ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

CSS Image size, how to fill, but not stretch?

I have an image, and I want to set it a specific width and height (in pixels)

But If I set width and height using css (width:150px; height:100px), image will be stretched, and It may be ugly.

How to Fill images to a specific size using CSS, and not stretching it?

Example of fill and stretching image:

Original Image:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg

Stretched Image:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/L1ihk.jpg

Filled Image:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/vwi7R.jpg

Please note that in the Filled image example above: first, image is resized to 150x255 (maintained aspect ratio), and then, it cropped to 150x100.

Try just setting the width and height should adjust accordingly
It stretches the image. see this: jsfiddle.net/D7E3E
It takes a part of image not resizing!
Chris Coyier's also has some good solutions to this: css-tricks.com/perfect-full-page-background-image
VERY IMPORTANT: this is an incredibly bad practice for SEO purposes. If you are using it as a background image then it works ok, but if you want the image to be found by Google it WILL NOT get indexed if it is only a background image.

a
afonsoduarte

You can use the css property object-fit. ("sets how the content of a replaced element, such as an <img> or <video>, should be resized to fit its container.")

.cover { object-fit: cover; width: 50px; height: 100px; }

See example here

There's a polyfill for IE: https://github.com/anselmh/object-fit

Related: object-position (specifies the alignment of an element's contents within its box.)


Interesting to see that this can be done with img tags too (not only background-image method as described in the answer above). Thank you :)
Unfortunately background-size is rarely a viable solution in my projects. You're less likely to receive any SEO benefit and cannot provide an ALT tag, caption, etc to accompany the image where you may want to provide additional context for screen readers.
This is cool, but there is no IE support. None of the polyfills work anymore.
Just using object-fit: cover; does it. Thanks a lot
now 2017 browser which support it should increased. When the image is bigger `scale-down' give better option. scale-down
j
johannchopin

If you want to use the image as a CSS background, there is an elegant solution. Simply use cover or contain in the background-size CSS3 property.

.container { width: 150px; height: 100px; background-image: url("http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg"); background-size: cover; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-position: 50% 50%; }

While cover will give you a scaled up image, contain will give you a scaled down image. Both will preserve the pixel aspect ratio.

http://jsfiddle.net/uTHqs/ (using cover)

http://jsfiddle.net/HZ2FT/ (using contain)

This approach has the advantage of being friendly to Retina displays as per Thomas Fuchs' quick guide.

It's worth mentioning that browser support for both attributes excludes IE6-8.


Since you can resize the image purely in the CSS, this allows you to use a large image and then scale it down according to each device's pixel density by using media queries.
Could you explain why in this case the background-position seems to indicate the position of the center of the image rather than it's top-left corner? Is it a consequence of background-size: cover?
mine just covers the entire DIV expanding the image. I don't see the curve ending.
What is background-repeat: no-repeat; for? If the image covers it's container, it won't repeat itself anyway.
'background-position' could be set to 'center center' too. eg.: .container { ... background-position: center center; }
H
Hakan Fıstık

Enhancement on the accepted answer by @afonsoduarte.
in case you are using bootstrap

Providing width:100% on the style. This is helpful if you are using bootstrap and want the image to stretch all the available width. Specifying the height property is optional, You can remove/keep it as you need .cover { object-fit: cover; width: 100%; /*height: 300px; optional, you can remove it, but in my case it was good */ } By the way, there is NO need to provide the height and width attributes on the image element because they will be overridden by the style. so it is enough to write something like this.


Exactly what I was looking for.
You need a kiss!
I had to use width: 100% and height: 100% for this to take up all the space in both directions.
H
Hakan Fıstık

The only real way is to have a container around your image and use overflow:hidden:

HTML

<div class="container"><img src="ckk.jpg" /></div>

CSS

.container {
    width: 300px;
    height: 200px;
    display: block;
    position: relative;
    overflow: hidden;
}

.container img {
    position: absolute;
    top: 0;
    left: 0;
    width: 100%;
}

It's a pain in CSS to do what you want and center the image, there is a quick fix in jquery such as:

var conHeight = $(".container").height();
var imgHeight = $(".container img").height();
var gap = (imgHeight - conHeight) / 2;
$(".container img").css("margin-top", -gap);

http://jsfiddle.net/x86Q7/2/


Thanks. it worked, but it crops the image from top. (see this: jsfiddle.net/x86Q7 ) Isn't there any way to crop image from center?
@MahdiGhiasi: Change top and left properties in .container img css!!
I may set margin-top of image by for example 50px (see this: jsfiddle.net/x86Q7/1 ), but How to crop it from real center? (Without jQuery?)
Ahh sorry didnt see your comment but i added the jquery just incase :)
Great solution! For me the vertical fill was more important than the horizontal, so I just had to change "width: 100%" to "height: 100%" for the '.container img' class. Thank you!
H
Hakan Fıstık

