ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Case class to map in Scala

Is there a nice way I can convert a Scala case class instance, e.g.

case class MyClass(param1: String, param2: String)
val x = MyClass("hello", "world")

into a mapping of some kind, e.g.

getCCParams(x) returns "param1" -> "hello", "param2" -> "world"

Which works for any case class, not just predefined ones. I've found you can pull the case class name out by writing a method that interrogates the underlying Product class, e.g.

def getCCName(caseobj: Product) = caseobj.productPrefix 
getCCName(x) returns "MyClass"

So I'm looking for a similar solution but for the case class fields. I'd imagine a solution might have to use Java reflection, but I'd hate to write something that might break in a future release of Scala if the underlying implementation of case classes changes.

Currently I'm working on a Scala server and defining the protocol and all its messages and exceptions using case classes, as they are such a beautiful, concise construct for this. But I then need to translate them into a Java map to send over the messaging layer for any client implementation to use. My current implementation just defines a translation for each case class separately, but it would be nice to find a generalised solution.

I found this blog post that shows how to use macros to do this.

J
Joan

This should work:

def getCCParams(cc: AnyRef) =
  cc.getClass.getDeclaredFields.foldLeft(Map.empty[String, Any]) { (a, f) =>
    f.setAccessible(true)
    a + (f.getName -> f.get(cc))
  }

If this is not difficult can you explain what you wrote?
Now there is scala reflection! I'm not sure if it is still experimental or if it is stable, now. Anyway maybe scala reflection API delivers an own solution or at least a more scala way to implement a solution like the one above. And by the way: when you use setAccessible to true you can access private fields, too. Is this really what you want? And it may not work when a SecurityManager is active.
@RobinGreen case classes can't inherit from each other
@GiovanniBotta The problem seems to be that the accessor method isn't marked as accessible. Weird, as it's a public method. In any case, it should be fine to take out the isAccessible, as getMethod only returns public methods. Also, accessor != null is the wrong test, as getMethod throws a NoSuchMethodException if the method isn't found.
probably in this way is easier to understand: case class Person(name: String, surname: String) val person = new Person("Daniele", "DalleMule") val personAsMap = person.getClass.getDeclaredFields.foldLeft(Map[String, Any]())((map, field) => { field.setAccessible(true) map + (field.getName -> field.get(person)) } )
A
Andrejs

Because case classes extend Product one can simply use .productIterator to get field values:

def getCCParams(cc: Product) = cc.getClass.getDeclaredFields.map( _.getName ) // all field names
                .zip( cc.productIterator.to ).toMap // zipped with all values

Or alternatively:

def getCCParams(cc: Product) = {          
      val values = cc.productIterator
      cc.getClass.getDeclaredFields.map( _.getName -> values.next ).toMap
}

One advantage of Product is that you don't need to call setAccessible on the field to read its value. Another is that productIterator doesn't use reflection.

Note that this example works with simple case classes that don't extend other classes and don't declare fields outside the constructor.


The getDeclaredFields specification says: "The elements in the array returned are not sorted and are not in any particular order." How come the fields return in the correct order?
True, it's best to check on your jvm/os but in practice stackoverflow.com/a/5004929/1180621
Yeah I wouldn't take that for granted though. I don't want to start writing non portable code.
This will throw an exception if the case class is nested in another object because the productIterator will not contain the "$outer" declared field.
X
Xavier Guihot

Starting Scala 2.13, case classes (as implementations of Product) are provided with a productElementNames method which returns an iterator over their field's names.

By zipping field names with field values obtained with productIterator we can generically obtain the associated Map:

// case class MyClass(param1: String, param2: String)
// val x = MyClass("hello", "world")
(x.productElementNames zip x.productIterator).toMap
// Map[String,Any] = Map("param1" -> "hello", "param2" -> "world")

That's what I was looking for. Nice and clean solution to my problem.
P
Piotr Krzemiński

If anybody looks for a recursive version, here is the modification of @Andrejs's solution:

def getCCParams(cc: Product): Map[String, Any] = {
  val values = cc.productIterator
  cc.getClass.getDeclaredFields.map {
    _.getName -> (values.next() match {
      case p: Product if p.productArity > 0 => getCCParams(p)
      case x => x
    })
  }.toMap
}

It also expands the nested case-classes into maps at any level of nesting.


