Functional style of Java 8's Optional.ifPresent and if-not-Present?

If you are using Java 9+, you can use ifPresentOrElse() method:

opt.ifPresentOrElse(
   value -> System.out.println("Found: " + value),
   () -> System.out.println("Not found")
);

---

For me the answer of @Dane White is OK, first I did not like using Runnable but I could not find any alternatives.

Here another implementation I preferred more:

public class OptionalConsumer<T> {
    private Optional<T> optional;

    private OptionalConsumer(Optional<T> optional) {
        this.optional = optional;
    }

    public static <T> OptionalConsumer<T> of(Optional<T> optional) {
        return new OptionalConsumer<>(optional);
    }

    public OptionalConsumer<T> ifPresent(Consumer<T> c) {
        optional.ifPresent(c);
        return this;
    }

    public OptionalConsumer<T> ifNotPresent(Runnable r) {
        if (!optional.isPresent()) {
            r.run();
        }
        return this;
    }
}

Then:

Optional<Any> o = Optional.of(...);
OptionalConsumer.of(o).ifPresent(s -> System.out.println("isPresent " + s))
                .ifNotPresent(() -> System.out.println("! isPresent"));

Update 1:

the above solution for the traditional way of development when you have the value and want to process it but what if I want to define the functionality and the execution will be then, check below enhancement;

public class OptionalConsumer<T> implements Consumer<Optional<T>> {
private final Consumer<T> c;
private final Runnable r;

public OptionalConsumer(Consumer<T> c, Runnable r) {
    super();
    this.c = c;
    this.r = r;
}

public static <T> OptionalConsumer<T> of(Consumer<T> c, Runnable r) {
    return new OptionalConsumer(c, r);
}

@Override
public void accept(Optional<T> t) {
    if (t.isPresent()) {
        c.accept(t.get());
    }
    else {
        r.run();
    }
}

Then could be used as:

Consumer<Optional<Integer>> c = OptionalConsumer.of(
    System.out::println, 
    () -> System.out.println("Not fit")
);

IntStream.range(0, 100)
    .boxed()
    .map(i -> Optional.of(i)
    .filter(j -> j % 2 == 0))
    .forEach(c);

In this new code you have 3 things:

can define the functionality before the existing of an object easy. not creating object reference for each Optional, only one, you have so less memory than less GC. it is implementing consumer for better usage with other components.

By the way, now its name is more descriptive it is actually Consumer>

---

Java 9 introduces

ifPresentOrElse if a value is present, performs the given action with the value, otherwise performs the given empty-based action.

See excellent Optional in Java 8 cheat sheet.

It provides all answers for most use cases.

Short summary below

ifPresent() - do something when Optional is set

opt.ifPresent(x -> print(x)); 
opt.ifPresent(this::print);

filter() - reject (filter out) certain Optional values.

opt.filter(x -> x.contains("ab")).ifPresent(this::print);

map() - transform value if present

opt.map(String::trim).filter(t -> t.length() > 1).ifPresent(this::print);

orElse()/orElseGet() - turning empty Optional to default T

int len = opt.map(String::length).orElse(-1);
int len = opt.
    map(String::length).
    orElseGet(() -> slowDefault());     //orElseGet(this::slowDefault)

orElseThrow() - lazily throw exceptions on empty Optional

opt.
filter(s -> !s.isEmpty()).
map(s -> s.charAt(0)).
orElseThrow(IllegalArgumentException::new);

---

An alternative is:

System.out.println(opt.map(o -> "Found")
                      .orElse("Not found"));

I don't think it improves readability though.

Or as Marko suggested, use a ternary operator:

System.out.println(opt.isPresent() ? "Found" : "Not found");

---

Another solution would be to use higher-order functions as follows

opt.<Runnable>map(value -> () -> System.out.println("Found " + value))
   .orElse(() -> System.out.println("Not Found"))
   .run();

---

There isn't a great way to do it out of the box. If you want to be using your cleaner syntax on a regular basis, then you can create a utility class to help out:

public class OptionalEx {
    private boolean isPresent;

    private OptionalEx(boolean isPresent) {
        this.isPresent = isPresent;
    }

    public void orElse(Runnable runner) {
        if (!isPresent) {
            runner.run();
        }
    }

    public static <T> OptionalEx ifPresent(Optional<T> opt, Consumer<? super T> consumer) {
        if (opt.isPresent()) {
            consumer.accept(opt.get());
            return new OptionalEx(true);
        }
        return new OptionalEx(false);
    }
}

Then you can use a static import elsewhere to get syntax that is close to what you're after:

import static com.example.OptionalEx.ifPresent;

ifPresent(opt, x -> System.out.println("found " + x))
    .orElse(() -> System.out.println("NOT FOUND"));

---

If you can use only Java 8 or lower:

1) if you don't have spring-data the best way so far is:

opt.<Runnable>map(param -> () -> System.out.println(param))
      .orElse(() -> System.out.println("no-param-specified"))
      .run();

Now I know it's not so readable and even hard to understand for someone, but looks fine for me personally and I don't see another nice fluent way for this case.

