Can anybody give a clear explanation of how variable assignment really works in Makefiles.
What is the difference between :
VARIABLE = value
VARIABLE ?= value
VARIABLE := value
VARIABLE += value
I have read the section in GNU Make's manual, but it still doesn't make sense to me.
Lazy Set
VARIABLE = value
Normal setting of a variable, but any other variables mentioned with the value
field are recursively expanded with their value at the point at which the variable is used, not the one it had when it was declared
Immediate Set
VARIABLE := value
Setting of a variable with simple expansion of the values inside - values within it are expanded at declaration time.
Lazy Set If Absent
VARIABLE ?= value
Setting of a variable only if it doesn't have a value. value
is always evaluated when VARIABLE
is accessed. It is equivalent to
ifeq ($(origin VARIABLE), undefined)
VARIABLE = value
endif
See the documentation for more details.
Append
VARIABLE += value
Appending the supplied value to the existing value (or setting to that value if the variable didn't exist)
Using =
causes the variable to be assigned a value. If the variable already had a value, it is replaced. This value will be expanded when it is used. For example:
HELLO = world
HELLO_WORLD = $(HELLO) world!
# This echoes "world world!"
echo $(HELLO_WORLD)
HELLO = hello
# This echoes "hello world!"
echo $(HELLO_WORLD)
Using :=
is similar to using =
. However, instead of the value being expanded when it is used, it is expanded during the assignment. For example:
HELLO = world
HELLO_WORLD := $(HELLO) world!
# This echoes "world world!"
echo $(HELLO_WORLD)
HELLO = hello
# Still echoes "world world!"
echo $(HELLO_WORLD)
HELLO_WORLD := $(HELLO) world!
# This echoes "hello world!"
echo $(HELLO_WORLD)
Using ?=
assigns the variable a value iff the variable was not previously assigned. If the variable was previously assigned a blank value (VAR=
), it is still considered set I think. Otherwise, functions exactly like =
.
Using +=
is like using =
, but instead of replacing the value, the value is appended to the current one, with a space in between. If the variable was previously set with :=
, it is expanded I think. The resulting value is expanded when it is used I think. For example:
HELLO_WORLD = hello
HELLO_WORLD += world!
# This echoes "hello world!"
echo $(HELLO_WORLD)
If something like HELLO_WORLD = $(HELLO_WORLD) world!
were used, recursion would result, which would most likely end the execution of your Makefile. If A := $(A) $(B)
were used, the result would not be the exact same as using +=
because B
is expanded with :=
whereas +=
would not cause B
to be expanded.
VARIABLE = literal
and VARIABLE := literal
are always equivalent. Did I get that right?
I suggest you do some experiments using "make". Here is a simple demo, showing the difference between =
and :=
.
/* Filename: Makefile*/
x := foo
y := $(x) bar
x := later
a = foo
b = $(a) bar
a = later
test:
@echo x - $(x)
@echo y - $(y)
@echo a - $(a)
@echo b - $(b)
make test
prints:
x - later
y - foo bar
a - later
b - later bar
Check more elaborate explanation here
@
in front each recipe to avoid this confusing repetition of results.
/* ... */
block comment
When you use VARIABLE = value
, if value
is actually a reference to another variable, then the value is only determined when VARIABLE
is used. This is best illustrated with an example:
VAL = foo
VARIABLE = $(VAL)
VAL = bar
# VARIABLE and VAL will both evaluate to "bar"
When you use VARIABLE := value
, you get the value of value
as it is now. For example:
VAL = foo
VARIABLE := $(VAL)
VAL = bar
# VAL will evaluate to "bar", but VARIABLE will evaluate to "foo"
Using VARIABLE ?= val
means that you only set the value of VARIABLE
if VARIABLE
is not set already. If it's not set already, the setting of the value is deferred until VARIABLE
is used (as in example 1).
VARIABLE += value
just appends value
to VARIABLE
. The actual value of value
is determined as it was when it was initially set, using either =
or :=
.
In the above answers, it is important to understand what is meant by "values are expanded at declaration/use time". Giving a value like *.c
does not entail any expansion. It is only when this string is used by a command that it will maybe trigger some globbing. Similarly, a value like $(wildcard *.c)
or $(shell ls *.c)
does not entail any expansion and is completely evaluated at definition time even if we used :=
in the variable definition.