S
ShawnFumo

Here's a simple variation if you don't care about making it a generic function:

case class Person(name:String, age:Int)

def personToMap(person: Person): Map[String, Any] = {
  val fieldNames = person.getClass.getDeclaredFields.map(_.getName)
  val vals = Person.unapply(person).get.productIterator.toSeq
  fieldNames.zip(vals).toMap
}

scala> println(personToMap(Person("Tom", 50)))
res02: scala.collection.immutable.Map[String,Any] = Map(name -> Tom, age -> 50)

B
Barak BN

If you happen to be using Json4s, you could do the following:

import org.json4s.{Extraction, _}

case class MyClass(param1: String, param2: String)
val x = MyClass("hello", "world")

Extraction.decompose(x)(DefaultFormats).values.asInstanceOf[Map[String,String]]

S
Stefan Endrullis

Solution with ProductCompletion from interpreter package:

import tools.nsc.interpreter.ProductCompletion

def getCCParams(cc: Product) = {
  val pc = new ProductCompletion(cc)
  pc.caseNames.zip(pc.caseFields).toMap
}

Did tools.nsc.interpreter.ProductCompletion get moved somewhere else in Scala 2.10?
C
Community

You could use shapeless.

Let

case class X(a: Boolean, b: String,c:Int)
case class Y(a: String, b: String)

Define a LabelledGeneric representation

import shapeless._
import shapeless.ops.product._
import shapeless.syntax.std.product._
object X {
  implicit val lgenX = LabelledGeneric[X]
}
object Y {
  implicit val lgenY = LabelledGeneric[Y]
}

Define two typeclasses to provide the toMap methods

object ToMapImplicits {

  implicit class ToMapOps[A <: Product](val a: A)
    extends AnyVal {
    def mkMapAny(implicit toMap: ToMap.Aux[A, Symbol, Any]): Map[String, Any] =
      a.toMap[Symbol, Any]
        .map { case (k: Symbol, v) => k.name -> v }
  }

  implicit class ToMapOps2[A <: Product](val a: A)
    extends AnyVal {
    def mkMapString(implicit toMap: ToMap.Aux[A, Symbol, Any]): Map[String, String] =
      a.toMap[Symbol, Any]
        .map { case (k: Symbol, v) => k.name -> v.toString }
  }
}

Then you can use it like this.

object Run  extends App {
  import ToMapImplicits._
  val x: X = X(true, "bike",26)
  val y: Y = Y("first", "second")
  val anyMapX: Map[String, Any] = x.mkMapAny
  val anyMapY: Map[String, Any] = y.mkMapAny
  println("anyMapX = " + anyMapX)
  println("anyMapY = " + anyMapY)

  val stringMapX: Map[String, String] = x.mkMapString
  val stringMapY: Map[String, String] = y.mkMapString
  println("anyMapX = " + anyMapX)
  println("anyMapY = " + anyMapY)
}

which prints

anyMapX = Map(c -> 26, b -> bike, a -> true) anyMapY = Map(b -> second, a -> first) stringMapX = Map(c -> 26, b -> bike, a -> true) stringMapY = Map(b -> second, a -> first)

For nested case classes, (thus nested maps) check another answer


A
André Laszlo

I don't know about nice... but this seems to work, at least for this very very basic example. It probably needs some work but might be enough to get you started? Basically it filters out all "known" methods from a case class (or any other class :/ )

object CaseMappingTest {
  case class MyCase(a: String, b: Int)

  def caseClassToMap(obj: AnyRef) = {
    val c = obj.getClass
    val predefined = List("$tag", "productArity", "productPrefix", "hashCode",
                          "toString")
    val casemethods = c.getMethods.toList.filter{
      n =>
        (n.getParameterTypes.size == 0) &&
        (n.getDeclaringClass == c) &&
        (! predefined.exists(_ == n.getName))

    }
    val values = casemethods.map(_.invoke(obj, null))
    casemethods.map(_.getName).zip(values).foldLeft(Map[String, Any]())(_+_)
  }

  def main(args: Array[String]) {
    println(caseClassToMap(MyCase("foo", 1)))
    // prints: Map(a -> foo, b -> 1)
  }
}

Oops. I missed Class.getDeclaredFields.
K
Kai Han
commons.mapper.Mappers.Mappers.beanToMap(caseClassBean)

Details: https://github.com/hank-whu/common4s


A
Artavazd Balayan

With the use of Java reflection, but no change of access level. Converts Product and case class to Map[String, String]:

def productToMap[T <: Product](obj: T, prefix: String): Map[String, String] = {
  val clazz = obj.getClass
  val fields = clazz.getDeclaredFields.map(_.getName).toSet
  val methods = clazz.getDeclaredMethods.filter(method => fields.contains(method.getName))
  methods.foldLeft(Map[String, String]()) { case (acc, method) =>
    val value = method.invoke(obj).toString
    val key = if (prefix.isEmpty) method.getName else s"${prefix}_${method.getName}"
    acc + (key -> value)
  }
}

关注公众号,不定期副业成功案例分享
Follow WeChat

Success story sharing

Want to stay one step ahead of the latest teleworks?

Subscribe Now