CSS solution no JS and no background image:

Method 1 "margin auto" ( IE8+ - NOT FF!):

div{ width:150px; height:100px; position:relative; overflow:hidden; } div img{ position:absolute; top:0; bottom:0; margin: auto; width:100%; }

Original:

image

Wrapped:

image

http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/

Method 2 "transform" ( IE9+ ):

div{ width:150px; height:100px; position:relative; overflow:hidden; } div img{ position:absolute; width:100%; top: 50%; -ms-transform: translateY(-50%); -webkit-transform: translateY(-50%); transform: translateY(-50%); }

Original:

image

Wrapped:

image

http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/1/

Method 2 can be used to center an image in a fixed width / height container. Both can overflow - and if the image is smaller than the container it will still be centered.

http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/3/

Method 3 "double wrapper" ( IE8+ - NOT FF! ):

.outer{ width:150px; height:100px; margin: 200px auto; /* just for example */ border: 1px solid red; /* just for example */ /* overflow: hidden; */ /* TURN THIS ON */ position: relative; } .inner { border: 1px solid green; /* just for example */ position: absolute; top: 0; bottom: 0; margin: auto; display: table; left: 50%; } .inner img { display: block; border: 1px solid blue; /* just for example */ position: relative; right: 50%; opacity: .5; /* just for example */ }

image

http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/5/

Method 4 "double wrapper AND double image" ( IE8+ ):

.outer{ width:150px; height:100px; margin: 200px auto; /* just for example */ border: 1px solid red; /* just for example */ /* overflow: hidden; */ /* TURN THIS ON */ position: relative; } .inner { border: 1px solid green; /* just for example */ position: absolute; top: 50%; bottom: 0; display: table; left: 50%; } .inner .real_image { display: block; border: 1px solid blue; /* just for example */ position: absolute; bottom: 50%; right: 50%; opacity: .5; /* just for example */ } .inner .placeholder_image{ opacity: 0.1; /* should be 0 */ }

image image

http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/26/

Method 1 has slightly better support - you have to set the width OR height of image!

With the prefixes method 2 also has decent support ( from ie9 up ) - Method 2 has no support on Opera mini!

Method 3 uses two wrappers - can overflow width AND height.

Method 4 uses a double image ( one as placeholder ) this gives some extra bandwidth overhead, but even better crossbrowser support.

Method 1 and 3 don't seem to work with Firefox


This is the only one that actually works (minus js solutions). Thanks!
It is limited to overflowing either height or width, but an interesting solution.
@Jake - It is possible to overflow width AND height with method 2 above - see my updated answer with the extra fiddle.
Yeah. It is definitely a great answer. I will fool around with it some more. It was a little quirky for an image wider than taller that needed to be responsive, but there are lots of applications for this.
@Jake - Cool - I found a 3th method to do horizontal centering. I extended this method to also support vertical centering. I will post my addition as a 3th method above. It seems it is IE7+ proof ( even lower possibly ). Here is the original answer: stackoverflow.com/questions/3300660/…
e
earl3s

Solution not requiring image as a background and will auto-resize without being cut-off or distorting.

Another solution is to put the image in a container with the desired width and height. Using this method you would not have to set the image as a background image of an element.

Then you can do this with an img tag and just set a max-width and max-height on the element.

CSS:

.imgContainer {
    display: block;
    width: 150px; 
    height: 100px;
}

.imgContainer img {
    max-width: 100%;
    max-height: 100%;
}

HTML:

<div class='imgContainer'>
    <img src='imagesrc.jpg' />
</div>

Now when you change the size of the container the image will automatically grow as large as it can without going outside the bounds or distorting.

If you want to center the image vertically and horizontally you can change the container css to:

.imgContainer {
    display: table-cell;
    width: 150px; 
    height: 100px;
    text-align: center;
    vertical-align: middle;
}

Here is a JS Fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/9kUYC/2/


It's not the same as cover in CSS, where one of the resulting dimensions is always beyond 100% (or equal in edge case)
No, this solution makes sure that it's never stretched beyond 100%, which is what part of the question was about. They didn't want to have the image distort or grow beyond the original dimensions.
The question was "How to Fill" with an example of filled image, which is obviously cropped.
But what if you need the image to be responsive? Defining a specific width and height isn't going to work 😕
It was what I needed. Thanks!
d
dmegatool

Not using css background

Only 1 div to clip it

Resized to minimum width than keep correct aspect ratio

Crop from center (vertically and horizontally, you can adjust that with the top, lef & transform)

