ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

How can I update the parent's state in React?

My structure looks as follows:

Component 1

 - |- Component 2


 - - |- Component 4


 - - -  |- Component 5

Component 3

Component 3 should display some data depending on state of Component 5.

Since props are immutable, I can't simply save its state in Component 1 and forward it, right? And yes, I've read about Redux, but I don't want to use it. I hope that it's possible to solve it just with react. Am I wrong?

super-easy: pass the parent-setState-Function via property to the child-component: {this.setState(p)}} /> In the child-component call it via this.props.setState({myObj,...});
<MyChildComponent setState={(s,c)=>{this.setState(s, c)}} /> if your going to use this hack make sure you support the callback.
Passing a callback to set the parent's state is a really bad practice that could lead to maintenance problems. It breaks encapsulation and it makes components 2 4 and 5 tightly coupled to 1. If walk this path then you won't be able to reuse any of these child components elsewhere. It's better you have specific props so child components could trigger events whenever something happens, then the parent component would handle that event properly.
@MarcelEnnix, why the curly brackets around this.setState(p) ? I tried without them and it appears to work (I'm very new to React)
@Biganon Hmm. You are right. Sorry for that 2 extra chars :-) Maybe its because i like Curly Brackets so much. I have a Shirt printed with this Statement^^

c
crg

For child-parent communication you should pass a function setting the state from parent to child, like this


class Parent extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.handler = this.handler.bind(this)
  }

  handler() {
    this.setState({
      someVar: 'some value'
    })
  }

  render() {
    return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
  }
}

class Child extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <Button onClick = {this.props.handler}/ >
  }
}

This way the child can update the parent's state with the call of a function passed with props.

But you will have to rethink your components' structure, because as I understand components 5 and 3 are not related.

One possible solution is to wrap them in a higher level component which will contain the state of both component 1 and 3. This component will set the lower level state through props.


why do you need this.handler = this.handler.bind(this) and not just the handler function that sets the state?
@chemook78 in ES6 React classes methods do not auto-bind to class. So if we don't add this.handler = this.handler.bind(this) in constructor, this inside the handler function will reference the function closure, not the class. If don't want to bind all your functions in constructor, there are two more ways to deal with this using arrow functions. You could just write the click handler as onClick={()=> this.setState(...)}, or you could use property initialisers together with arrow functions as described here babeljs.io/blog/2015/06/07/react-on-es6-plus under "Arrow functions"
Here's an example of this in action: plnkr.co/edit/tGWecotmktae8zjS5yEr?p=preview
That all makes sense, why e.preventDefault ? and does that require jquery?
Quick question, does this disallow the assignment of a local state within the child?
M
Mdev

This is how to do it with the new useState hook.

Method - Pass the state changer function as a props to the child component and do whatever you want to do with the function:

import React, {useState} from 'react';

const ParentComponent = () => {
  const[state, setState]=useState('');
  
  return(
    <ChildComponent stateChanger={setState} />
  )
}


const ChildComponent = ({stateChanger, ...rest}) => {
  return(
    <button onClick={() => stateChanger('New data')}></button>
  )
}

Nice modern example
Thanks. @mylesthe.dev
for some strange reason., Iam getting stateChanger (setState) is not a function. I used same exact code
The props you passed to stateChanger is not a function. Or you have done anything wrong. Share your code.
Welcome @MichaelWegter
P
Peter Mortensen

I found the following working solution to pass the onClick function argument from the child to the parent component:

Version with passing a method()

//ChildB component
class ChildB extends React.Component {

    render() {

        var handleToUpdate = this.props.handleToUpdate;
        return (<div><button onClick={() => handleToUpdate('someVar')}>
            Push me
          </button>
        </div>)
    }
}

//ParentA component
class ParentA extends React.Component {

    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate.bind(this);
        var arg1 = '';
    }

    handleToUpdate(someArg){
        alert('We pass argument from Child to Parent: ' + someArg);
        this.setState({arg1:someArg});
    }

    render() {
        var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate;

        return (<div>
                    <ChildB handleToUpdate = {handleToUpdate.bind(this)} /></div>)
    }
}

if(document.querySelector("#demo")){
    ReactDOM.render(
        <ParentA />,
        document.querySelector("#demo")
    );
}

Look at JSFiddle

Version with passing an Arrow function

//ChildB component
class ChildB extends React.Component {

    render() {

        var handleToUpdate = this.props.handleToUpdate;
        return (<div>
          <button onClick={() => handleToUpdate('someVar')}>
            Push me
          </button>
        </div>)
    }
}

