ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

How to check if type of a variable is string?

Is there a way to check if the type of a variable in python is a string, like:

isinstance(x,int);

for integer values?

Required reading on isinstance if you are learning python canonical.org/~kragen/isinstance .
Be careful with ints since isinstance(True, int) is True.
isinstance(x,str) is correct in Python 3 (str is a basic type).
How about simply: type(my_variable) is str? I made this an answer.

S
Sven Marnach

In Python 2.x, you would do

isinstance(s, basestring)

basestring is the abstract superclass of str and unicode. It can be used to test whether an object is an instance of str or unicode.

In Python 3.x, the correct test is

isinstance(s, str)

The bytes class isn't considered a string type in Python 3.


@Yarin: No. But it doesn't matter, because Python 3.x is not meant to be compatible with Python 2.x at all.
I found that isinstance(s, str) works with py27, tested on : Python 2.7.5 (default, Aug 25 2013, 00:04:04) [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 5.0 (clang-500.0.68)] on darwin.
@kakyo: The problem is that it will miss unicode objects, which should also be considered strings. Both the type str and the type unicode have the common base class basestring, and this is what you want to check for.
@Yarin if you're porting something from 2.x to 3.x, you can always assign basestring = str.
@AdamErickson For compatibility with what exactly? It doesn't help for compatibility with Python 3, since there is no unicode in Python 3. My recommendation for compatibility between Python 2 and 3 is to use the "six" library. (Specifically isintance(s, six.string_types) in this case)
A
André Fratelli

I know this is an old topic, but being the first one shown on google and given that I don't find any of the answers satisfactory, I'll leave this here for future reference:

six is a Python 2 and 3 compatibility library which already covers this issue. You can then do something like this:

import six

if isinstance(value, six.string_types):
    pass # It's a string !!

Inspecting the code, this is what you find:

import sys

PY3 = sys.version_info[0] == 3

if PY3:
    string_types = str,
else:
    string_types = basestring,

E.g. for a one liner: value_is_string = isinstance(value, str if sys.version_info[0] >= 3 else basestring), where >= assumes any eventual Python 4+ keeps the str root class for strings.
six is not a part of the standard Python install, so almost by definition is non-portable. I want to write a simple Python app and have it "just work" for anybody who runs it. If I tell them "first, you need to install this other library just use my app", that's a big problem.
That's why the implementation code is there.
The six library seems to be available only for Python2 on my Mac. If its availability is version-specific, you might as well use one of the version-specific solutions in the first place.
What the code expands into is written there. You can just use that. The point is that other answers here are wrong, according to what the Python library considers a string type.
T
Texom512

In Python 3.x or Python 2.7.6

if type(x) == str:

I like the elegance of "if type(x) in (str, unicode):", but I see PyLint flags it as "unidiomatic".
Comparing types with == is explicitly discouraged by PEP8, and has several downsides in addition to be considered "unidiomatic", e.g. it does not detect instances of subclasses of str, which should be considered strings as well. If you really want to check for exactly the type str and explicitly exclude subclasses, use type(x) is str.
@SvenMarnach So should isinstance be used instead to include the subclasses?
@sinekonata Yes, the most common and recommended way to check for strings is isinstance(s, str) in Python 3.x – see my answer above. Only if you have a specific reason to exclude subclasses (which should be rare), you should use type(s) is str.
type(x) == str doesn't work for unicode strings in Python2. type(x) in (str, unicode) is an error in Python3.
i
ivanleoncz

you can do:

var = 1
if type(var) == int:
   print('your variable is an integer')

or:

var2 = 'this is variable #2'
if type(var2) == str:
    print('your variable is a string')
else:
    print('your variable IS NOT a string')

hope this helps!


