I have an async
method:
public async Task<string> GenerateCodeAsync()
{
string code = await GenerateCodeService.GenerateCodeAsync();
return code;
}
I need to call this method from a synchronous method.
How can I do this without having to duplicate the GenerateCodeAsync
method in order for this to work synchronously?
Update
Yet no reasonable solution found.
However, I see that HttpClient
already implements this pattern
using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient())
{
// async
HttpResponseMessage responseAsync = await client.GetAsync(url);
// sync
HttpResponseMessage responseSync = client.GetAsync(url).Result;
}
You can access the Result
property of the task, which will cause your thread to block until the result is available:
string code = GenerateCodeAsync().Result;
Note: In some cases, this might lead to a deadlock: Your call to Result
blocks the main thread, thereby preventing the remainder of the async code to execute. You have the following options to make sure that this doesn't happen:
Add .ConfigureAwait(false) to your library method or
explicitly execute your async method in a thread pool thread and wait for it to finish: string code = Task.Run(() => GenerateCodeAsync).Result;
This does not mean that you should just mindlessly add .ConfigureAwait(false)
after all your async calls! For a detailed analysis on why and when you should use .ConfigureAwait(false)
, see the following blog post:
.NET Blog: ConfigureAwait FAQ
You should get the awaiter (GetAwaiter()
) and end the wait for the completion of the asynchronous task (GetResult()
).
string code = GenerateCodeAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
Task.GetAwaiter
: This method is intended for compiler use rather than for use in application code.
You should be able to get this done using delegates, lambda expression
private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
label1.Text = "waiting....";
Task<string> sCode = Task.Run(async () =>
{
string msg =await GenerateCodeAsync();
return msg;
});
label1.Text += sCode.Result;
}
private Task<string> GenerateCodeAsync()
{
return Task.Run<string>(() => GenerateCode());
}
private string GenerateCode()
{
Thread.Sleep(2000);
return "I m back" ;
}
Task.Run
to wrap the call - thus moving it to the thread pool. However, based on other answer and comments, this does not ensure it will never deadlock - it might simply make the deadlock "rare" - thus even harder to track down what is going wrong.
I need to call this method from a synchronously method.
It's possible with GenerateCodeAsync().Result
or GenerateCodeAsync().Wait()
, as the other answer suggests. This would block the current thread until GenerateCodeAsync
has completed.
However, your question is tagged with asp.net, and you also left the comment:
I was hoping for a simpler solution, thinking that asp.net handled this much easier than writing so many lines of code
My point is, you should not be blocking on an asynchronous method in ASP.NET. This will reduce the scalability of your web app, and may create a deadlock (when an await
continuation inside GenerateCodeAsync
is posted to AspNetSynchronizationContext
). Using Task.Run(...).Result
to offload something to a pool thread and then block will hurt the scalability even more, as it incurs +1 more thread to process a given HTTP request.
ASP.NET has built-in support for asynchronous methods, either through asynchronous controllers (in ASP.NET MVC and Web API) or directly via AsyncManager
and PageAsyncTask
in classic ASP.NET. You should use it. For more details, check this answer.
SaveChanges()
method of DbContext
, and here i am calling the async methods, so unfortunately async controller won't help me in this situation
SaveChangesAsync
and SaveChanges
, just make sure they don't get called both in the same ASP.NET project.
.NET MVC
filters support asynchronous code, for example IAuthorizationFilter
, so i cannot use async
all the way
Microsoft Identity has extension methods which call async methods synchronously. For example there is GenerateUserIdentityAsync() method and equal CreateIdentity()
If you look at UserManagerExtensions.CreateIdentity() it look like this:
public static ClaimsIdentity CreateIdentity<TUser, TKey>(this UserManager<TUser, TKey> manager, TUser user,
string authenticationType)
where TKey : IEquatable<TKey>
where TUser : class, IUser<TKey>
{
if (manager == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("manager");
}
return AsyncHelper.RunSync(() => manager.CreateIdentityAsync(user, authenticationType));
}
Now lets see what AsyncHelper.RunSync does
public static TResult RunSync<TResult>(Func<Task<TResult>> func)
{
var cultureUi = CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture;
var culture = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture;
return _myTaskFactory.StartNew(() =>
{
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = culture;
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture = cultureUi;
return func();
}).Unwrap().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
So, this is your wrapper for async method. And please don't read data from Result - it will potentially block your code in ASP.
There is another way - which is suspicious for me, but you can consider it too
Result r = null;
YourAsyncMethod()
.ContinueWith(t =>
{
r = t.Result;
})
.Wait();
To prevent deadlocks I always try to use Task.Run()
when I have to call an async method synchronously that @Heinzi mentions.
However the method has to be modified if the async method uses parameters. For example Task.Run(GenerateCodeAsync("test")).Result
gives the error:
Argument 1: cannot convert from 'System.Threading.Tasks.Task
This could be called like this instead:
string code = Task.Run(() => GenerateCodeAsync("test")).Result;
Most of the answers on this thread are either complex or will result in deadlock.
