ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

What represents a double in sql server?

I have a couple of properties in C# which are double and I want to store these in a table in SQL Server, but noticed there is no double type, so what is best to use, decimal or float?

This will store latitude and longitude values, so I need the most accurate precision.

Thanks for the responses so far.

Here are the CLR datatype mappings to SQL Server: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.sqldbtype.aspx
There is a great thread on MSDN describing the primary difference between FLOAT and DECIMAL. In short, Float is approximate and cannot represent some values. Look at the accepted answer.

r
richardtallent
float

Or if you want to go old-school:

real

You can also use float(53), but it means the same thing as float.

("real" is equivalent to float(24), not float/float(53).)

The decimal(x,y) SQL Server type is for when you want exact decimal numbers rather than floating point (which can be approximations). This is in contrast to the C# "decimal" data type, which is more like a 128-bit floating point number.

MSSQL's float type is equivalent to the 64-bit double type in .NET. (My original answer from 2011 said there could be a slight difference in mantissa, but I've tested this in 2020 and they appear to be 100% compatible in their binary representation of both very small and very large numbers -- see https://dotnetfiddle.net/wLX5Ox for my test).

To make things more confusing, a "float" in C# is only 32-bit, so it would be more equivalent in SQL to the real/float(24) type in MSSQL than float/float(53).

In your specific use case... All you need is 5 places after the decimal point to represent latitude and longitude within about one-meter precision, and you only need up to three digits before the decimal point for the degrees. Float(24) or decimal(8,5) will best fit your needs in MSSQL, and using float in C# is good enough, you don't need double. In fact, your users will probably thank you for rounding to 5 decimal places rather than having a bunch of insignificant digits coming along for the ride.


You say float, David says decimal, now I am even more confused :)
I'm using doubles in c# and these values will be latitude and longitude values in their respective columns.
I have to concur, and admit I was off base. I was introduced to decimal in the IBM DB2 world, where decimal is a real data type, supported by all flavors of code and the database on IBM platforms. Not that it isn't a real datatype in the MS world, but it is not supported as well as in teh IBM camp. Sorry for creating any confusion.
"MSSQL float does not have exactly the same precision as the 64-bit double type in .NET (slight difference in mantissa IIRC), but it's a close enough match most uses." Do you have a reference for this? As far as I can see, both use 53 bits of significand, use 64 bits for storage, and have the same bit layout and meaning as IEEE 754.
I'm also quite curious about the question raised by @codekaizen (slight difference in mantissa). Do you have a reference or a test that exemplifies this?
C
Community

Also, here is a good answer for SQL-CLR Type Mapping with a useful chart.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/HKZCS.gif


Below link also of use; it has information additional to the above as it shows the SqlDataReader procedures and enumerations (in addition to the .NET and SQL type comparisons) docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/data/adonet/…
J
Jean-François Fabre

float is the closest equivalent.

SqlDbType Enumeration

For Lat/Long as OP mentioned.

A metre is 1/40,000,000 of the latitude, 1 second is around 30 metres. Float/double give you 15 significant figures. With some quick and dodgy mental arithmetic... the rounding/approximation errors would be the about the length of this fill stop -> "."


Sell your screen tech to Apple and make billions! (Quick arithmetic tells me you have the most extreme resolution I've ever heard of, even at latitudes close to the North/South Pole; about a billion times higher than mine.)
R
RichardOD

You should map it to FLOAT(53)- that's what LINQ to SQL does.


E
Euro Micelli

float in SQL Server actually has [edit:almost] the precision of a "double" (in a C# sense).

float is a synonym for float(53). 53 is the bits of the mantissa.

.NET double uses 54 bits for the mantissa.


Actually, IIRC, double in .NET uses a 52-bit mantissa and 11-bit exponent.
I'll be darn; you're right! I wonder what SQL does with the extra bit; it's not used for the exponent. If it did, the exponent would go up to +-616 instead of +-308. Maybe to track NULL?
Now I'm confused. Every piece of evidence points to the idea that they use the same format (as everything else in Windows). And why wouldn't they? I can't find a definite statement on the bitwise representation in SQL Server (besides the help page for float). I'll post a correction if I find out.
D
David Basarab

For SQL Sever:

Decimal Type is 128 bit signed number Float is a 64 bit signed number.

The real answer is Float, I was incorrect about decimal.

The reason is if you use a decimal you will never fill 64 bit of the decimal type.

Although decimal won't give you an error if you try to use a int type.

Here is a nice reference chart of the types.


Now it is even more confusing with two different answers :p
Don't be confused. This answer is wrong. Decimal is a base-10 type; Float (in SQL Server and the CLR) is a base-2 type.
D
DaveN59

It sounds like you can pick and choose. If you pick float, you may lose 11 digits of precision. If that's acceptable, go for it -- apparently the Linq designers thought this to be a good tradeoff.

However, if your application needs those extra digits, use decimal. Decimal (implemented correctly) is way more accurate than a float anyway -- no messy translation from base 10 to base 2 and back.


This is for storing latitude and longitude values. Does this make a difference?
This is just wrong... both float/float(53) in MSSQL and double in C# have approximately 15 digits of precision. They aren't exactly the same, but close enough. Decimal, on the other hand, is complete overkill for storing a double, and it has to go back to base 2 for all calculations in SQL Server, and to come back to C# as a double.
I stand corrected. What you are saying makes perfect sense to me. Decimal only makes sense if you keep it as a decimal value everywhere. You lose value anytime you make a conversion from base 10 to base 2 (and back).
d
d219

A Float represents double in SQL server. You can find a proof from the coding in C# in visual studio. Here I have declared Overtime as a Float in SQL server and in C#. Thus I am able to convert

int diff=4;
attendance.OverTime = Convert.ToDouble(diff);

Here OverTime is declared float type