ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

What is the easiest way to remove the first character from a string?

Example:

[12,23,987,43

What is the fastest, most efficient way to remove the "[", using maybe a chop() but for the first character?

I edited my answer, so it might be possible to change your selected answer. See if you can award it to Jason Stirk's answer since his is the fastest, and is very readable.
Use str[1..-1], its fastest according to the answers below.
As of Ruby 2.5 you can use delete_prefixand delete_prefix! - more details below. I've not had the time to benchmark, but will do soon!
Update: I've benchmarked the new methods (delete_prefix \ delete_prefix!) and they're pretty fast. The don't quite pip the previous favourites for speed, but readability means they're great new options to have!

J
Jason Stirk

Similar to Pablo's answer above, but a shade cleaner :

str[1..-1]

Will return the array from 1 to the last character.

'Hello World'[1..-1]
 => "ello World"

+1 Take a look at the benchmark results I added to my answer. You've got the fastest run-time, plus I think it's very clean.
What about the performance of str[1,] compared to the above?
@Bohr: str[1,] return you the 2nd character since the range is 1:nil. You'd need to provide the actual calculated length, or something guaranteeded to be higher than length, like, str[1,999999] (use int_max of course) to get the whole tail. [1..-1] is cleaner and probably faster, since you don't need to operate on length manually (see the [1..length] in the benchmark)
Very nice solution. By the way if one wants to remove first and last characters: str[1..-2]
t
the Tin Man

I kind of favor using something like:

asdf = "[12,23,987,43"
asdf[0] = '' 

p asdf
# >> "12,23,987,43"

I'm always looking for the fastest and most readable way of doing things:

require 'benchmark'

N = 1_000_000

puts RUBY_VERSION

STR = "[12,23,987,43"

Benchmark.bm(7) do |b|
  b.report('[0]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[0] = '' } }
  b.report('sub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[+/, "") } }

  b.report('gsub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('[1..-1]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..-1] } }
  b.report('slice') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".slice!(0) } }
  b.report('length') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..STR.length] } }

end

Running on my Mac Pro:

1.9.3
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.840000   0.000000   0.840000 (  0.847496)
sub       1.960000   0.010000   1.970000 (  1.962767)
gsub      4.350000   0.020000   4.370000 (  4.372801)
[1..-1]   0.710000   0.000000   0.710000 (  0.713366)
slice     1.020000   0.000000   1.020000 (  1.020336)
length    1.160000   0.000000   1.160000 (  1.157882)

Updating to incorporate one more suggested answer:

require 'benchmark'

N = 1_000_000

class String
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end

  def first(how_many = 1)
    self[0...how_many]
  end

  def shift(how_many = 1)
    shifted = first(how_many)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
    shifted
  end
  alias_method :shift!, :shift
end

class Array
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

puts RUBY_VERSION

STR = "[12,23,987,43"

Benchmark.bm(7) do |b|
  b.report('[0]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[0] = '' } }
  b.report('sub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[+/, "") } }

  b.report('gsub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('[1..-1]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..-1] } }
  b.report('slice') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".slice!(0) } }
  b.report('length') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..STR.length] } }
  b.report('eat!') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".eat! } }
  b.report('reverse') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".reverse.chop.reverse } }
end

Which results in:

2.1.2
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.300000   0.000000   0.300000 (  0.295054)
sub       0.630000   0.000000   0.630000 (  0.631870)
gsub      2.090000   0.000000   2.090000 (  2.094368)
[1..-1]   0.230000   0.010000   0.240000 (  0.232846)
slice     0.320000   0.000000   0.320000 (  0.320714)
length    0.340000   0.000000   0.340000 (  0.341918)
eat!      0.460000   0.000000   0.460000 (  0.452724)
reverse   0.400000   0.000000   0.400000 (  0.399465)

And another using /^./ to find the first character:

require 'benchmark'

N = 1_000_000

class String
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end

  def first(how_many = 1)
    self[0...how_many]
  end

  def shift(how_many = 1)
    shifted = first(how_many)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
    shifted
  end
  alias_method :shift!, :shift
end

class Array
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

puts RUBY_VERSION

STR = "[12,23,987,43"

Benchmark.bm(7) do |b|
  b.report('[0]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[0] = '' } }
  b.report('[/^./]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[/^./] = '' } }
  b.report('[/^\[/]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[/^\[/] = '' } }
  b.report('sub+') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[+/, "") } }
  b.report('sub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('gsub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('[1..-1]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..-1] } }
  b.report('slice') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".slice!(0) } }
  b.report('length') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..STR.length] } }
  b.report('eat!') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".eat! } }
  b.report('reverse') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".reverse.chop.reverse } }
end

Which results in:

# >> 2.1.5
# >>               user     system      total        real
# >> [0]       0.270000   0.000000   0.270000 (  0.270165)
# >> [/^./]    0.430000   0.000000   0.430000 (  0.432417)
# >> [/^\[/]   0.460000   0.000000   0.460000 (  0.458221)
# >> sub+      0.590000   0.000000   0.590000 (  0.590284)
# >> sub       0.590000   0.000000   0.590000 (  0.596366)
# >> gsub      1.880000   0.010000   1.890000 (  1.885892)
# >> [1..-1]   0.230000   0.000000   0.230000 (  0.223045)
# >> slice     0.300000   0.000000   0.300000 (  0.299175)
# >> length    0.320000   0.000000   0.320000 (  0.325841)
# >> eat!      0.410000   0.000000   0.410000 (  0.409306)
# >> reverse   0.390000   0.000000   0.390000 (  0.393044)

Here's another update on faster hardware and a newer version of Ruby:

2.3.1
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.200000   0.000000   0.200000 (  0.204307)
[/^./]    0.390000   0.000000   0.390000 (  0.387527)
[/^\[/]   0.360000   0.000000   0.360000 (  0.360400)
sub+      0.490000   0.000000   0.490000 (  0.492083)
sub       0.480000   0.000000   0.480000 (  0.487862)
gsub      1.990000   0.000000   1.990000 (  1.988716)
[1..-1]   0.180000   0.000000   0.180000 (  0.181673)
slice     0.260000   0.000000   0.260000 (  0.266371)
length    0.270000   0.000000   0.270000 (  0.267651)
eat!      0.400000   0.010000   0.410000 (  0.398093)
reverse   0.340000   0.000000   0.340000 (  0.344077)

Why is gsub so slow?

After doing a search/replace, gsub has to check for possible additional matches before it can tell if it's finished. sub only does one and finishes. Consider gsub like it's a minimum of two sub calls.

Also, it's important to remember that gsub, and sub can also be handicapped by poorly written regex which match much more slowly than a sub-string search. If possible anchor the regex to get the most speed from it. There are answers here on Stack Overflow demonstrating that so search around if you want more information.


It's important to note that this will only work in Ruby 1.9. In Ruby 1.8, this will remove the first byte from the string, not the first character, which is not what the OP wants.
+1: I always forget that to a string-position you can assign not only a single character, but also you can insert a substring. Thanks!
"[12,23,987,43".delete "["
That deletes it from all positions, which isn't what the OP wanted: "...for the first character?".
"what about "[12,23,987,43".shift ?"? What about "[12,23,987,43".shift NoMethodError: undefined method shift' for "[12,23,987,43":String`?
C
Charlie Egan

We can use slice to do this:

val = "abc"
 => "abc" 
val.slice!(0)
 => "a" 
val
 => "bc" 

Using slice! we can delete any character by specifying its index.


This elegant slice!(0) really should be the selected answer, as using asdf[0] = '' to remove the first character is ridiculous (just like using gsub with regex and shooting a fly with a howitzer).
While it might seem unintuitive on the surface, []= doesn't require as much underlying C code, where slice! requires additional work. That adds up. The argument might be "Which is more readable?" I find using []= readable, but I'm coming from a C --> Perl background which probably colors my thinking. Java developers would probably think it's less readable. Either is an acceptable way to accomplish the task as long as it's easily understood and maintainable and doesn't load the CPU unduly.
Ok. Do you know how we can measure up if a function takes much CPU load in ROR? or should we use execution time difference in milli or nanoseconds?
S
SRack

Ruby 2.5+

As of Ruby 2.5 you can use delete_prefix or delete_prefix! to achieve this in a readable manner.

In this case "[12,23,987,43".delete_prefix("[").

More info here:

Official docs

https://blog.jetbrains.com/ruby/2017/10/10-new-features-in-ruby-2-5/

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12694

'invisible'.delete_prefix('in') #=> "visible"
'pink'.delete_prefix('in') #=> "pink"

N.B. you can also use this to remove items from the end of a string with delete_suffix and delete_suffix!

'worked'.delete_suffix('ed') #=> "work"
'medical'.delete_suffix('ed') #=> "medical"

Docs

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13665

Edit:

Using the Tin Man's benchmark setup, it looks pretty quick too (under the last two entries delete_p and delete_p!). Doesn't quite pip the previous faves for speed, though is very readable.