Following method is simple and it will avoid deadlock because we are waiting for the task to finish and only then getting its result-
var task = Task.Run(() => GenerateCodeAsync());
task.Wait();
string code = task.Result;
Furthermore, here is a reference to MSDN article that talks about exactly same thing- https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jpsanders/2017/08/28/asp-net-do-not-use-task-result-in-main-context/
Task.Run
that makes this work (when running on ASP.NET context thread). Wait
is irrelevant - Result
does the equivalent when task has not completed. See this SO Q&A.
Task.Wait
tests IsWaitNotificationEnabledOrNotRanToCompletion
, then calls InternalWait
. Future.Result
tests IsWaitNotificationEnabledOrNotRanToCompletion
, then calls GetResultCore
, which does if (!IsCompleted) InternalWait
. I don't see any difference, w.r.t. deadlock potential. Of course its impossible to prove absence of deadlocks, and any change in code changes timing, so its entirely possible to have one approach fail randomly, and the other work .. until it doesn't.
Well I am using this approach, which will also handle and propagate exceptions from the underlying async task.
private string RunSync()
{
var task = Task.Run(async () => await GenerateCodeService.GenerateCodeAsync());
if (task.IsFaulted && task.Exception != null)
{
throw task.Exception;
}
return task.Result;
}
How about some extension methods that asynchronously await the completion of the asynchronous operation, then set a ManualResetEvent to indicate completion.
NOTE: You can use Task.Run(), however extension methods are a cleaner interface for expressing what you really want.
Tests showing how to use the extensions:
[TestClass]
public class TaskExtensionsTests
{
[TestMethod]
public void AsynchronousOperationWithNoResult()
{
SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResult().AwaitResult();
}
[TestMethod]
public void AsynchronousOperationWithResult()
{
Assert.AreEqual(3, SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResult(3).AwaitResult());
}
[TestMethod]
[ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
public void AsynchronousOperationWithNoResultThrows()
{
SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResultThrows().AwaitResult();
}
[TestMethod]
[ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
public void AsynchronousOperationWithResultThrows()
{
SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResultThrows(3).AwaitResult();
}
private static async Task SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResult()
{
await Task.Yield();
}
private static async Task<T> SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResult<T>(T result)
{
await Task.Yield();
return result;
}
private static async Task SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResultThrows()
{
await Task.Yield();
throw new Exception();
}
private static async Task<T> SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResultThrows<T>(T result)
{
await Task.Yield();
throw new Exception();
}
[TestMethod]
public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResult()
{
SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResult().AwaitResult();
}
[TestMethod]
public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithResult()
{
Assert.AreEqual(3, SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResult(3).AwaitResult());
}
[TestMethod]
[ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResultThrows()
{
SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResultThrows().AwaitResult();
}
[TestMethod]
[ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithResultThrows()
{
SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResultThrows(3).AwaitResult();
}
private static async ValueTask SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResult()
{
await Task.Yield();
}
private static async ValueTask<T> SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResult<T>(T result)
{
await Task.Yield();
return result;
}
private static async ValueTask SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResultThrows()
{
await Task.Yield();
throw new Exception();
}
private static async ValueTask<T> SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResultThrows<T>(T result)
{
await Task.Yield();
throw new Exception();
}
}
The extensions
/// <summary>
/// Defines extension methods for <see cref="Task"/> and <see cref="ValueTask"/>.
/// </summary>
public static class TaskExtensions
{
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking; ignoring cancellation.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
/// </param>
public static void AwaitCompletion(this ValueTask task)
{
new SynchronousAwaiter(task, true).GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking; ignoring cancellation.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
/// </param>
public static void AwaitCompletion(this Task task)
{
new SynchronousAwaiter(task, true).GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
/// </param>
/// <typeparam name="T">
/// The result type of the operation.
/// </typeparam>
/// <returns>
/// The result of the operation.
/// </returns>
public static T AwaitResult<T>(this Task<T> task)
{
return new SynchronousAwaiter<T>(task).GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
/// </param>
public static void AwaitResult(this Task task)
{
new SynchronousAwaiter(task).GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the pending operation.
/// </param>
/// <typeparam name="T">
/// The result type of the operation.
/// </typeparam>
/// <returns>
/// The result of the operation.
/// </returns>
public static T AwaitResult<T>(this ValueTask<T> task)
{
return new SynchronousAwaiter<T>(task).GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the pending operation.
/// </param>
public static void AwaitResult(this ValueTask task)
{
new SynchronousAwaiter(task).GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Ignore the <see cref="OperationCanceledException"/> if the operation is cancelled.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is to be ignored.
/// </param>
/// <returns>
/// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is ignored.
/// </returns>
public static async Task IgnoreCancellationResult(this Task task)
{
try
{
await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (OperationCanceledException)
{
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Ignore the <see cref="OperationCanceledException"/> if the operation is cancelled.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is to be ignored.
/// </param>
/// <returns>
/// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is ignored.
/// </returns>
public static async ValueTask IgnoreCancellationResult(this ValueTask task)
{
try
{
await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (OperationCanceledException)
{
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Ignore the results of an asynchronous operation allowing it to run and die silently in the background.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose results are to be ignored.