Better to use something as type(var) is int, as using == to compare types is not recommended by PEP8
G
Gabriel Staples

Use type() or isinstance()

I don't know why not a single answer before me contains this simple type(my_variable) is str syntax, but using type() like this seems the most-logical and simple to me, by far:

(tested in Python3):

# Option 1: check to see if `my_variable` is of type `str`
type(my_variable) is str

# Option 2: check to see if `my_variable` is of type `str`, including
# being a subclass of type `str` (ie: also see if `my_variable` is any object 
# which inherits from `str` as a parent class)
isinstance(my_variable, str)

The Python type() built-in function documentation is here: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#type. It states, in part, the following. Notice the note about isinstance():

class type(object) class type(name, bases, dict, **kwds) With one argument, return the type of an object. The return value is a type object and generally the same object as returned by object.__class__. The isinstance() built-in function is recommended for testing the type of an object, because it takes subclasses into account.

So, if you're checking the type of a class object instead of a simple variable, and you need to take subclasses into account, then use isinstance() instead. See its documentation here: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#isinstance.

Example code:

my_str = "hello"
my_int = 7

print(type(my_str) is str)
print(type(my_int) is str)

print()
print(isinstance(my_str, str))
print(isinstance(my_int, str))

Output:

True False True False


d
dicato

The type module also exists if you are checking more than ints and strings. http://docs.python.org/library/types.html


More specifically, types.StringTypes.
types.StringTypes appears to no longer exist in Python 3 :(
types.StringTypes is not defined for Python3
W
Wade Hatler

Edit based on better answer below. Go down about 3 answers and find out about the coolness of basestring.

Old answer: Watch out for unicode strings, which you can get from several places, including all COM calls in Windows.

if isinstance(target, str) or isinstance(target, unicode):

Good catch. I didn't know about basestring. It's mentioned about 3 posts down and seems like a better answer.
isinstance() also takes a tuple as the second argument. So even if basestring did not exist, you could just use isinstance(target, (str, unicode)).
In python 3.5.1, unicode does not appear to be defined: NameError: name 'unicode' is not defined
u
umläute

since basestring isn't defined in Python3, this little trick might help to make the code compatible:

try: # check whether python knows about 'basestring'
   basestring
except NameError: # no, it doesn't (it's Python3); use 'str' instead
   basestring=str

after that you can run the following test on both Python2 and Python3

isinstance(myvar, basestring)

Or if you want to catch byte strings too: basestring = (str, bytes)
c
crizCraig

Python 2 / 3 including unicode

from __future__ import unicode_literals
from builtins import str  #  pip install future
isinstance('asdf', str)   #  True
isinstance(u'asdf', str)  #  True

http://python-future.org/overview.html


Thanks a lot! There are dozens of various answers around the internet but the only good is this one. The first line makes type('foo') being unicode by default in python 2, and the second one make str being instance of unicode. Thoses makes the code valid in Python 2 and 3. Thanks again !
P
PatNowak

So,

You have plenty of options to check whether your variable is string or not:

a = "my string"
type(a) == str # first 
a.__class__ == str # second
isinstance(a, str) # third
str(a) == a # forth
type(a) == type('') # fifth

This order is for purpose.


This is a good compendium of ways to test a type. However in Python2, if you consider unicode to be a string type, this won't work.
d
duanev

Lots of good suggestions provided by others here, but I don't see a good cross-platform summary. The following should be a good drop in for any Python program:

def isstring(s):
    # if we use Python 3
    if (sys.version_info[0] >= 3):
        return isinstance(s, str)
    # we use Python 2
    return isinstance(s, basestring)

In this function, we use isinstance(object, classinfo) to see if our input is a str in Python 3 or a basestring in Python 2.


This will likely break in Python 4, consider >= at least.
be cleaner to check for six.string_types or six.text_type
@daonb importing an entire module just to do a one-line test is the thinking that causes crazy dependency trees and serious bloat to ruin what should be something short small and simple. It's your call of course, but just say'n ...
@duanev if you're worried about Python 2/3 compatibility it's a better idea to be using six in the project anyways. Six is also a single file so dependency trees / bloat are not an issue here.
Also, at least on my Mac, import six is an error in Python3
D
Daniil Grankin

Also I want notice that if you want to check whether the type of a variable is a specific kind, you can compare the type of the variable to the type of a known object.

