ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Change color of PNG image via CSS?

Given a transparent PNG displaying a simple shape in white, is it possible to somehow change the color of this through CSS? Some kind of overlay or what not?

You can set background-color CSS property. You can create non-transparent part that will be fixed, and transparent part of image which will be filled by any color you like via CSS. Is that what you want to achieve?
@qbk, this is worth an answer, not just a comment. And you beat me by 1 second, technically.
You can use psuedo-elements with a blending mode to recolor any icon that is 100% black or 100% white (background stays transparent). See my answer here: stackoverflow.com/a/39796437/1472114
For those looking for an actual, up-to-date answer that doesn't involve those ghastly "filters" which are totally not meant for this, look no further than: stackoverflow.com/a/32736304/671092 You can skip the rest: you're welcome.

M
MaxiGui

You can use filters with -webkit-filter and filter: Filters are relatively new to browsers but supported in over 90% of browsers according to the following CanIUse table: https://caniuse.com/#feat=css-filters

You can change an image to grayscale, sepia and lot more (look at the example).

So you can now change the color of a PNG file with filters.

body { background-color:#03030a; min-width: 800px; min-height: 400px } img { width:20%; float:left; margin:0; } /*Filter styles*/ .saturate { filter: saturate(3); } .grayscale { filter: grayscale(100%); } .contrast { filter: contrast(160%); } .brightness { filter: brightness(0.25); } .blur { filter: blur(3px); } .invert { filter: invert(100%); } .sepia { filter: sepia(100%); } .huerotate { filter: hue-rotate(180deg); } .rss.opacity { filter: opacity(50%); } Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa Mona Lisa

Source


So short answer is that there isn't any general solution for the majority of browsers.
But will huerotate or saturate actually do anthing to a white image?
2016 Update: this now works in almost all browsers except IE: caniuse.com/#feat=css-filters
@datatype_void Sometimes you don't control the starting image yourself. So, it seems that you agree that my point is valid, you can't get to any color starting from black or white. Oh, and I played for way more than 5 minutes to reach this conclusion.
also specify that you can do stuff like this : .gifcorrect{ filter: invert(28%) sepia(100%) hue-rotate(-180deg) saturate(3); } which means you CAN go from black & transparent or grayscale to color and it works even on animated gifs
F
Fadi Abo Msalam

I found this great codepen example that you insert your hex color value and it returns the needed filter to apply this color to png

CSS filter generator to convert from black to target hex color

for example i needed my png to have the following color #1a9790

then you have to apply the following filter to you png

filter: invert(48%) sepia(13%) saturate(3207%) hue-rotate(130deg) brightness(95%) contrast(80%);

PS: The codepen is based on this brilliant answer by MultiplyByZer0 here: How to transform black into any given color using only CSS filters

all credits goes to him :clap:


I have change color to white from blue using this code: filter: invert(1%) sepia(1%) saturate(1%) hue-rotate(1deg) brightness(1000%) contrast(80%);
Author deserve a statue! (note the: brightness(0) saturate(100%) optional prepend that kills any doubt)
Doesnt work. The browser show all filters one by one and stay on contrast
If anyone needs it, here is a TS conversion of this code gist.github.com/dwjohnston/7e60bf5d4b6c071cd869f9f346241c08
This works for black backgrounds or images. For white elements, try fiddling with the invert parameter to get the proper color.
M
Max Hodges

You might want to take a look at Icon fonts. http://css-tricks.com/examples/IconFont/

EDIT: I'm using Font-Awesome on my latest project. You can even bootstrap it. Simply put this in your <head>:

<link href="//netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/3.2.1/css/font-awesome.min.css" rel="stylesheet">

<!-- And if you want to support IE7, add this aswell -->
<link href="//netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/3.2.1/css/font-awesome-ie7.min.css" rel="stylesheet">

And then go ahead and add some icon-links like this:

<a class="icon-thumbs-up"></a>

Here's the full cheat sheet

--edit--

Font-Awesome uses different class names in the new version, probably because this makes the CSS files drastically smaller, and to avoid ambiguous css classes. So now you should use:

<a class="fa fa-thumbs-up"></a>

EDIT 2:

Just found out github also uses its own icon font: Octicons It's free to download. They also have some tips on how to create your very own icon fonts.


