I have a remote Git server, here is the scenario which I want to perform:
For each bug/feature I create a different Git branch
I keep on committing my code in that Git branch with un-official Git messages
In top repository we have to do one commit for one bug with official Git message
So how can I merge my branch to remote branch so that they get just one commit for all my check-ins (I even want to provide commit message for this)?
git merge --squash
does it all on the command line in one shot and you just hope it works. git rebase -i
brings up an editor and lets you fine-tune the rebase. It's slower, but you can see what you're doing. Also, there are difference between rebase and merge which are a little too involved to address in a comment.
merge --squash
from the old to the new one, and then merge the new branch to master. The old branch becomes obsolete.
Say your bug fix branch is called bugfix
and you want to merge it into master
:
git checkout master
git merge --squash bugfix
git commit
This will take all the commits from the bugfix
branch, squash them into 1 commit, and merge it with your master
branch.
Explanation:
git checkout master
Switches to your master
branch.
git merge --squash bugfix
Takes all commits from the bugfix
branch and groups it for a 1 commit with your current branch.
(no merge commit appears; you could resolve conflicts manually before following commit)
git commit
Creates a single commit from the merged changes.
Omitting the -m
parameter lets you modify a draft commit message containing every message from your squashed commits before finalizing your commit.
What finally cleared this up for me was a comment showing that:
git checkout main
git merge --squash feature
is the equivalent of doing:
git checkout feature
git diff main > feature.patch
git checkout main
patch -p1 < feature.patch
git add .
When I want to merge a feature branch with 105(!!) commits and have them all squashed into one, I don't want to git rebase -i origin/master
because I need to separately resolve merge conflicts for each of the intermediate commits (or at least the ones which git can't figure out itself). Using git merge --squash
gets me the result I want, of a single commit for merging an entire feature branch. And, I only need to do at most one manual conflict resolution.
git merge master
, and only then git merge --squash feature
in the master branch.
git merge --squash feature
from the master branch?
You want to merge with the squash option. That's if you want to do it one branch at a time.
git merge --squash feature1
If you want to merge all the branches at the same time as single commits, then first rebase interactively and squash each feature then octopus merge:
git checkout feature1
git rebase -i master
Squash into one commit then repeat for the other features.
git checkout master
git merge feature1 feature2 feature3 ...
That last merge is an "octopus merge" because it's merging a lot of branches at once.
Hope this helps
Merge newFeature
branch into master
with a custom commit:
git merge --squash newFeature && git commit -m 'Your custom commit message';
If instead, you do
git merge --squash newFeature && git commit
you will get a commit message that will include all the newFeature
branch commits, which you can customize.
I explain it thoroughly here: https://youtu.be/FQNAIacelT4
Suppose you worked in feature/task1 with multiple commits.
Go to your project branch (project/my_project) git checkout project/my_project Create a new branch (feature/task1_bugfix) git checkout -b feature/task1_bugfix Merge with the --squash option git merge --squash feature/task1 Create a single commit git commit -am "add single comments" Push your branch git push --set-upstream origin feature/task1_bugfix
If you have already git merge bugfix
on main
, you can squash your merge commit into one with:
git reset --soft HEAD^1
git commit
git reset --soft HEAD^1
seems to undo the last commit performed before the merge, at least in case of the merge being a fast-forward.
git reset --soft HEAD^<number-of-commits-to-squash>
.
I know this question isn't about Github specifically, but since Github is so widely used and this is the answer I was looking for, I'll share it here.
Github has the ability to perform squash merges, depending on the merge options enabled for the repository.
If squash merges are enabled, the "Squash and merge" option should appear in the dropdown under the "Merge" button.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/gxz2l.png
To squash your local branch before pushing it:
checkout the branch in question to work on if it is not already checked out. Find the sha of the oldest commit you wish to keep. Create/checkout a new branch (tmp1) from that commit. git checkout -b tmp1
For Git
Create a new feature
via Terminal/Shell:
git checkout origin/feature/<featurename>
git merge --squash origin/feature/<featurename>
This doesnt commit it, allows you to review it first.
Then commit, and finish feature from this new branch, and delete/ignore the old one (the one you did dev on).
git checkout YOUR_RELEASE_BRANCH
git pull
git checkout -b A_NEW_BRANCH
git merge --squash YOUR_BRANCH_WITH_MULTIPLE_COMMITS
git commit -am "squashing all commits into one"
git push --set-upstream origin A_NEW_BRANCH
pull
. All the other responses seem to assume that nothing has changed in the remote release branch since the last time you were hanging out on it....
if you get error: Committing is not possible because you have unmerged files.
git checkout master
git merge --squash bugfix
git add .
git commit -m "Message"
fixed all the Conflict files
git add .
you could also use
git add [filename]
Your feature branch is done and ready to commit to master, develop or other target branch with only one commit
Go to merge branch : git checkout master && git pull
Create a work branch from your clean local master : git checkout -b work
Merge squash your feature branch on work : git merge --squash your_feature_branch.
Commit with default or a new message : git commit (with a specific or default message)
Go back to your feature branch : git checkout your_feature_branch
Point your feature branch to work dir : git reset --hard work
Verify but you are ready to push : git push -f
Then clean up work branch if needed
Replace master with your target branch : develop and so on
No need to specify how many commit from your master to your feature branch. Git takes care*
Assume the name of the branch where you made multiple commits is called bugfix/123, and you want to squash these commits. First, create a new branch from develop (or whatever the name of your repo is). Assume the name of the new branch is called bugfix/123_up. Checkout this branch in git bash -
git fetch
git checkout bugfix/123_up
git merge bugfix/123 --squash
git commit -m "your message"
git push origin bugfix/123_up
Now this branch will have only one commit with all your changes in it.
You can use tool I've created to make this process easier: git-squash. For example to squash all commits on feature branch that has been branched from master branch, write:
git squash master
git push --force
Use
git status
to check what's going on.
Then
git checkout master
git merge --squash bugfix
git add (add which files you want or use wildcard command like ".")
Then
git commit -m "message"
And now last but not the least
git push -u origin master
Here origin
can be other remote you prefer.
Success story sharing
git commit
(without-m
param) and you will get to modify a drafted commit message containing all commit messages that you squashed.git commit --amend -m '...'
later on.git commit
will no longer show the useful commit message containing all commit messages you squashed. In that case, trygit commit --file .git/SQUASH_MSG
(via stackoverflow.com/a/11230783/923560 ).git commit -a --author="Author" --message="Issue title #id"
git merge --squash
allows you to create a single commit on top of the current branch whose effect is the same as merging another branch. But it won't produce the merge record, which means your pull-request as result would have no changes, yet won't be marked as merged! So, you will need just to delete that branch to be done.