For string you can use this

type(s) == type('')

This is a terrible, terrible way to type check in python. What if another class inherits from str? What about unicode strings, which don't even inherit from str in 2.x? Use isinstance(s, basestring) in 2.x, or isinstance(s, str) in 3.x.
@Jack, please read question, and also notice I do not write that it's the best way, just another way.
This is a bad idea for 3 reasons: isinstance() allows for subclasses (which are strings too, just specialised), the extra type('') call is redundant when you can just use str and types are singletons, so type(s) is str is going to be a more efficient test.
y
yprez

Alternative way for Python 2, without using basestring:

isinstance(s, (str, unicode))

But still won't work in Python 3 since unicode isn't defined (in Python 3).


C
Cas

Here is my answer to support both Python 2 and Python 3 along with these requirements:

Written in Py3 code with minimal Py2 compat code.

Remove Py2 compat code later without disruption. I.e. aim for deletion only, no modification to Py3 code.

Avoid using six or similar compat module as they tend to hide away what is trying to be achieved.

Future-proof for a potential Py4.

import sys
PY2 = sys.version_info.major == 2

# Check if string (lenient for byte-strings on Py2):
isinstance('abc', basestring if PY2 else str)

# Check if strictly a string (unicode-string):
isinstance('abc', unicode if PY2 else str)

# Check if either string (unicode-string) or byte-string:
isinstance('abc', basestring if PY2 else (str, bytes))

# Check for byte-string (Py3 and Py2.7):
isinstance('abc', bytes)

b
be_good_do_good
a = '1000' # also tested for 'abc100', 'a100bc', '100abc'

isinstance(a, str) or isinstance(a, unicode)

returns True

type(a) in [str, unicode]

returns True


For Python 2.7.12 I had to remove the quotes: type(a) in [str, unicode]
Won't work for Python3
m
mPrinC

If you do not want to depend on external libs, this works both for Python 2.7+ and Python 3 (http://ideone.com/uB4Kdc):

# your code goes here
s = ["test"];
#s = "test";
isString = False;

if(isinstance(s, str)):
    isString = True;
try:
    if(isinstance(s, basestring)):
        isString = True;
except NameError:
    pass;

if(isString):
    print("String");
else:
    print("Not String");

H
Hassan Mehmood

You can simply use the isinstance function to make sure that the input data is of format string or unicode. Below examples will help you to understand easily.

>>> isinstance('my string', str)
True
>>> isinstance(12, str)
False
>>> isinstance('my string', unicode)
False
>>> isinstance(u'my string',  unicode)
True

E
Edward Falk

Summarizing:

There doesn't seem to be a portable way to do it if you want both Python2 and Python3, and want to include unicode as well. I wound up using this idiom:

# Near the top of my program
if sys.version_info[0] >= 3:
    basestring = str

Then any time I want to test an object to see if it's a string:

if isinstance(obj, basestring):
    ...

Frankly, I'm a little shocked that Python3 dropped basestring as well as types.StringTypes. I see no reason to drop them, and keeping either of them would have made this problem solveable.


v
vadim vaduxa
s = '123'
issubclass(s.__class__, str)

U
User

This is how I do it:

if type(x) == type(str()):

type(str()) is a very roundabout way of saying str. Types are singletons, so type(x) is str is more efficient. isinstance() should be used instead, unless you have very good reasons to ignore subclasses of str.
if type(x) is str:
f
fast tooth

I've seen:

hasattr(s, 'endswith') 

R
Richard Urban
>>> thing = 'foo'
>>> type(thing).__name__ == 'str' or type(thing).__name__ == 'unicode'
True

In which case would you prefer type(thing).__name__ == 'str' over type(thing) == str or isinstance(thing, str)? Also unicode does not exist in modern versions of Python.