input != null)
                sb.Append(input);
            return sb.ToString();
        }

        return input;
    }

public static string RemoveAllSpecialCharacters(this string text) {
  if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(text))
    return text;

  string result = Regex.Replace(text, "[:!@#$%^&*()}{|\":?><\\[\\]\\;'/.,~]", " ");
  return result;
}

If you're worried about speed, use pointers to edit the existing string. You could pin the string and get a pointer to it, then run a for loop over each character, overwriting each invalid character with a replacement character. It would be extremely efficient and would not require allocating any new string memory. You would also need to compile your module with the unsafe option, and add the "unsafe" modifier to your method header in order to use pointers.

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    string str = "string!$%with^&*invalid!!characters";
    Console.WriteLine( str ); //print original string
    FixMyString( str, ' ' );
    Console.WriteLine( str ); //print string again to verify that it has been modified
    Console.ReadLine(); //pause to leave command prompt open
}


public static unsafe void FixMyString( string str, char replacement_char )
{
    fixed (char* p_str = str)
    {
        char* c = p_str; //temp pointer, since p_str is read-only
        for (int i = 0; i < str.Length; i++, c++) //loop through each character in string, advancing the character pointer as well
            if (!IsValidChar(*c)) //check whether the current character is invalid
                (*c) = replacement_char; //overwrite character in existing string with replacement character
    }
}

public static bool IsValidChar( char c )
{
    return (c >= '0' && c <= '9') || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z') || (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') || (c == '.' || c == '_');
    //return char.IsLetterOrDigit( c ) || c == '.' || c == '_'; //this may work as well
}

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string str){
    return str.replaceAll("[^A-Za-z0-9_\\\\.]", "");
}