I was wondering about the best practices for indicating invalid argument combinations in Python. I've come across a few situations where you have a function like so:
def import_to_orm(name, save=False, recurse=False):
"""
:param name: Name of some external entity to import.
:param save: Save the ORM object before returning.
:param recurse: Attempt to import associated objects as well. Because you
need the original object to have a key to relate to, save must be
`True` for recurse to be `True`.
:raise BadValueError: If `recurse and not save`.
:return: The ORM object.
"""
pass
The only annoyance with this is that every package has its own, usually slightly differing BadValueError
. I know that in Java there exists java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
-- is it well understood that everybody will be creating their own BadValueError
s in Python or is there another, preferred method?
I would just raise ValueError, unless you need a more specific exception..
def import_to_orm(name, save=False, recurse=False):
if recurse and not save:
raise ValueError("save must be True if recurse is True")
There's really no point in doing class BadValueError(ValueError):pass
- your custom class is identical in use to ValueError, so why not use that?
I would inherit from ValueError
class IllegalArgumentError(ValueError):
pass
It is sometimes better to create your own exceptions, but inherit from a built-in one, which is as close to what you want as possible.
If you need to catch that specific error, it is helpful to have a name.
I think the best way to handle this is the way python itself handles it. Python raises a TypeError. For example:
$ python -c 'print(sum())'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: sum expected at least 1 arguments, got 0
Our junior dev just found this page in a google search for "python exception wrong arguments" and I'm surprised that the obvious (to me) answer wasn't ever suggested in the decade since this question was asked.
int('a')
). source
sum()
with no arguments, which is a TypeError
, but the OP was concerned with "illegal" combinations of argument values when the argument types are correct. In this case, both save
and recurse
are bools, but if recurse
is True
then save
should not be False
. This is a ValueError
. I agree that some interpretation of the question's title would be answered by TypeError
, but not for the example that's presented.
It depends on what the problem with the arguments is.
If the argument has the wrong type, raise a TypeError. For example, when you get a string instead of one of those Booleans.
if not isinstance(save, bool):
raise TypeError(f"Argument save must be of type bool, not {type(save)}")
Note, however, that in Python we rarely make any checks like this. If the argument really is invalid, some deeper function will probably do the complaining for us. And if we only check the boolean value, perhaps some code user will later just feed it a string knowing that non-empty strings are always True. It might save him a cast.
If the arguments have invalid values, raise ValueError. This seems more appropriate in your case:
if recurse and not save:
raise ValueError("If recurse is True, save should be True too")
Or in this specific case, have a True value of recurse imply a True value of save. Since I would consider this a recovery from an error, you might also want to complain in the log.
if recurse and not save:
logging.warning("Bad arguments in import_to_orm() - if recurse is True, so should save be")
save = True
I've mostly just seen the builtin ValueError
used in this situation.
You would most likely use ValueError
(raise ValueError()
in full) in this case, but it depends on the type of bad value. For example, if you made a function that only allows strings, and the user put in an integer instead, you would you TypeError
instead. If a user inputted a wrong input (meaning it has the right type but it does not qualify certain conditions) a Value Error
would be your best choice. Value
Error can also be used to block the program from other exceptions, for example, you could use a ValueError
to stop the shell form raising a ZeroDivisionError
, for example, in this function:
def function(number):
if not type(number) == int and not type(number) == float:
raise TypeError("number must be an integer or float")
if number == 5:
raise ValueError("number must not be 5")
else:
return 10/(5-number)
P.S. For a list of python built-in exceptions, go here: https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html (This is the official python databank)
Agree with Markus' suggestion to roll your own exception, but the text of the exception should clarify that the problem is in the argument list, not the individual argument values. I'd propose:
class BadCallError(ValueError):
pass
Used when keyword arguments are missing that were required for the specific call, or argument values are individually valid but inconsistent with each other. ValueError
would still be right when a specific argument is right type but out of range.
Shouldn't this be a standard exception in Python?
In general, I'd like Python style to be a bit sharper in distinguishing bad inputs to a function (caller's fault) from bad results within the function (my fault). So there might also be a BadArgumentError to distinguish value errors in arguments from value errors in locals.
KeyError
for keyword not found (since a missing explicit keyword is semantically identical to a **kwargs
dict that is missing that key).
I'm not sure I agree with inheritance from ValueError
-- my interpretation of the documentation is that ValueError
is only supposed to be raised by builtins... inheriting from it or raising it yourself seems incorrect.
Raised when a built-in operation or function receives an argument that has the right type but an inappropriate value, and the situation is not described by a more precise exception such as IndexError.
ValueError
for this sort of thing, so I think you're trying to read too much into the documentation.
Success story sharing
math.sqrt(-1)
, that's a programming error that needs to be fixed anyway.ValueError
is not intended to be caught in normal program execution or it would derive fromRuntimeError
.ValueError
instead?