//ParentA component
class ParentA extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
    }

    handleToUpdate = (someArg) => {
            alert('We pass argument from Child to Parent: ' + someArg);
    }

    render() {
        return (<div>
            <ChildB handleToUpdate = {this.handleToUpdate} /></div>)
    }
}

if(document.querySelector("#demo")){
    ReactDOM.render(
        <ParentA />,
        document.querySelector("#demo")
    );
}

Look at JSFiddle


This one is good! could you explain this piece: <ChildB handleToUpdate = {handleToUpdate.bind(this)} /> Why had to bind again ?
@Dane - you have to bind the context of this to be the parent so that when this is called inside the child, this refers to the parent's state and not the child's. This is closure at its finest!
@Casey but aren't we doing that in the constructor ? And isn't that enough ??
You're totally right! I missed that. Yes, if you did it in the constructor already then you're good to go!
You're a legend mate! This'll keep components nicely self contained without having to be forced to create parent components to handle the state exchanges
A
Ardhi

I want to thank the most upvoted answer for giving me the idea of my own problem basically the variation of it with arrow function and passing param from child component:

 class Parent extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)
    // without bind, replaced by arrow func below
  }

  handler = (val) => {
    this.setState({
      someVar: val
    })
  }

  render() {
    return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
  }
}

class Child extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <Button onClick = {() => this.props.handler('the passing value')}/ >
  }
}

Hope it helps someone.


whats special about the arrow function over direct call ?
@AshishKamble the this in arrow functions refers to the parent's context (i.e. Parent class).
This is a duplicate answer. You could add a comment to the accepted answer and mention about this experimental feature to use arrow function in class.
What is (was) the most upvoted answer? Can you be more specific? The most upvoted answer may change over time.
P
Peter Mortensen

I like the answer regarding passing functions around. It's a very handy technique.

On the flip side you can also achieve this using pub/sub or using a variant, a dispatcher, as Flux does. The theory is super simple. Have component 5 dispatch a message which component 3 is listening for. Component 3 then updates its state which triggers the re-render. This requires stateful components, which, depending on your viewpoint, may or may not be an anti-pattern. I'm against them personally and would rather that something else is listening for dispatches and changes state from the very top-down (Redux does this, but it adds additional terminology).

import { Dispatcher } from 'flux'
import { Component } from 'React'

const dispatcher = new Dispatcher()

// Component 3
// Some methods, such as constructor, omitted for brevity
class StatefulParent extends Component {
  state = {
    text: 'foo'
  } 

  componentDidMount() {
    dispatcher.register( dispatch => {
      if ( dispatch.type === 'change' ) {
        this.setState({ text: 'bar' })
      }
    }
  }

  render() {
    return <h1>{ this.state.text }</h1>
  }
}

// Click handler
const onClick = event => {
  dispatcher.dispatch({
    type: 'change'
  })
}

// Component 5 in your example
const StatelessChild = props => {
  return <button onClick={ onClick }>Click me</button> 
}

The dispatcher bundles with Flux is very simple. It simply registers callbacks and invokes them when any dispatch occurs, passing through the contents on the dispatch (in the above terse example there is no payload with the dispatch, simply a message id). You could adapt this to traditional pub/sub (e.g., using the EventEmitter from events, or some other version) very easily if that makes more sense to you.


My Reacts components are "running" in browser like in an official tutorial (facebook.github.io/react/docs/tutorial.html) I tried to include Flux with browserify, but browser says, that Dispatcher is not found :(
The syntax I used was ES2016 module syntax which requires transpilation (I use Babel, but there are others, the babelify transform can be used with browserify), it transpiles to var Dispatcher = require( 'flux' ).Dispatcher
P
Peter Mortensen

I found the following working solution to pass the onClick function argument from the child to the parent component with a parameter:

Parent class:

class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    // Bind the this context to the handler function
    this.handler = this.handler.bind(this);

    // Set some state
    this.state = {
        messageShown: false
    };
}

// This method will be sent to the child component
handler(param1) {
console.log(param1);
    this.setState({
        messageShown: true
    });
}

// Render the child component and set the action property with the handler as value
render() {
    return <Child action={this.handler} />
}}

Child class:

class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
    return (
        <div>
            {/* The button will execute the handler function set by the parent component */}
            <Button onClick={this.props.action.bind(this,param1)} />
        </div>
    )
} }

Can anyone tell whether that's an acceptable solution (particularly interested in passing the parameter as suggested).
param1 is just display on console not get assign it always assigns true
I can't speak to the quality of the solution, but this successfully passes the param for me.
P
Peter Mortensen