/// </param>
public static async void IgnoreResult(this Task task)
{
try
{
await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch
{
// ignore exceptions
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Ignore the results of an asynchronous operation allowing it to run and die silently in the background.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose results are to be ignored.
/// </param>
public static async void IgnoreResult(this ValueTask task)
{
try
{
await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch
{
// ignore exceptions
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Internal class for waiting for asynchronous operations that have a result.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="TResult">
/// The result type.
/// </typeparam>
public class SynchronousAwaiter<TResult>
{
/// <summary>
/// The manual reset event signaling completion.
/// </summary>
private readonly ManualResetEvent manualResetEvent;
/// <summary>
/// The exception thrown by the asynchronous operation.
/// </summary>
private Exception exception;
/// <summary>
/// The result of the asynchronous operation.
/// </summary>
private TResult result;
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
/// </param>
public SynchronousAwaiter(Task<TResult> task)
{
this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
this.WaitFor(task);
}
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
/// </param>
public SynchronousAwaiter(ValueTask<TResult> task)
{
this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
this.WaitFor(task);
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets a value indicating whether the operation is complete.
/// </summary>
public bool IsComplete => this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne(0);
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously get the result of an asynchronous operation.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>
/// The result of the asynchronous operation.
/// </returns>
public TResult GetResult()
{
this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne();
return this.exception != null ? throw this.exception : this.result;
}
/// <summary>
/// Tries to synchronously get the result of an asynchronous operation.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="operationResult">
/// The result of the operation.
/// </param>
/// <returns>
/// The result of the asynchronous operation.
/// </returns>
public bool TryGetResult(out TResult operationResult)
{
if (this.IsComplete)
{
operationResult = this.exception != null ? throw this.exception : this.result;
return true;
}
operationResult = default;
return false;
}
/// <summary>
/// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task.
/// </param>
private async void WaitFor(Task<TResult> task)
{
try
{
this.result = await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
this.exception = exception;
}
finally
{
this.manualResetEvent.Set();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task.
/// </param>
private async void WaitFor(ValueTask<TResult> task)
{
try
{
this.result = await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
this.exception = exception;
}
finally
{
this.manualResetEvent.Set();
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Internal class for waiting for asynchronous operations that have no result.
/// </summary>
public class SynchronousAwaiter
{
/// <summary>
/// The manual reset event signaling completion.
/// </summary>
private readonly ManualResetEvent manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
/// <summary>
/// The exception thrown by the asynchronous operation.
/// </summary>
private Exception exception;
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
/// </param>
/// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
/// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
/// </param>
public SynchronousAwaiter(Task task, bool ignoreCancellation = false)
{
this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
this.WaitFor(task, ignoreCancellation);
}
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
/// </param>
/// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
/// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
/// </param>
public SynchronousAwaiter(ValueTask task, bool ignoreCancellation = false)
{
this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
this.WaitFor(task, ignoreCancellation);
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets a value indicating whether the operation is complete.
/// </summary>
public bool IsComplete => this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne(0);
/// <summary>
/// Synchronously get the result of an asynchronous operation.
/// </summary>
public void GetResult()
{
this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne();
if (this.exception != null)
{
throw this.exception;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task.
/// </param>
/// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
/// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
/// </param>
private async void WaitFor(Task task, bool ignoreCancellation)
{
try
{
await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (OperationCanceledException)
{
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
this.exception = exception;
}
finally
{
this.manualResetEvent.Set();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="task">
/// The task.
/// </param>
/// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
/// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
/// </param>
private async void WaitFor(ValueTask task, bool ignoreCancellation)
{
try
{
await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (OperationCanceledException)
{
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
this.exception = exception;
}
finally
{
this.manualResetEvent.Set();
}
}
}
}
EDIT:
Task has Wait method, Task.Wait(), which waits for the "promise" to resolve and then continues, thus rendering it synchronous. example:
async Task<String> MyAsyncMethod() { ... }
String mySyncMethod() {
return MyAsyncMethod().Wait();
}
I prefer a non blocking approach:
Dim aw1=GenerateCodeAsync().GetAwaiter()
While Not aw1.IsCompleted
Application.DoEvents()
End While
If you have an async method called " RefreshList " then, you can call that async method from a non-async method like below.
Task.Run(async () => { await RefreshList(); });
Success story sharing
result
risks a deadlock, then when is it safe to get the result? Does every asynchronous call requireTask.Run
orConfigureAwait(false)
?AspNetSynchronizationContext.Post
serializes async continuations:Task newTask = _lastScheduledTask.ContinueWith(_ => SafeWrapCallback(action)); _lastScheduledTask = newTask;
Task.Run
to stay safe. Or use something likeWithNoContext
to reduce redundant thread switching..Result
can still deadlock if the caller is on the thread pool itself. Take a scenario where the Thread Pool is of size 32 and 32 tasks are running andWait()/Result
waiting on a yet-to-be-scheduled 33rd task that wants to run on one of the waiting threads.