我可以将 Python 3.6 的格式化字符串文字（f-strings）导入旧的 3.x、2.x Python 吗？

future-fstrings brings f-strings to Python 2.7 scripts. (And I assume 3.3-3.5 based on the documentation.)

Once you pip install it via pip install future-fstrings, you have to place a special line at the top of your code. That line is:

# -*- coding: future_fstrings -*-

Then you can use formatted string literals (f-strings) within your code:

# -*- coding: future_fstrings -*-
var = 'f-string'
print(f'hello world, this is an {var}')

Unfortunatly if you want to use it you must require Python 3.6+, same with the matrix multiplication operator @ and Python 3.5+ or yield from (Python 3.4+ I think)

These made changes to how the code is interpreted and thus throw SyntaxErrors when imported in older versions. That means you need to put them somewhere where these aren't imported in older Pythons or guarded by an eval or exec (I wouldn't recommend the latter two!).

So yes, you are right, if you want to support multiple python versions you can't use them easily.

here's what I use:

text = "Foo is {age} {units} old".format(**locals())

it unpacks (**) the dict returned by locals() which has all your local variables as a dict {variable_name: value}

Note this will not work for variables declared in an outer scope, unless you import it to the local scope with nonlocal (Python 3.0+).

you can also use

text.format(**locals(),**globals())

to include global variables in your string.

The f-strings are created by the interpreter upon tokening the f prefix - that feature alone will kill any compatibility chances.

Your closest shot is to use the keyword formatting, like

'Foo is {age} {units} old'.format(age=age, units=units)

which can be more easily refactored upon the termination of requirement for compatibility.

I just wrote a back-port compiler for f-string, called f2format. Just as you requests, you may write f-string literals in Python 3.6 flavour, and compile to a compatible version for end-users to run, just like Babel for JavaScript.

f2format provides an intelligent, yet imperfect, solution of a back-port compiler. It shall replace f-string literals with str.format methods, whilst maintaining the original layout of source code. You can simply use

f2format /path/to/the/file_or_directory

which will rewrite all Python files in place. For instance,

var = f'foo{(1+2)*3:>5}bar{"a", "b"!r}boo'

will be converted to

var = ('foo{:>5}bar{!r}boo').format(((1+2)*3), ("a", "b"))

String concatenation, conversion, format specification, multi-lines and unicodes are all treated right. Also, f2format will archive original files in case there're any syntax breaches.

I've been using 'str'.format(**locals()) for a while but made this after a while because the additional code was a bit cumbersome for each statement

def f(string):
    """
    Poor man's f-string for older python versions
    """
    import inspect

    frame = inspect.currentframe().f_back

    v = dict(**frame.f_globals)
    v.update(**frame.f_locals)

    return string.format(string, **v)

# Example
GLOBAL = 123


def main():
    foo = 'foo'
    bar = 'bar'

    print(f('{foo} != {bar} - global is {GLOBAL}'))


if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

A dirty solution using simpleeval

import re
import simpleeval
test='_someString'
lst = ['_456']

s = '123123{lst[0]}{test}'

def template__format(template, context=None):
    if context is None:
        frame = inspect.currentframe()
        context = frame.f_back.f_locals        
        del frame
    ptn =  '([^{]?){([^}]+)}'
    class counter():
        i = -1

    def count(m):
        counter.i += 1
        return m.expand('\\1{%d}'%counter.i)

    template = re.sub(ptn,string=s, repl= count)
    exprs = [x[1] for x in re.findall(ptn,s)]
    vals = map(simpleeval.SimpleEval(names=context).eval,exprs)
    res = template.format(*vals)
    return res

print (template__format(s))

Using dict() to hold name-value pairs

In addition to the approaches mentioned elsewhere in this thread (such as format(**locals()) ) the developer can create one or more python dictionaries to hold name-value pairs.

This is an obvious approach to any experienced python developer, but few discussions enumerate this option expressly, perhaps because it is such an obvious approach.

This approach is arguably advantageous relative to indiscriminate use of locals() specifically because it is less indiscriminate. It expressly uses one or more dictionaries a namespace to use with your formatted string.

Python 3 also permits unpacking multiple dictionaries (e.g., .format(**dict1,**dict2,**dict3) ... which does not work in python 2.7)

## init dict
  ddvars = dict()

  ## assign fixed values
  ddvars['firname']   =   'Huomer'
  ddvars['lasname']   =   'Huimpson'
  ddvars['age']       =   33
  pass

  ## assign computed values
  ddvars['comname']   =   '{firname} {lasname}'.format(**ddvars)
  ddvars['reprself']  =   repr(ddvars)
  ddvars['nextage']   =   ddvars['age'] + 1
  pass

  ## create and show a sample message
  mymessage = '''
  Hello {firname} {lasname}!
  Today you are {age} years old.
  On your next birthday you will be {nextage} years old!
  '''.format(**ddvars)

  print(mymessage)