Whenever you require to communicate between a child to the parent at any level down, then it's better to make use of context. In the parent component define the context that can be invoked by the child, such as:

In the parent component, in your case component 3,

static childContextTypes = {
    parentMethod: React.PropTypes.func.isRequired
};

getChildContext() {
    return {
        parentMethod: (parameter_from_child) => this.parentMethod(parameter_from_child)
    };
}

parentMethod(parameter_from_child){
    // Update the state with parameter_from_child
}

Now in the child component (component 5 in your case), just tell this component that it wants to use the context of its parent.

static contextTypes = {
    parentMethod: React.PropTypes.func.isRequired
};

render() {
    return(
        <TouchableHighlight
            onPress = {() => this.context.parentMethod(new_state_value)}
            underlayColor='gray' >

            <Text> update state in parent component </Text>

        </TouchableHighlight>
)}

You can find the Demo project in this GitHub repository.


I cant able to understand this answer, can you explain more about it
P
Peter Mortensen

It seems that we can only pass data from parent to child as React promotes unidirectional data flow, but to make the parent update itself when something happens in its "child component", we generally use what is called a "callback function".

We pass the function defined in the parent to the child as "props" and call that function from the child triggering it in the parent component.

class Parent extends React.Component {
  handler = (Value_Passed_From_SubChild) => {
    console.log("Parent got triggered when a grandchild button was clicked");
    console.log("Parent->Child->SubChild");
    console.log(Value_Passed_From_SubChild);
  }
  render() {
    return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
  }
}

class Child extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <SubChild handler = {this.props.handler}/ >
  }
}

class SubChild extends React.Component {
  constructor(props){
   super(props);
   this.state = {
      somethingImp : [1,2,3,4]
   }
  }
  render() {
     return <button onClick = {this.props.handler(this.state.somethingImp)}>Clickme<button/>
  }
}
React.render(<Parent />,document.getElementById('app'));

 HTML
 ----
 <div id="app"></div>

In this example we can make data pass from sub child → child → parent by passing function to its direct child.


P
Peter Mortensen

Most of the answers given previously are for React.Component-based designs. If you are using useState in the recent upgrades of the React library, then follow this answer.


P
Peter Mortensen

I've used a top rated answer from this page many times, but while learning React, I've found a better way to do that, without binding and without an inline function inside props.

Just look here:

class Parent extends React.Component {

  constructor() {
    super();
    this.state = {
      someVar: value
    }
  }

  handleChange = (someValue) => {
    this.setState({someVar: someValue})
  }

  render() {
    return <Child handler={this.handleChange} />
  }

}

export const Child = ({handler}) => {
  return <Button onClick={handler} />
}

The key is in an arrow function:

handleChange = (someValue) => {
  this.setState({someVar: someValue})
}

You can read more here.


P
Peter Mortensen

We can create ParentComponent and with a handleInputChange method to update the ParentComponent state. Import the ChildComponent and we pass two props from the parent to the child component i.e., the handleInputChange function and count.

import React, { Component } from 'react';
import ChildComponent from './ChildComponent';

class ParentComponent extends Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props);
    this.handleInputChange = this.handleInputChange.bind(this);
    this.state = {
      count: '',
    };
  }

  handleInputChange(e) {
    const { value, name } = e.target;
    this.setState({ [name]: value });
  }

  render() {
    const { count } = this.state;
    return (
      <ChildComponent count={count} handleInputChange={this.handleInputChange} />
    );
  }
}

Now we create the ChildComponent file and save it as ChildComponent.jsx. This component is stateless because the child component doesn't have a state. We use the prop-types library for props type checking.

import React from 'react';
import { func, number } from 'prop-types';

const ChildComponent = ({ handleInputChange, count }) => (
  <input onChange={handleInputChange} value={count} name="count" />
);

ChildComponent.propTypes = {
  count: number,
  handleInputChange: func.isRequired,
};

ChildComponent.defaultProps = {
  count: 0,
};

export default ChildComponent;

How does this work when the child has a child that affects the prop of its parent?
P
Peter Mortensen

If you want to update the parent component,

class ParentComponent extends React.Component {
    constructor(props){
        super(props);
        this.state = {
           page: 0
        }
    }

    handler(val){
        console.log(val) // 1
    }

    render(){
        return (
            <ChildComponent onChange={this.handler} />
        )
    }
}


class ChildComponent extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        this.state = {
             page: 1
        };
    }

    someMethod = (page) => {
        this.setState({ page: page });
        this.props.onChange(page)
    }

    render() {
        return (
            <Button
                onClick={() => this.someMethod()}
            > Click
        </Button>
      )
   }
}

Here onChange is an attribute with "handler" method bound to its instance. We passed the method handler to the Child class component, to receive via the onChange property in its props argument.