2) if you're lucky enough and you can use spring-data the best way is Optionals#ifPresentOrElse:

Optionals.ifPresentOrElse(opt, System.out::println,
      () -> System.out.println("no-param-specified"));

If you can use Java 9, you should definitely go with:

opt.ifPresentOrElse(System.out::println,
      () -> System.out.println("no-param-specified"));

---

You cannot call orElse after ifPresent, the reason is, orElse is called on an optiional but ifPresent returns void. So the best approach to achieve is ifPresentOrElse. It could be like this:

op.ifPresentOrElse( 
            (value) 
                -> { System.out.println( 
                         "Value is present, its: "
                         + value); }, 
            () 
                -> { System.out.println( 
                         "Value is empty"); }); 

---

The described behavior can be achieved by using Vavr (formerly known as Javaslang), an object-functional library for Java 8+, that implements most of Scala constructs (being Scala a more expressive language with a way richer type system built on JVM). It is a very good library to add to your Java projects to write pure functional code.

Vavr provides the Option monad that provides functions to work with the Option type such as:

fold: to map the value of the option on both cases (defined/empty)

onEmpty: allows to execute a Runnable when option is empty

peek: allows to consume the value of the option (when defined).

and it is also Serializable on the contrary of Optional which means you can safely use it as method argument and instance member.

Option follows the monad laws at difference to the Java's Optional "pseudo-monad" and provides a richer API. And of course you can make it from a Java's Optional (and the other way around): Option.ofOptional(javaOptional) –Vavr is focused on interoperability.

Going to the example:

// AWESOME Vavr functional collections (immutable for the gread good :)
// fully convertible to Java's counterparts.
final Map<String, String> map = Map("key1", "value1", "key2", "value2");

final Option<String> opt = map.get("nonExistentKey"); // you're safe of null refs!
        
final String result = opt.fold(
        () -> "Not found!!!",                // Option is None
        val -> "Found the value: " + val     // Option is Some(val)
);

Moreover, all Vavr types are convertible to its Java counterparts, for the sake of the example: Optional javaOptional = opt.toJava(), very easy :) Of course the conversion also exists in the other way: Option option = Option.ofOptional(javaOptional).

N.B. Vavr offers a io.vavr.API class with a lot of convenient static methods =)

Further reading

Null reference, the billion dollar mistake

N.B. This is only a very little example of what Vavr offers (pattern matching, streams a.k.a. lazy evaluated lists, monadic types, immutable collections,...).

---

The problem here:

optional
  .map(object -> {
    System.out.println("If present.");
    return null;
  })
  .orElseGet( () -> {
    System.out.println("If empty.");
    return null;
  });

Is that map() converts the null returned by the first function to empty(); it then returns empty(). As it returns empty(), it prompts the invocation of the second function. Note that orElseGet() does not convert the null returned by the second function to empty(), so it will return null.

See the implementation of map():

public<U> Optional<U> map(Function<? super T, ? extends U> mapper) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(mapper);
    if (!isPresent())
        return empty();
    else {
        return Optional.ofNullable(mapper.apply(value));
    }
}

And the implementation of orElseGet():

public T orElseGet(Supplier<? extends T> other) {
    return value != null ? value : other.get();
}

Thus when executed:

if optional.isPresent(), the system will print If present., then If empty., and the expression will evaluate to null.

if !optional.isPresent(), the system will print If empty., and the expression will evaluate to null.

If the function provided to map() returned any other value - any other value - the code would work as you expect, with the function provided to map() being executed if isPresent() and the function provided to orElseGet() if !isPresent():

For example, this:

optional
  .map(data -> {
    System.out.println("If present.");
    return 0;
  })
  .orElseGet( () -> {
    System.out.println("If empty.");
    return 0;
  });

When executed:

if optional.isPresent(), the system will print If present., and the expression will evaluate to 0.

if !optional.isPresent(), the system will print If empty., and the expression will evaluate to 0.

