Is there a way to check if the type of a variable in python is a string
, like:
isinstance(x,int);
for integer values?
isinstance(True, int) is True
.
isinstance(x,str)
is correct in Python 3 (str is a basic type).
type(my_variable) is str
? I made this an answer.
In Python 2.x, you would do
isinstance(s, basestring)
basestring
is the abstract superclass of str
and unicode
. It can be used to test whether an object is an instance of str
or unicode
.
In Python 3.x, the correct test is
isinstance(s, str)
The bytes
class isn't considered a string type in Python 3.
I know this is an old topic, but being the first one shown on google and given that I don't find any of the answers satisfactory, I'll leave this here for future reference:
six is a Python 2 and 3 compatibility library which already covers this issue. You can then do something like this:
import six
if isinstance(value, six.string_types):
pass # It's a string !!
Inspecting the code, this is what you find:
import sys
PY3 = sys.version_info[0] == 3
if PY3:
string_types = str,
else:
string_types = basestring,
value_is_string = isinstance(value, str if sys.version_info[0] >= 3 else basestring)
, where >=
assumes any eventual Python 4+ keeps the str
root class for strings.
six
library seems to be available only for Python2 on my Mac. If its availability is version-specific, you might as well use one of the version-specific solutions in the first place.
In Python 3.x or Python 2.7.6
if type(x) == str:
==
is explicitly discouraged by PEP8, and has several downsides in addition to be considered "unidiomatic", e.g. it does not detect instances of subclasses of str
, which should be considered strings as well. If you really want to check for exactly the type str
and explicitly exclude subclasses, use type(x) is str
.
isinstance(s, str)
in Python 3.x – see my answer above. Only if you have a specific reason to exclude subclasses (which should be rare), you should use type(s) is str
.
type(x) == str
doesn't work for unicode strings in Python2. type(x) in (str, unicode)
is an error in Python3.
you can do:
var = 1
if type(var) == int:
print('your variable is an integer')
or:
var2 = 'this is variable #2'
if type(var2) == str:
print('your variable is a string')
else:
print('your variable IS NOT a string')
hope this helps!
type(var) is int
, as using ==
to compare types is not recommended by PEP8
Use type() or isinstance()
I don't know why not a single answer before me contains this simple type(my_variable) is str
syntax, but using type()
like this seems the most-logical and simple to me, by far:
(tested in Python3):
# Option 1: check to see if `my_variable` is of type `str`
type(my_variable) is str
# Option 2: check to see if `my_variable` is of type `str`, including
# being a subclass of type `str` (ie: also see if `my_variable` is any object
# which inherits from `str` as a parent class)
isinstance(my_variable, str)
The Python type()
built-in function documentation is here: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#type. It states, in part, the following. Notice the note about isinstance()
:
class type(object) class type(name, bases, dict, **kwds) With one argument, return the type of an object. The return value is a type object and generally the same object as returned by object.__class__. The isinstance() built-in function is recommended for testing the type of an object, because it takes subclasses into account.
So, if you're checking the type of a class object instead of a simple variable, and you need to take subclasses into account, then use isinstance()
instead. See its documentation here: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#isinstance.
Example code:
my_str = "hello"
my_int = 7
print(type(my_str) is str)
print(type(my_int) is str)
print()
print(isinstance(my_str, str))
print(isinstance(my_int, str))
Output:
True False True False
The type module also exists if you are checking more than ints and strings. http://docs.python.org/library/types.html
types.StringTypes
.
types.StringTypes
is not defined for Python3
Edit based on better answer below. Go down about 3 answers and find out about the coolness of basestring.
Old answer: Watch out for unicode strings, which you can get from several places, including all COM calls in Windows.
if isinstance(target, str) or isinstance(target, unicode):
isinstance()
also takes a tuple as the second argument. So even if basestring
did not exist, you could just use isinstance(target, (str, unicode))
.
unicode
does not appear to be defined: NameError: name 'unicode' is not defined
since basestring
isn't defined in Python3, this little trick might help to make the code compatible:
try: # check whether python knows about 'basestring'
basestring
except NameError: # no, it doesn't (it's Python3); use 'str' instead
basestring=str
after that you can run the following test on both Python2 and Python3
isinstance(myvar, basestring)
basestring = (str, bytes)
Python 2 / 3 including unicode
from __future__ import unicode_literals
from builtins import str # pip install future
isinstance('asdf', str) # True
isinstance(u'asdf', str) # True
http://python-future.org/overview.html
type('foo')
being unicode
by default in python 2, and the second one make str
being instance of unicode
. Thoses makes the code valid in Python 2 and 3. Thanks again !