The attribute onChange will be set in a props object like this:

props = {
    onChange: this.handler
}

and passed to the child component.

So the child component can access the value of name in the props object like this props.onChange.

It's done through the use of render props.

Now the child component has a button “Click” with an onclick event set to call the handler method passed to it via onChange in its props argument object. So now this.props.onChange in the child holds the output method in the parent class.

Reference and credits: Bits and Pieces


Sorry.. for delay, Here onChange is an attribute with "handler" method bound to it's instance. we passed the method handler to the Child class component, to receive via onChange property in its props argument. The attribute onChange will be set in a props object like this: props ={ onChange : this.handler } and passed to the child component So the Child component can access the value of name in the props object like this props.onChange Its done through the use of render props. Reference and credits: [blog.bitsrc.io/…
P
Peter Mortensen

If this same scenario is not spread everywhere you can use React's context, especially if you don't want to introduce all the overhead that state management libraries introduce. Plus, it's easier to learn. But be careful; you could overuse it and start writing bad code. Basically you define a Container component (that will hold and keep that piece of state for you) making all the components interested in writing/reading that piece of data to/from its children (not necessarily direct children).

Context - React

You could also use a plain React properly instead.

<Component5 onSomethingHappenedIn5={this.props.doSomethingAbout5} />

Pass doSomethingAbout5 up to Component 1:

<Component1>
    <Component2 onSomethingHappenedIn5={somethingAbout5 => this.setState({somethingAbout5})}/>
    <Component5 propThatDependsOn5={this.state.somethingAbout5}/>
<Component1/>

If this is a common problem, you should starting thinking moving the whole state of the application to somewhere else. You have a few options, the most common are:

Redux

Flux

Basically, instead of managing the application state in your component you send commands when something happens to get the state updated. Components pull the state from this container as well so all the data is centralized. This doesn't mean you can't use local state any more, but that's a more advanced topic.


P
Peter Mortensen

We can set the parent state from a child component by passing a function into the child component as props as below:

class Parent extends React.Component{
    state = { term : ''}

     onInputChange = (event) => {
         this.setState({term: event.target.value});
     }

     onFormSubmit = (event) => {
         event.preventDefault();
         this.props.onFormSubmit(this.state.term);
     }

     render(){
         return (
             <Child onInputChange={this.onInputChange} onFormSubmit=
                {this.onFormSubmit} />
         )
     }
}


class Child extends React.Component{

     render(){
         return (
             <div className="search-bar ui segment">
                 <form className="ui form" onSubmit={this.props.onFormSubmit}>
                     <div class="field">
                         <label>Search Video</label>
                         <input type="text" value={this.state.term} onChange=
                             {this.props.onInputChange} />
                     </div>
                 </form>
             </div>
         )
     }
}

This way, the child will update the parent state onInputChange and onFormSubmit are props passed from parents. This can be called from event listeners in the child, hence the state will get updated there.


c
crg

Here is a short snippet to get two ways binding data.

The counter show the value from the parent and is updated from the child

class Parent extends React.Component { constructor(props) { super(props) this.handler = this.handler.bind(this) this.state = { count: 0 } } handler() { this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 }) } render() { return } } class Child extends React.Component { render() { return } } ReactDOM.render(, document.getElementById("root"));


P
Peter Mortensen

This is the way I do it:

type ParentProps = {}
type ParentState = { someValue: number }
class Parent extends React.Component<ParentProps, ParentState> {
    constructor(props: ParentProps) {
        super(props)
        this.state = { someValue: 0 }

        this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this)
    }

    handleChange(value: number) {
        this.setState({...this.state, someValue: value})
    }

    render() {
        return <div>
            <Child changeFunction={this.handleChange} defaultValue={this.state.someValue} />
            <p>Value: {this.state.someValue}</p>
        </div>
    }
}

type ChildProps = { defaultValue: number, changeFunction: (value: number) => void}
type ChildState = { anotherValue: number }
class Child extends React.Component<ChildProps, ChildState> {
    constructor(props: ChildProps) {
        super(props)
        this.state = { anotherValue: this.props.defaultValue }

        this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this)
    }

    handleChange(value: number) {
        this.setState({...this.state, anotherValue: value})
        this.props.changeFunction(value)
    }

    render() {
        return <div>
            <input onChange={event => this.handleChange(Number(event.target.value))} type='number' value={this.state.anotherValue}/>
        </div>
    }
}

