Obviously the beta for Angular2 is newer than new, so there's not much information out there, but I am trying to do what I think is some fairly basic routing.
Hacking about with the quick-start code and other snippets from the https://angular.io website has resulted in the following file structure:
angular-testapp/
app/
app.component.ts
boot.ts
routing-test.component.ts
index.html
With the files being populated as follows:
index.html
<html>
<head>
<base href="/">
<title>Angular 2 QuickStart</title>
<link href="../css/bootstrap.css" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- 1. Load libraries -->
<script src="node_modules/angular2/bundles/angular2-polyfills.js"></script>
<script src="node_modules/systemjs/dist/system.src.js"></script>
<script src="node_modules/rxjs/bundles/Rx.js"></script>
<script src="node_modules/angular2/bundles/angular2.dev.js"></script>
<script src="node_modules/angular2/bundles/router.dev.js"></script>
<!-- 2. Configure SystemJS -->
<script>
System.config({
packages: {
app: {
format: 'register',
defaultExtension: 'js'
}
}
});
System.import('app/boot')
.then(null, console.error.bind(console));
</script>
</head>
<!-- 3. Display the application -->
<body>
<my-app>Loading...</my-app>
</body>
</html>
boot.ts
import {bootstrap} from 'angular2/platform/browser'
import {ROUTER_PROVIDERS} from 'angular2/router';
import {AppComponent} from './app.component'
bootstrap(AppComponent, [
ROUTER_PROVIDERS
]);
app.component.ts
import {Component} from 'angular2/core';
import {RouteConfig, ROUTER_DIRECTIVES, ROUTER_PROVIDERS, LocationStrategy, HashLocationStrategy} from 'angular2/router';
import {RoutingTestComponent} from './routing-test.component';
@Component({
selector: 'my-app',
template: `
<h1>Component Router</h1>
<a [routerLink]="['RoutingTest']">Routing Test</a>
<router-outlet></router-outlet>
`
})
@RouteConfig([
{path:'/routing-test', name: 'RoutingTest', component: RoutingTestComponent, useAsDefault: true},
])
export class AppComponent { }
routing-test.component.ts
import {Component} from 'angular2/core';
import {Router} from 'angular2/router';
@Component({
template: `
<h2>Routing Test</h2>
<p>Interesting stuff goes here!</p>
`
})
export class RoutingTestComponent { }
Attempting to run this code produces the error:
EXCEPTION: Template parse errors:
Can't bind to 'routerLink' since it isn't a known native property ("
<h1>Component Router</h1>
<a [ERROR ->][routerLink]="['RoutingTest']">Routing Test</a>
<router-outlet></router-outlet>
"): AppComponent@2:11
I found a vaguely related issue here; router-link directives broken after upgrading to angular2.0.0-beta.0. However, the "working example" in one of the answers is based on pre-beta code - which may well still work, but I would like to know why the code I have created is not working.
Any pointers would be gratefully received!
directives: [ROUTER_DIRECTIVES]
.
@Component({selector: "app"}) @View({templateUrl: "app.html", directives: [ROUTER_DIRECTIVES, RouterLink]})
directives: [ROUTER_DIRECTIVES]
and changing from [router-link] to [routerLink] I am no longer getting the error.
>=RC.5
import the RouterModule
See also https://angular.io/guide/router
@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule],
...
})
>=RC.2
app.routes.ts
import { provideRouter, RouterConfig } from '@angular/router';
export const routes: RouterConfig = [
...
];
export const APP_ROUTER_PROVIDERS = [provideRouter(routes)];
main.ts
import { bootstrap } from '@angular/platform-browser-dynamic';
import { APP_ROUTER_PROVIDERS } from './app.routes';
bootstrap(AppComponent, [APP_ROUTER_PROVIDERS]);
<=RC.1
Your code is missing
@Component({
...
directives: [ROUTER_DIRECTIVES],
...)}
You can't use directives like routerLink
or router-outlet
without making them known to your component.
While directive names were changed to be case-sensitive in Angular2, elements still use -
in the name like <router-outlet>
to be compatible with the web-components spec which require a -
in the name of custom elements.
register globally
To make ROUTER_DIRECTIVES
globally available, add this provider to bootstrap(...)
:
provide(PLATFORM_DIRECTIVES, {useValue: [ROUTER_DIRECTIVES], multi: true})
then it's no longer necessary to add ROUTER_DIRECTIVES
to each component.
For people who find this when attempting to run tests because via npm test
or ng test
using Karma or whatever else. Your .spec module needs a special router testing import to be able to build.
import { RouterTestingModule } from '@angular/router/testing';
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
imports: [RouterTestingModule],
declarations: [AppComponent],
});
http://www.kirjai.com/ng2-component-testing-routerlink-routeroutlet/
spec
file that I had to add this. Thanks @raykrow!
RouterModule
, then you need to call forRoot
to satisfy the module and then you should provide the BASE_HREF
and ...
Can't bind to 'active' since it isn't a known property of 'a'.
in several of my unit tests, and have imported RouterTestingModule
.
Word of caution when coding with Visual Studio (2013)
I have wasted 4 to 5 hours trying to debug this error. I tried all the solutions that I found on StackOverflow by the letter and I still got this error: Can't bind to 'routerlink' since it isn't a known native property
Be aware, Visual Studio has the nasty habit of autoformatting text when you copy/paste code. I always got a small instantaneous adjustment from VS13 (camel case disappears).