+1 for out of the box thinking. And nowadays there are easy to use online apps to help you create a webfont from an (svg) image.
If is the old class name and is the new one I don't think it makes the CSS smaller, I can see an additional whitespace between fa and fa-thumbs-up, add atleast 1 additional byte on to that CSS file if I'm not mistaken?
Font Awesome was great in it's day, unfortunately its render blocking, which makes google and it's users unhappy. We first addressed this by removing unused fonts from both the CSS and the binary font files, reducing data by around half. We're now in the process of removing altogether and replacing with a simple sprite, which is not render blocking (DOM and CSSOM process faster, making elements on page appear faster), and will reduce data by another 75%, down to 6KB. FA is around 100KB. CSS masks may help in our case, but probably unnecessary.
R
Rehmat

The simplest one line that worked for me:

filter: opacity(0.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 blue);

You can adjust opacity from 0 to 1 to make color lighter or darker.


repeat drop-shadow 2-3 times to make it stronger
GENIUS SOLUTION, looks a little messy in the CSS, but with a comment, it's perfectly understandable. Thanks!
wont work to get exact color, it is always some sort of mix between the original color and the new one.
this approach slightly distorts the image and it gets worse every time drop-shadow is applied. Like making a copy of a copy the results are different from the original.
@swisswiss Don't repeat the dropshadow, add a saturate filter with >100% so it looks something like "filter: opacity(0.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 blue) saturate(1000%);" This does everything with a single pass which will solve the issue that SMAG brings up.
V
Vasan Jiaramaneetwesin

I've been able to do this using SVG filter. You can write a filter that multiplies the color of source image with the color you want to change to. In the code snippet below, flood-color is the color we want to change image color to (which is Red in this case.) feComposite tells the filter how we're processing the color. The formula for feComposite with arithmetic is (k1*i1*i2 + k2*i1 + k3*i2 + k4) where i1 and i2 are input colors for in/in2 accordingly. So specifying only k1=1 means it will do just i1*i2, which means multiplying both input colors together.

Note: This only works with HTML5 since this is using inline SVG. But I think you might be able to make this work with older browser by putting SVG in a separate file. I haven't tried that approach yet.

Here's the snippet:


Man you are getting robbed on this answer. Anyone looking to colorize images beyond what filter: hue-rotate can do - this is the way to do it.
for icon with alpha, can replace <feComposite in="SourceGraphic" in2="flood" operator="arithmetic" k1="1" k2="0" k3="0" k4="0" /> with <feComposite in="flood" in2="SourceAlpha" operator="atop"/> (works on white, color and black)
@Salix exactly what I was looking for to emulate iOS image tinting - thanks!
@AaronAsh glad my comment on an old answer was useful :)
C
Community

Yes :)

Surfin' Safari - Blog Archive » CSS Masks WebKit now supports alpha masks in CSS. Masks allow you to overlay the content of a box with a pattern that can be used to knock out portions of that box in the final display. In other words, you can clip to complex shapes based off the alpha of an image. [...] We have introduced new properties to provide Web designers with a lot of control over these masks and how they are applied. The new properties are analogous to the background and border-image properties that already exist. -webkit-mask (background) -webkit-mask-attachment (background-attachment) -webkit-mask-clip (background-clip) -webkit-mask-origin (background-origin) -webkit-mask-image (background-image) -webkit-mask-repeat (background-repeat) -webkit-mask-composite (background-composite) -webkit-mask-box-image (border-image)


Is that part of any (yet-to-come) standard, as I didn't found any information unrelated to Webkit, or is it just Apple-flavour? It seems that the W3 is suggesting SVG for such usecases: w3.org/TR/SVG/masking.html
Sadly this seems to be webkit only and the blog cheats by using composited images rather than actual examples. This answer is a bit of red herring.
c
chrscblls

Think I have a solution for this that's a) exactly what you were looking for 5 years ago, and b) is a bit simpler than the other code options here.

With any white png (eg, white icon on transparent background), you can add an ::after selector to recolor.

.icon {
    background: url(img/icon.png); /* Your icon */
    position: relative; /* Allows an absolute positioned psuedo element */
}

.icon::after{
    position: absolute; /* Positions psuedo element relative to .icon */
    width: 100%; /* Same dimensions as .icon */
    height: 100%;
    content: ""; /* Allows psuedo element to show */
    background: #EC008C; /* The color you want the icon to change to */
    mix-blend-mode: multiply; /* Only apply color on top of white, use screen if icon is black */
}

See this codepen (applying the color swap on hover): http://codepen.io/chrscblls/pen/bwAXZO


I rehosted the image off of imgur, was having some troubles loading it.
In the latest version of Chrome, it looks like the (transparent) background is also getting set to the color. In the linked example, when I hover, I just see an opaque pink square... Works well in Firefox.
@chrscblls The link is dead.
U
Unknown artist

The img tag has a background property just like any other. If you have a white PNG with a transparent shape, like a stencil, then you can do this:

<img src= 'stencil.png' style= 'background-color: red'>

I want the white part colored differently, not the transparent part.
best solution I found so far. Too bad it will only work if you use a solid background-color on your websites
@Wesley you need to invert the image then (so the white bit becomes transparent and the rest white) which you can do using your favourite image editor and masks.
@CharlesGoodwin That only works then the image is placed in a white background.
J
John Slegers