What is the idea here? Can someone elaborate?
P
Peter Mortensen

As per your question, I understand that you need to display some conditional data in Component 3 which is based on the state of Component 5. Approach:

The state of Component 3 will hold a variable to check whether Component 5's state has that data An arrow function which will change Component 3's state variable. Passing an arrow function to Component 5 with props. Component 5 has an arrow function which will change Component 3's state variable An arrow function of Component 5 called on loading itself

Class Component3 extends React.Component { state = { someData = true } checkForData = (result) => { this.setState({someData : result}) } render() { if(this.state.someData) { return( //Other Data ); } else { return( //Other Data ); } } } export default Component3; class Component5 extends React.Component { state = { dataValue = "XYZ" } checkForData = () => { if(this.state.dataValue === "XYZ") { this.props.hasData(true); } else { this.props.hasData(false); } } render() { return(

//Conditional Data
); } } export default Component5;


B
Basir Payenda

Simply pass the parent's setState function via props to the child component.

function ParentComp() {
  const [searchValue, setSearchValue] = useState("");
  return <SearchBox setSearchValue={setSearchValue} searchValue={searchValue} />;
}

then in child component:

function SearchBox({ searchValue, setSearchValue }) {
  return (
        <input
          id="search-post"
          type="text"
          value={searchValue}
          onChange={(e) => setSearchValue(e.target.value)}
          placeholder="Search Blogs ..."
        />
    )
}

A second example to handle click from child component:

// We've below function and component in parent component
const clickHandler = (val) => {
  alert(`httpRequest sent. \nValue Received: ${val}`);
};

// JSX
<HttpRequest clickHandler={clickHandler} />

this is how you get function from parent component then pass a value and fire clickHandler through it.

function HttpRequest({ clickHandler }) {
  const [content, setContent] = useState("initialState");

  return (
    <button onClick={() => clickHandler(content)}>
      Send Request
    </button>
  );
}

export default HttpRequest;

a
ali orooji

To set state of parent in the child you can use callback.

const Child = ({handleClick}) => (
    <button on click={() => handleClick('some vale')}>change value</button>
)

const parent = () => {
    const [value, setValue] = useState(null)

    return <Child handleClick={setValue} />
}

In your structure it seems Components 1 an 3 are brothers. So you has 3 options:

1- Put the state into the parent of them(not recommended for 4 layer parent-child).

2- Use useContext and useRducer(or useState) together.

3- Use state managers like redux, mobx ...


a
atazmin

This seem to work for me

Parent:

...

const [open, setOpen] = React.useState(false);

const handleDrawerClose = () => {
    setOpen(false);
  };

...

return (
                <PrimaryNavigationAccordion           
                  handleDrawerClose={handleDrawerClose}               
                />
              );

Child:

...

export default function PrimaryNavigationAccordion({
  props,
  handleDrawerClose,
})

...

<Link
                    to={menuItem.url}
                    component={RouterLink}
                    color="inherit"
                    underline="hover"
                    onClick={() => handleDrawerClose()}
                  >
                    {menuItem.label}
                  </Link>

S
Salma Gomaa

You can do it by passing a reference for the parent to child, as:

Having a parent component A in A.js with a method updateAState Having a child component B in B.js Having a wrapper function that renders in C.js In C.js you can use useRef as following:

import React, { useRef } from "react"; export default function C() { const parentARef = useRef(); const handleChildBClick = () => parentARef.current.updateAState(); return ( ); }

Guidance Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/56496607/1770571


A
Anmol Shrivastav

Parent Component

 function Parent() {
        const [value, setValue] = React.useState("");

        function handleChange(newValue) {
          setValue(newValue);
        }

        // We pass a callback to Child
        return <Child value={value} onChange={handleChange} />;
    }

Child Component

    function Child(props) {
         function handleChange(event) {
             // Here, we invoke the callback with the new value
             props.onChange(event.target.value);
         }
  
         return <input value={props.value} onChange={handleChange} />
    }

s
suresh
<Footer 
  action={()=>this.setState({showChart: true})}
/>

<footer className="row">
    <button type="button" onClick={this.props.action}>Edit</button>
  {console.log(this.props)}
</footer>

Try this example to write inline setState, it avoids creating another function.

It cause performance issue: stackoverflow.com/q/36677733/3328979