This:
<div>
<a [routerLink]="['/catalog']">Catalog</a>
<a [routerLink]="['/summary']">Summary</a>
</div>
Becomes:
<div>
<a [routerlink]="['/catalog']">Catalog</a>
<a [routerlink]="['/summary']">Summary</a>
</div>
It's a small difference, but enough to trigger the error. The ugliest part is that this small difference just kept avoiding my attention every time I copied and pasted. By sheer chance, I saw this small difference and solved it.
For >= V5
import { RouterModule, Routes } from '@angular/router';
const appRoutes: Routes = [
{path:'routing-test', component: RoutingTestComponent}
];
@NgModule({
imports: [
RouterModule.forRoot(appRoutes)
// other imports here
]
})
component:
@Component({
selector: 'my-app',
template: `
<h1>Component Router</h1>
<a routerLink="/routing-test" routerLinkActive="active">Routing Test</a>
<router-outlet></router-outlet>
`
})
For < V5
Also can use RouterLink
as a directives
ie. directives: [RouterLink]
. that worked for me
import {Router, RouteParams, RouterLink} from 'angular2/router';
@Component({
selector: 'my-app',
directives: [RouterLink],
template: `
<h1>Component Router</h1>
<a [routerLink]="['RoutingTest']">Routing Test</a>
<router-outlet></router-outlet>
`
})
@RouteConfig([
{path:'/routing-test', name: 'RoutingTest', component: RoutingTestComponent, useAsDefault: true},
])
In general, whenever you get an error like Can't bind to 'xxx' since it isn't a known native property
, the most likely cause is forgetting to specify a component or a directive (or a constant that contains the component or the directive) in the directives
metadata array. Such is the case here.
Since you did not specify RouterLink
or the constant ROUTER_DIRECTIVES
– which contains the following:
export const ROUTER_DIRECTIVES = [RouterOutlet, RouterLink, RouterLinkWithHref,
RouterLinkActive];
– in the directives
array, then when Angular parses
<a [routerLink]="['RoutingTest']">Routing Test</a>
it doesn't know about the RouterLink directive (which uses attribute selector routerLink
). Since Angular does know what the a
element is, it assumes that [routerLink]="..."
is a property binding for the a
element. But it then discovers that routerLink
is not a native property of a
elements, hence it throws the exception about the unknown property.
I've never really liked the ambiguity of the syntax. I.e., consider
<something [whatIsThis]="..." ...>
Just by looking at the HTML we can't tell if whatIsThis
is
a native property of something
a directive's attribute selector
a input property of something
We have to know which directives: [...]
are specified in the component's/directive's metadata in order to mentally interpret the HTML. And when we forget to put something into the directives
array, I feel this ambiguity makes it a bit harder to debug.
You have in your module
import {Routes, RouterModule} from '@angular/router';
you have to export the module RouteModule
example:
@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule]
})
to be able to access the functionalities for all who import this module.
I have tried all methods, which are mentioned above.But no one method works for me.finally i got solution for above issue and it is working for me.
I tried this method:
In Html:
<li><a (click)= "aboutPageLoad()" routerLinkActive="active">About</a></li>
In TS file:
aboutPageLoad() {
this.router.navigate(['/about']);
}
In my case I have imported the RouterModule in App module but not imported in my feature module. After import the router module in my EventModule the error goes away.
import {NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser';
import {EventListComponent} from './EventList.Component';
import {EventThumbnailComponent} from './EventThumbnail.Component';
import { EventService } from './shared/Event.Service'
import {ToastrService} from '../shared/toastr.service';
import {EventDetailsComponent} from './event-details/event.details.component';
import { RouterModule } from "@angular/router";
@NgModule({
imports:[BrowserModule,RouterModule],
declarations:[EventThumbnailComponent,EventListComponent,EventDetailsComponent],
exports: [EventThumbnailComponent,EventListComponent,EventDetailsComponent],
providers: [EventService,ToastrService]
})
export class EventModule {
}
If getting this error while unit testing please write this.
import { RouterTestingModule } from '@angular/router/testing';
beforeEach(async(() => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
imports: [RouterTestingModule],
declarations: [AppComponent],
});
}));
If you use shared modules, just add RouterModule to a Module where your component is declared and don't forget to add <router-outlet></router-outlet>
Referenced from here RouterLink does not work
I really appreciate @raykrow's answer when one has this problem only in a test file! That is where I encountered it.
As it is often helpful to have another way to do something as a backup, I wanted to mention this technique that also works (instead of importing RouterTestingModule
):
import { MockComponent } from 'ng2-mock-component';
. . .
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [
MockComponent({
selector: 'a',
inputs: [ 'routerLink', 'routerLinkActiveOptions' ]
}),
. . .
]
(Typically, one would use routerLink
on an <a>
element but adjust the selector accordingly for other components.)
The second reason I wanted to mention this alternate solution is that, though it served me well in a number of spec files, I ran into a problem with it in one case:
Error: Template parse errors:
More than one component matched on this element.
Make sure that only one component's selector can match a given element.
Conflicting components: ButtonComponent,Mock
I could not quite figure out how this mock and my ButtonComponent
were using the same selector, so searching for an alternate approach led me here to @raykrow's solution.
My solution is simple. I am using [href] instead of [routerLink]. I have tried all solutions for [routerLink]. None of them works in my case.
Here is my solution:
<a [href]="getPlanUrl()" target="_blank">My Plan Name</a>
Then write the getPlanUrl
function in the TS file.
Success story sharing
provide(PLATFORM_DIRECTIVES, {useValue: [ROUTER_DIRECTIVES, FORM_DIRECTIVES, ETC...], multi: true})
FORM_DIRECTIVES
are included inPLATFORM_DIRECTIVES
by default already.