Try the following Makefile in directory where you have some C files:
VAR1 = *.c
VAR2 := *.c
VAR3 = $(wildcard *.c)
VAR4 := $(wildcard *.c)
VAR5 = $(shell ls *.c)
VAR6 := $(shell ls *.c)
all :
touch foo.c
@echo "now VAR1 = \"$(VAR1)\"" ; ls $(VAR1)
@echo "now VAR2 = \"$(VAR2)\"" ; ls $(VAR2)
@echo "now VAR3 = \"$(VAR3)\"" ; ls $(VAR3)
@echo "now VAR4 = \"$(VAR4)\"" ; ls $(VAR4)
@echo "now VAR5 = \"$(VAR5)\"" ; ls $(VAR5)
@echo "now VAR6 = \"$(VAR6)\"" ; ls $(VAR6)
rm -v foo.c
Running make
will trigger a rule that creates an extra (empty) C file, called foo.c
but none of the 6 variables has foo.c
in its value.
The most upvoted answer can be improved.
Let me refer to GNU Make manual "Setting variables" and "Flavors", and add some comments.
Recursively expanded variables
The value you specify is installed verbatim; if it contains references to other variables, these references are expanded whenever this variable is substituted (in the course of expanding some other string). When this happens, it is called recursive expansion.
foo = $(bar)
The catch: foo
will be expanded to the value of $(bar)
each time foo
is evaluated, possibly resulting in different values. Surely you cannot call it "lazy"! This can surprise you if executed on midnight:
# This variable is haunted!
WHEN = $(shell date -I)
something:
touch $(WHEN).flag
# If this is executed on 00:00:00:000, $(WHEN) will have a different value!
something-else-later: something
test -f $(WHEN).flag || echo "Boo!"
Simply expanded variable
VARIABLE := value
VARIABLE ::= value
Variables defined with ‘:=’ or ‘::=’ are simply expanded variables.
Simply expanded variables are defined by lines using ‘:=’ or ‘::=’ [...]. Both forms are equivalent in GNU make; however only the ‘::=’ form is described by the POSIX standard [...] 2012.
The value of a simply expanded variable is scanned once and for all, expanding any references to other variables and functions, when the variable is defined.
Not much to add. It's evaluated immediately, including recursive expansion of, well, recursively expanded variables.
The catch: If VARIABLE
refers to ANOTHER_VARIABLE
:
VARIABLE := $(ANOTHER_VARIABLE)-yohoho
and ANOTHER_VARIABLE
is not defined before this assignment, ANOTHER_VARIABLE
will expand to an empty value.
Assign if not set
FOO ?= bar
is equivalent to
ifeq ($(origin FOO), undefined)
FOO = bar
endif
where $(origin FOO)
equals to undefined
only if the variable was not set at all.
The catch: if FOO
was set to an empty string, either in makefiles, shell environment, or command line overrides, it will not be assigned bar
.
Appending
VAR += bar
When the variable in question has not been defined before, ‘+=’ acts just like normal ‘=’: it defines a recursively-expanded variable. However, when there is a previous definition, exactly what ‘+=’ does depends on what flavor of variable you defined originally.
So, this will print foo bar
:
VAR = foo
# ... a mile of code
VAR += $(BAR)
BAR = bar
$(info $(VAR))
but this will print foo
:
VAR := foo
# ... a mile of code
VAR += $(BAR)
BAR = bar
$(info $(VAR))
The catch is that +=
behaves differently depending on what type of variable VAR
was assigned before.
Multiline values
The syntax to assign multiline value to a variable is:
define VAR_NAME :=
line
line
endef
or
define VAR_NAME =
line
line
endef
Assignment operator can be omitted, then it creates a recursively-expanded variable.
define VAR_NAME
line
line
endef
The last newline before endef
is removed.
Bonus: the shell assignment operator ‘!=’
HASH != printf '\043'
is the same as
HASH := $(shell printf '\043')
Don't use it. $(shell)
call is more readable, and the usage of both in a makefiles is highly discouraged. At least, $(shell)
follows Joel's advice and makes wrong code look obviously wrong.
?=
and =
equivalent when defining macros that are intended to be overridden by environment variables, like CFLAGS
/CPPFLAGS
/LDFLAGS
?
=
overrides any existing value. Also note that command-line override variables (that go after make
on command line) override every single assignment in Makefile
, except for overrides.
=
and :=
override environment variables, environment variables override =?
, command-line "override variables" override both, and the override
directive overrides all of the above. This interaction with environment variables and command-line override might be a very helpful clarification in your already-very-thorough answer.
Success story sharing