Be careful if you're using a theme or something, they'll often declare img max-width at 100%. You got to make none. Test it out :)

https://jsfiddle.net/o63u8sh4/

<p>Original:</p>
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>

<p>Wrapped:</p>
<div>
    <img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
</div>


div{
  width:150px; 
  height:100px; 
  position:relative;
  overflow:hidden;
}
div img{
  min-width:100%;
  min-height:100%;
  height:auto;
  position:relative;
  top:50%;
  left:50%;
  transform:translateY(-50%) translateX(-50%);
}

This is the answer I was looking for.
This is what I wanted to do for a long time, thank you ;)
min-width:100% and min-height:100% on the image itself made the difference compared to all the tones of answers to this and equivalent questions on the net!
r
ramdog

Building off of @Dominic Green's answer using jQuery, here is a solution that should work for images that are either wider than they are high or higher than they are wide.

http://jsfiddle.net/grZLR/4/

There is probably a more elegant way of doing the JavaScript, but this does work.

function myTest() {
  var imgH = $("#my-img").height();
  var imgW = $("#my-img").width();
  if(imgW > imgH) {
    $(".container img").css("height", "100%");
    var conWidth = $(".container").width();
    var imgWidth = $(".container img").width();
    var gap = (imgWidth - conWidth)/2;
    $(".container img").css("margin-left", -gap);
  } else {
    $(".container img").css("width", "100%");
    var conHeight = $(".container").height();
    var imgHeight = $(".container img").height();
    var gap = (imgHeight - conHeight)/2;
    $(".container img").css("margin-top", -gap);
  }
}
myTest();

A
Aidan Feldman

I helped build a jQuery plugin called Fillmore, which handles the background-size: cover in browsers that support it, and has a shim for those that don't. Give it a look!


M
Manoj Selvin

This will Fill images to a specific size, without stretching it or without cropping it

img{
    width:150px;  //your requirement size
    height:100px; //your requirement size

/*Scale down will take the necessary specified space that is 150px x 100px without stretching the image*/
    object-fit:scale-down;
}

O
Om Fuke

after reading StackOverflow answers the simple solution I got is

.profilePosts div {

background: url("xyz");
background-size: contain;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: x;
height: y;

}

w
woutr_be

Try something like this: http://jsfiddle.net/D7E3E/4/

Using a container with overflow: hidden

EDIT: @Dominic Green beat me.


Thanks. it worked, but it crops the image from top. (see this: jsfiddle.net/x86Q7 ) Isn't there any way to crop image from center?
Might be rather difficult with CSS, this is the best I could come up with jsfiddle.net/D7E3E/5
Yes, to get it centered correctly, you should use jQuery, might be a lot easier.
N
Nodira

I think it's quite late for this answer. Anyway hope this will help somebody in the future. I faced the problem positioning the cards in angular. There are cards displayed for array of events. If image width of the event is big for card, the image should be shown by cropping from two sides and height of 100 %. If image height is long, images' bottom part is cropped and width is 100 %. Here is my pure css solution for this:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/cNPxd.png

HTML:

 <span class="block clear img-card b-b b-light text-center" [ngStyle]="{'background-image' : 'url('+event.image+')'}"></span>

CSS

.img-card {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-position: 50% 50%;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}

i can't fathom how this works but it does. You need to position the span absolutely top:0;right:0;bottom:0;left:0 inside the relatively positioned parent to dimension it.
Thank you for feedback dear Mike, I'm happy if this was helpful. Do you want me to update the answer with your comment?
M
Mohammadreza Askari

you can do it by 'flex' display. for me!:

.avatar-img { display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: stretch; border-radius: 50%; border: 1px solid #dee2e6; height: 5.5rem; width: 5.5rem; overflow: hidden; } .avatar-img > img { flex-grow: 1; object-fit: cover; }

Test!'s profile photo
Test!'s profile photo


It's simple and really effective, thank you.
@mqbakamqbaka your welcome, and thanks for your feedback.
s
suyash1798

To fit image in fullscreen try this:

background-repeat: round;


u
user3181614
<div class="container">
     <img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg"/>
</div>

<style>
.container {
       width: 150px;
       height: 100px;
       overflow: hidden;
}
</style>

l
lewishole

As far as I know, there is a plugin to make this simple.

jQuery Plugin: Auto transform <img> into background style

<img class="fill" src="image.jpg" alt="Fill Image"></img>

<script>
    $("img.fill").img2bg();
</script>

Besides, this way also fulfills the accessibility needs. As this plugin will NOT remove your tag from your codes, the screen reader still tells you the ALT text instead of skipping it.


R
Rohan Devaki

you have to use background-size : cover in the css

js code

 <div>
   <div className={styles.banner}>banner</div>
 </div>

css code

.banner{
  background: 
    url("./images/home-bg.jpg");
  background-size: cover;
  height: 53rem;
  width: 100%;
}

object fit is not working

background-size: contain is also not working