ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Composer - 请求的包存在,但这些被您的约束拒绝

When I run my install from composer, I have this error :

λ composer install You are running composer with xdebug enabled. This has a major impact on runtime performance. See https://getcomposer.org/xdebug Loading composer repositories with package information Updating dependencies (including require-dev) Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.

Error :

Problem 1 - The requested package antoineb1/smoney_bundle 1.0 exists as antoineb1/smoney_bundle[dev-master] but these are rejected by your constraint.

My composer.json

{
    "name": "project",
    "license": "proprietary",
    "type": "project",
    "minimum-stability": "dev",
    "prefer-stable" : true,
    "autoload": {
        "psr-4": {
            "": "src/"
        }
    },
    "config": {
        "preferred-install": "dist"
    },
    "repositories": [
        {
            "url": "bitbucket url",
            "type": "vcs"
        }
    ],
    "require": {
        "php": ">=5.5.9",
        "antoineb1/smoney_bundle": "1.0"
    }
}

B
BVengerov

The version constraint "1.0" is interpreted internally as "1.0.0.0-stable" version.

But the only version available is:

antoineb1/smoney_bundle[dev-master].

So you could change the specified version to either one of the following depending on what version is suitable for you:

1.0.* (which is seen by composer as >=1.0.0.0-dev <1.1.0.0-dev -- probably won't work because there obviously aren't any versions in that package)

dev-master

dev-master#

@dev

etc.

See the composer schema for reference.


I have the same problem. I have a tag 1.1.0 available in my repo but composer is still saying I only have a dev-master release which is not even true, I have not any branch or tag with that name...?!?
@GuillaumeBois Composer allows using branches as versions by specifying them as dev-<branchname>, so dev-master relates to master branch. If you want to specify a specific tag, it goes like "author/package": "dev-master#v1.1.0". See this question for details.
The problem was that my tag was 1.1.0 and should have been v1.1.0 ! OMG I hate the computers...
I had this problem because I had neglected to push my tag to the remote. It is probably also worth running composer clear-cache.
For me, having "5.8.*" set in composer.json it always pulls 5.8.0 even though there's 5.8.1 tag in my remote repo ... Any ideas? :o But If I put 5.8.1 directly I get an error: Problem 1 - The requested package myrepo/advanced-custom-fields-pro v5.8.1 exists as myrepo/advanced-custom-fields-pro[v5.8.0] but these are rejected by your constraint. Any help appreciated.
M
MikeiLL

The comment by @Guillaume below this answer deserves a larger presentation.

It seems that composer wants a git release that has a v in it.

So it should be v1.1.0 and not 1.1.0.

I spent about 90 minutes looking at

mikeill/my_repo 3.3.10 requires composer/installers 1.0.*@dev -> satisfiable by composer/installers[1.0.x-dev, v1.0.0, ...] but these conflict with your requirements or minimum-stability.

And a lot of github issues as well as an SO post or two before finally discovering this thread.


Trivial yet easily overlooked
It seems that using the v prefix is the way the "grownups" do it.
O
OllieLowson

I lost a significant amount of hair, time and sanity over this question for a while - it turned out that the problem in my case was that I was specifying a version in the composer.json within the package itself as "dev-master".

Refer to: https://getcomposer.org/doc/04-schema.md#version

Where it states:

Note: Packagist uses VCS repositories, so the statement above is very much true for Packagist as well. Specifying the version yourself will most likely end up creating problems at some point due to human error.

(emphasis mine)

I removed this version element and it worked perfectly :)


Where did you remove the version element? I dont have any and this happens for a private bitbucket repo
You are correct, the other solution is to tag the version in your repo with the correct version number and it would work also
s
sibaz

I came across this question, and found another issue, which I had completely forgotten about, which someone may find useful to have to check.

In my case I had a very old git project, which had been forked some time back, and I had to merge them together (albeit the forked project hadn't had many changes). So I identified the split point on the old project, and tagged it as version for composer, so I could use that in place of the new project.

What I had forgotten though, was that originally we didn't use composer. So the file structure at the tag point was missing composer.json. I couldn't figure out why my new tags weren't appearing on the 'exists as' list of things which were 'rejected by your contraint'. Eventually I realised I had to create a branch on the old tag, cherry-pick the commit which created the composer.json for the project, and retag that, and then it all worked.

Hopefully this will jog someones memory, if they come hunting with this error message in mind.


T
Tum

After searching a while I found out the repository was missing in my composer file. Someone removed it, so therefore only previous versions worked.

...

"require": {
    "company/my-repo": "*"
}

...

"repositories": [
    {
        "type": "vcs",
        "url": "git@bitbucket.org:company/my-repo.git"
    },
],

...

关注公众号,不定期副业成功案例分享
关注公众号

不定期副业成功案例分享

领先一步获取最新的外包任务吗?

立即订阅