In most browsers, you can use filters :

on both elements and background images of other elements

and set them either statically in your CSS, or dynamically using JavaScript

See demos below.

elements

You can apply this technique to a <img> element :

#original, #changed { width: 45%; padding: 2.5%; float: left; } #changed { -webkit-filter : hue-rotate(180deg); filter : hue-rotate(180deg); }

Background images

You can apply this technique to a background image :

#original, #changed { background: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/kaKzj.jpg'); background-size: cover; width: 30%; margin: 0 10% 0 10%; padding-bottom: 28%; float: left; } #changed { -webkit-filter : hue-rotate(180deg); filter : hue-rotate(180deg); }

JavaScript

You can use JavaScript to set a filter at runtime :

var element = document.getElementById("changed"); var filter = 'hue-rotate(120deg) saturate(2.4)'; element.style['-webkit-filter'] = filter; element.style['filter'] = filter; #original, #changed { margin: 0 10%; width: 30%; float: left; background: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/856IQ.png'); background-size: cover; padding-bottom: 25%; }


The question was about colorizing a white image with a transparent background. hue-rotate does not work on white.
S
Samuel stankiewicz

When changing a picture from black to white, or white to black the hue rotate filter does not work, because black and white are not technically colors. Instead, black and white color changes (from black to white or vice-versa) must be done with the invert filter property.

.img1 { filter: invert(100%); }


M
Muthukumar Anbalagan

I found this while googling, I found best working for me...

HTML

<div class="img"></div>

CSS

.img {
  background-color: red;
  width: 60px;
  height: 60px;
   -webkit-mask-image: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/gZvK4.png');
}

http://jsfiddle.net/a63b0exm/


This works, I voted Up. But just for the record it does have some problems like can´t size the background image, can´t position the image and it does repeat.
Ohh, I really didn't try those... try below link. developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/-webkit-mask-box-image thanks, Daniel
r
rolznz

I required a specific colour, so filter didn't work for me.

Instead, I created a div, exploiting CSS multiple background images and the linear-gradient function (which creates an image itself). If you use the overlay blend mode, your actual image will be blended with the generated "gradient" image containing your desired colour (here, #BADA55)

.colored-image { background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #BADA55, #BADA55), url("https://i.imgur.com/lYXT8R6.png"); background-blend-mode: overlay; background-size: contain; width: 200px; height: 200px; }


Didn't work for me. I can't tell why, I copy pasted exactly
@VicSeedoubleyew the snippet works fine. Inspect your div using dev tools to ensure your CSS is actually being applied. Also, make sure the URL to your image is valid if you're not using the one I provided. EDIT: If the snippet doesn't work for you, you might be using a browser that is either out of date or doesn't support the linear-gradient function.
S
Sven Eberth

Use this great codepen example that you insert your hex color value and it returns the needed filter to apply this color to png

CSS filter generator to convert from black to target hex color

for example i needed my png to have the following color #EF8C57

then you have to apply the following filter to you png Result:

filter: invert(76%) sepia(30%) saturate(3461%) hue-rotate(321deg) brightness(98%) contrast(91%);

Did you forget to link the codepen example? However, it's better to use the stack snippet to include all the code in the answer.
S
Salix

Answering because I was looking for a solution for this.

the pen in @chrscblls answer works well if you have a white or black background, but mine wasn't. Aslo, the images were generated with ng-repeat, so I couldn't have their url in my css AND you can't use ::after on img tags.

So, I figured a work around and thought it might help people if they too stumble here.

So what I did is pretty much the same with three main differences:

the url being in my img tag, I put it(and a label) in another div on which ::after will work.

the 'mix-blend-mode' is set at 'difference' instead of 'multiply' or 'screen'.

I added a ::before with exactly the same value so the ::after would do the 'difference' of the 'difference' made by the ::before and cancelled it-self.

To change it from black to white or white to black the background color need to be white. From black to colors, you can choose whatever color. From white to colors tho, you'll need to choose the opposite color of the one you want.

.divClass{
   position: relative;
   width: 100%;
   height: 100%;
   text-align: left;
}
.divClass:hover::after, .divClass:hover::before{
   position: absolute;
   width: 100%;
   height: 100%;
   background: #FFF;
   mix-blend-mode: difference;
   content: "";
}

https://codepen.io/spaceplant/pen/oZyMYG

Since I posted this answer I made an other pen using a different method :