2.5.0
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.174766   0.000489   0.175255 (  0.180207)
[/^./]    0.318038   0.000510   0.318548 (  0.323679)
[/^\[/]   0.372645   0.001134   0.373779 (  0.379029)
sub+      0.460295   0.001510   0.461805 (  0.467279)
sub       0.498351   0.001534   0.499885 (  0.505729)
gsub      1.669837   0.005141   1.674978 (  1.682853)
[1..-1]   0.199840   0.000976   0.200816 (  0.205889)
slice     0.279661   0.000859   0.280520 (  0.285661)
length    0.268362   0.000310   0.268672 (  0.273829)
eat!      0.341715   0.000524   0.342239 (  0.347097)
reverse   0.335301   0.000588   0.335889 (  0.340965)
delete_p  0.222297   0.000832   0.223129 (  0.228455)
delete_p!  0.225798   0.000747   0.226545 (  0.231745)

s
schmijos

I prefer this:

str = "[12,23,987,43"
puts str[1..-1]
>> 12,23,987,43

You might want to check other answers before repeating them. This was already suggested by stackoverflow.com/a/3614642/128421
C
Chris Heald

If you always want to strip leading brackets:

"[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "")

If you just want to remove the first character, and you know it won't be in a multibyte character set:

"[12,23,987,43"[1..-1]

or

"[12,23,987,43".slice(1..-1)

I'd use "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[+/, "") instead of gsub(/^\[/, ""). The first lets the regex engine find all matches then they're replaced in one action and results in about a 2x improvement in speed with Ruby 1.9.3.
Since we're dealing with strings, should this be gsub(/\A\[/, "") ?
t
the Tin Man

Inefficient alternative:

str.reverse.chop.reverse

R
Rubyist

For example : a = "One Two Three"

1.9.2-p290 > a = "One Two Three"
 => "One Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "ne Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "e Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => " Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "wo Three" 

In this way you can remove one by one first character of the string.


This is the same as Jason Stirk's answer only his was submitted many months before.
P
Pablo Fernandez

Easy way:

str = "[12,23,987,43"

removed = str[1..str.length]

Awesome way:

class String
  def reverse_chop()
    self[1..self.length]
  end
end

"[12,23,987,43".reverse_chop()

(Note: prefer the easy way :) )


If you want to preserve the "chop" semantics you could just "[12,23,987,43".reverse.chop.reverse
that is a pretty big performance overhead just to strip one char
why not use [1..-1] rather than [1..self.length] ?
Monkey patching example is pretty off for this question, it is just irrelevant and ugly IMO.
b
brookr

Thanks to @the-tin-man for putting together the benchmarks!

Alas, I don't really like any of those solutions. Either they require an extra step to get the result ([0] = '', .strip!) or they aren't very semantic/clear about what's happening ([1..-1]: "Um, a range from 1 to negative 1? Yearg?"), or they are slow or lengthy to write out (.gsub, .length).

What we are attempting is a 'shift' (in Array parlance), but returning the remaining characters, rather than what was shifted off. Let's use our Ruby to make this possible with strings! We can use the speedy bracket operation, but give it a good name, and take an arg to specify how much we want to chomp off the front:

class String
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

But there is more we can do with that speedy-but-unwieldy bracket operation. While we are at it, for completeness, let's write a #shift and #first for String (why should Array have all the fun‽‽), taking an arg to specify how many characters we want to remove from the beginning:

class String
  def first(how_many = 1)
    self[0...how_many]
  end

  def shift(how_many = 1)
    shifted = first(how_many)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
    shifted
  end
  alias_method :shift!, :shift
end

Ok, now we have a good clear way of pulling characters off the front of a string, with a method that is consistent with Array#first and Array#shift (which really should be a bang method??). And we can easily get the modified string as well with #eat!. Hm, should we share our new eat!ing power with Array? Why not!

class Array
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

Now we can:

> str = "[12,23,987,43" #=> "[12,23,987,43"
> str.eat!              #=> "12,23,987,43"
> str                   #=> "12,23,987,43"

> str.eat!(3)           #=> "23,987,43"
> str                   #=> "23,987,43"

> str.first(2)          #=> "23"
> str                   #=> "23,987,43"

> str.shift!(3)         #=> "23,"
> str                   #=> "987,43"

> arr = [1,2,3,4,5]     #=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 
> arr.eat!              #=> [2, 3, 4, 5] 
> arr                   #=> [2, 3, 4, 5] 

That's better!


I remember a discussion years ago in Perl forums about such a function with the name of chip() instead of chop() (and chimp() as the analog of chomp()).
H
Handcraftsman
str = "[12,23,987,43"

str[0] = ""

It's important to note that this will only work in Ruby 1.9. In Ruby 1.8, this will remove the first byte from the string, not the first character, which is not what the OP wants.
J
Josh Brody
class String
  def bye_felicia()
    felicia = self.strip[0] #first char, not first space.
    self.sub(felicia, '')
  end
end

What did Felicia do to you to deserve this code Haiku?
S
Sagar Pandya

Using regex:

str = 'string'
n = 1  #to remove first n characters

str[/.{#{str.size-n}}\z/] #=> "tring"

z
zeitchef

I find a nice solution to be str.delete(str[0]) for its readability, though I cannot attest to it's performance.


A
Aaron Henderson

list = [1,2,3,4] list.drop(1) # => [2,3,4]

List drops one or more elements from the start of the array, does not mutate the array, and returns the array itself instead of the dropped element.