So,
You have plenty of options to check whether your variable is string or not:
a = "my string"
type(a) == str # first
a.__class__ == str # second
isinstance(a, str) # third
str(a) == a # forth
type(a) == type('') # fifth
This order is for purpose.
Lots of good suggestions provided by others here, but I don't see a good cross-platform summary. The following should be a good drop in for any Python program:
def isstring(s):
# if we use Python 3
if (sys.version_info[0] >= 3):
return isinstance(s, str)
# we use Python 2
return isinstance(s, basestring)
In this function, we use isinstance(object, classinfo)
to see if our input is a str
in Python 3 or a basestring
in Python 2.
>=
at least.
import six
is an error in Python3
Also I want notice that if you want to check whether the type of a variable is a specific kind, you can compare the type of the variable to the type of a known object.
For string you can use this
type(s) == type('')
str
? What about unicode strings, which don't even inherit from str
in 2.x? Use isinstance(s, basestring)
in 2.x, or isinstance(s, str)
in 3.x.
isinstance()
allows for subclasses (which are strings too, just specialised), the extra type('')
call is redundant when you can just use str
and types are singletons, so type(s) is str
is going to be a more efficient test.
Alternative way for Python 2, without using basestring:
isinstance(s, (str, unicode))
But still won't work in Python 3 since unicode
isn't defined (in Python 3).
Here is my answer to support both Python 2 and Python 3 along with these requirements:
Written in Py3 code with minimal Py2 compat code.
Remove Py2 compat code later without disruption. I.e. aim for deletion only, no modification to Py3 code.
Avoid using six or similar compat module as they tend to hide away what is trying to be achieved.
Future-proof for a potential Py4.
import sys
PY2 = sys.version_info.major == 2
# Check if string (lenient for byte-strings on Py2):
isinstance('abc', basestring if PY2 else str)
# Check if strictly a string (unicode-string):
isinstance('abc', unicode if PY2 else str)
# Check if either string (unicode-string) or byte-string:
isinstance('abc', basestring if PY2 else (str, bytes))
# Check for byte-string (Py3 and Py2.7):
isinstance('abc', bytes)
a = '1000' # also tested for 'abc100', 'a100bc', '100abc'
isinstance(a, str) or isinstance(a, unicode)
returns True
type(a) in [str, unicode]
returns True
If you do not want to depend on external libs, this works both for Python 2.7+ and Python 3 (http://ideone.com/uB4Kdc):
# your code goes here
s = ["test"];
#s = "test";
isString = False;
if(isinstance(s, str)):
isString = True;
try:
if(isinstance(s, basestring)):
isString = True;
except NameError:
pass;
if(isString):
print("String");
else:
print("Not String");
You can simply use the isinstance function to make sure that the input data is of format string or unicode. Below examples will help you to understand easily.
>>> isinstance('my string', str)
True
>>> isinstance(12, str)
False
>>> isinstance('my string', unicode)
False
>>> isinstance(u'my string', unicode)
True
Summarizing:
There doesn't seem to be a portable way to do it if you want both Python2 and Python3, and want to include unicode as well. I wound up using this idiom:
# Near the top of my program
if sys.version_info[0] >= 3:
basestring = str
Then any time I want to test an object to see if it's a string:
if isinstance(obj, basestring):
...
Frankly, I'm a little shocked that Python3 dropped basestring as well as types.StringTypes. I see no reason to drop them, and keeping either of them would have made this problem solveable.
s = '123'
issubclass(s.__class__, str)
This is how I do it:
if type(x) == type(str()):
type(str())
is a very roundabout way of saying str
. Types are singletons, so type(x) is str
is more efficient. isinstance()
should be used instead, unless you have very good reasons to ignore subclasses of str
.
I've seen:
hasattr(s, 'endswith')
>>> thing = 'foo'
>>> type(thing).__name__ == 'str' or type(thing).__name__ == 'unicode'
True
type(thing).__name__ == 'str'
over type(thing) == str
or isinstance(thing, str)
? Also unicode
does not exist in modern versions of Python.
Success story sharing
unicode
objects, which should also be considered strings. Both the typestr
and the typeunicode
have the common base classbasestring
, and this is what you want to check for.basestring = str
.unicode
in Python 3. My recommendation for compatibility between Python 2 and 3 is to use the "six" library. (Specificallyisintance(s, six.string_types)
in this case)