* { box-sizing: border-box; } body { background-color: CadetBlue; font-family: "Lato", sans-serif; text-align: center; } button { display: flex; justify-content: center; min-width: 182px; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 2em auto; cursor: pointer; pointer-events: auto; border-radius: 4px; border: none; background: #85b5b7; box-shadow: 0 6px #6fa8aa; } label { font-weight: 400; font-size: 24px; margin: auto 0; color: white; } .icon { height: 64px; width: 64px; background-color: white; -webkit-mask-repeat: no-repeat; mask-repeat: no-repeat; -webkit-mask-position: left center; mask-position: left center; -webkit-mask-size: auto 48px; mask-size: auto 48px; mask-mode: luminance; -webkit-mask-image: url("https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/Bubbles-alt-icon.png/640px-Bubbles-alt-icon.png"); mask-image: url("https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/Bubbles-alt-icon.png/640px-Bubbles-alt-icon.png"); } button label span { color: #395f60; } button:hover { color: #395f60; transform: translatey(4px); box-shadow: 0 2px #6fa8aa; } button:hover .icon { background-color: #395f60; }


This solution does not allow anything to be 'under the icon' as it has solid background when changing the color
On the codepen linked, there's a link to an updated version using mask which works better and solve that problem.
@AdamPietrasiak Added link to pen and a snippet example. This method allow things under and, once every other browser catch up to firefox, to use luminence as alpha too!
oops haha, forgot what my original problem was, and this doesn't fix it since I couldn't have the url in my css... Well, guess I can add it with JS but I liked that I didn't have to ^^'
M
Mahdi Bashirpour

body{ background: #333 url(/images/classy_fabric.png); width: 430px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 30px; } .preview{ background: #ccc; width: 415px; height: 430px; border: solid 10px #fff; } input[type='radio'] { -webkit-appearance: none; -moz-appearance: none; width: 25px; height: 25px; margin: 5px 0 5px 5px; background-size: 225px 70px; position: relative; float: left; display: inline; top: 0; border-radius: 3px; z-index: 99999; cursor: pointer; box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px #000; } input[type='radio']:hover{ -webkit-filter: opacity(.4); filter: opacity(.4); } .red{ background: red; } .red:checked{ background: linear-gradient(brown, red) } .green{ background: green; } .green:checked{ background: linear-gradient(green, lime); } .yellow{ background: yellow; } .yellow:checked{ background: linear-gradient(orange, yellow); } .purple{ background: purple; } .pink{ background: pink; } .purple:checked{ background: linear-gradient(purple, violet); } .red:checked ~ img{ -webkit-filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red); filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red); } .green:checked ~ img{ -webkit-filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 green); filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 green); } .yellow:checked ~ img{ -webkit-filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 yellow); filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 yellow); } .purple:checked ~ img{ -webkit-filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 purple); filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 purple); } .pink:checked ~ img{ -webkit-filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 pink); filter: opacity(.5) drop-shadow(0 0 0 pink); } img{ width: 394px; height: 375px; position: relative; } .label{ width: 150px; height: 75px; position: absolute; top: 170px; margin-left: 130px; } ::selection{ background: #000; }

Source: https://codepen.io/taryaoui/pen/EKkcu


H
Hedam

Try this:

 -webkit-filter: brightness(0) invert(1);
 filter: brightness(0) invert(1); 

P
Pere

There's no need for a whole font set if you only need one icon, plus I feel it being more "clean" as an individual element. So, for this purpose, in HTML5 you can place a SVG directly inside the document flow. Then you can define a class in your .CSS stylesheet and access its background color with the fill property:

Working fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/qmsj0ez1/

Note that, in the example, I've used :hoverto illustrate the behaviour; if you just want to change color for the "normal" state, you should remove the pseudoclass.


A
Adam Pietrasiak

The solution that worked for me was using filter: drop-shadow

filter: drop-shadow works differently than regular box-shadow.

filter one applies shadow to real shape (so it supports transparent images).

The trick now is to 'hide' real image and show only the shadow.

https://jsfiddle.net/d4m8x0qb/2

https://i.stack.imgur.com/u5vsQ.png

Note that my use case is modifying icons colors into one, solid color, so this approach works for me, but might not for other use cases


b
beta208

To literally change the color, you could incorporate a CSS transition with a -webkit-filter where when something happens you would invoke the -webkit-filter of your choice. For example:

img {
    -webkit-filter:grayscale(0%);
    transition: -webkit-filter .3s linear;
    }
img:hover 
    {
    -webkit-filter:grayscale(75%);
    }

L
Lotanna Kyrian
/* change image color to white */
filter: invert(100%) sepia(16%) saturate(7463%) hue-rotate(222deg) brightness(119%) contrast(115%);

/* change image color to red */`
filter: invert(16%) sepia(99%) saturate(7404%) hue-rotate(4deg) brightness(95%) contrast(118%);

/* change image color to green */
filter: invert(26%) sepia(89%) saturate(1583%) hue-rotate(95deg) brightness(96%) contrast(106%);

/* change image color to blue */
filter: invert(10%) sepia(90%) saturate(5268%) hue-rotate(245deg) brightness(109%) contrast(155%);