If your specific case, I suggest that your insert and update methods return, say, the persisted object, or the id of the persisted object, or something similarly useful; then you can use code similar to this:

final Object persist = optional
  .map(object -> {
    System.out.println("If present.");
    return update(object);
  })
  .orElseGet( () -> {
    System.out.println("If empty.");
    return insert(new Object());
  });

---

Another solution could be following:

This is how you use it:

    final Opt<String> opt = Opt.of("I'm a cool text");
    opt.ifPresent()
        .apply(s -> System.out.printf("Text is: %s\n", s))
        .elseApply(() -> System.out.println("no text available"));

Or in case you in case of the opposite use case is true:

    final Opt<String> opt = Opt.of("This is the text");
    opt.ifNotPresent()
        .apply(() -> System.out.println("Not present"))
        .elseApply(t -> /*do something here*/);

This are the ingredients:

Little modified Function interface, just for the "elseApply" method Optional enhancement A little bit of curring :-)

The "cosmetically" enhanced Function interface.

@FunctionalInterface
public interface Fkt<T, R> extends Function<T, R> {

    default R elseApply(final T t) {
        return this.apply(t);
    }

}

And the Optional wrapper class for enhancement:

public class Opt<T> {

    private final Optional<T> optional;

    private Opt(final Optional<T> theOptional) {
        this.optional = theOptional;
    }
    
    public static <T> Opt<T> of(final T value) {
        return new Opt<>(Optional.of(value));
    }

    public static <T> Opt<T> of(final Optional<T> optional) {
        return new Opt<>(optional);
    }
    
    public static <T> Opt<T> ofNullable(final T value) {
        return new Opt<>(Optional.ofNullable(value));
    }
    
    public static <T> Opt<T> empty() {
        return new Opt<>(Optional.empty());
    }

    private final BiFunction<Consumer<T>, Runnable, Void> ifPresent = (present, notPresent) -> {
        if (this.optional.isPresent()) {
            present.accept(this.optional.get());
        } else {
            notPresent.run();
        }
        return null;
    };

   private final BiFunction<Runnable, Consumer<T>, Void> ifNotPresent = (notPresent, present) -> {
        if (!this.optional.isPresent()) {
            notPresent.run();
        } else {
            present.accept(this.optional.get());
        }
        return null;
    };

    public Fkt<Consumer<T>, Fkt<Runnable, Void>> ifPresent() {
        return Opt.curry(this.ifPresent);
    }

    public Fkt<Runnable, Fkt<Consumer<T>, Void>> ifNotPresent() {
        return Opt.curry(this.ifNotPresent);
    }

    private static <X, Y, Z> Fkt<X, Fkt<Y, Z>> curry(final BiFunction<X, Y, Z> function) {
        return (final X x) -> (final Y y) -> function.apply(x, y);
    }
}

This should do the trick and could serve as a basic template how to deal with such requirements.

The basic idea here is following. In a non functional style programming world you would probably implement a method taking two parameter where the first is a kind of runnable code which should be executed in case the value is available and the other parameter is the runnable code which should be run in case the value is not available. For the sake of better readability, you can use curring to split the function of two parameter in two functions of one parameter each. This is what I basically did here.

Hint: Opt also provides the other use case where you want to execute a piece of code just in case the value is not available. This could be done also via Optional.filter.stuff but I found this much more readable.

Hope that helps!

Additional Info:

There is another way to have say "if then else" using currying:

public static <X, Y> Function<Predicate<X>, Function<Function<X, Y>, Function<Function<X, Y>, Y>>> ifThenElse(X input) {
  return (final Predicate<X> pred) -> (final Function<X, Y> ifPresent) -> (final Function<X, Y> ifNotPresent) -> pred.test(input) ? ifPresent.apply(input) : ifNotPresent.apply(input);
}

This way it is possible to say:

final String result = ifThenElse("fancy")
  .apply(input -> input.contains("fancy")) /* test      */
  .apply(input -> input.toUpperCase())     /* if-case   */
  .apply(input -> input.toLowerCase());    /* else-case */

---

In case you want store the value:

Pair.of<List<>, List<>> output = opt.map(details -> Pair.of(details.a, details.b))).orElseGet(() -> Pair.of(Collections.emptyList(), Collections.emptyList()));

---

Supposing that you have a list and avoiding the isPresent() issue (related with optionals) you could use .iterator().hasNext() to check if not present.

---