What is the equivalent of Python dictionaries but in Bash (should work across OS X and Linux).
Bash 4
Bash 4 natively supports this feature. Make sure your script's hashbang is #!/usr/bin/env bash
or #!/bin/bash
so you don't end up using sh
. Make sure you're either executing your script directly, or execute script
with bash script
. (Not actually executing a Bash script with Bash does happen, and will be really confusing!)
You declare an associative array by doing:
declare -A animals
You can fill it up with elements using the normal array assignment operator. For example, if you want to have a map of animal[sound(key)] = animal(value)
:
animals=( ["moo"]="cow" ["woof"]="dog")
Or declare and instantiate in one line:
declare -A animals=( ["moo"]="cow" ["woof"]="dog")
Then use them just like normal arrays. Use
animals['key']='value' to set value
"${animals[@]}" to expand the values
"${!animals[@]}" (notice the !) to expand the keys
Don't forget to quote them:
echo "${animals[moo]}"
for sound in "${!animals[@]}"; do echo "$sound - ${animals[$sound]}"; done
Bash 3
Before bash 4, you don't have associative arrays. Do not use eval
to emulate them. Avoid eval
like the plague, because it is the plague of shell scripting. The most important reason is that eval
treats your data as executable code (there are many other reasons too).
First and foremost: Consider upgrading to bash 4. This will make the whole process much easier for you.
If there's a reason you can't upgrade, declare
is a far safer option. It does not evaluate data as bash code like eval
does, and as such does not allow arbitrary code injection quite so easily.
Let's prepare the answer by introducing the concepts:
First, indirection.
$ animals_moo=cow; sound=moo; i="animals_$sound"; echo "${!i}"
cow
Secondly, declare
:
$ sound=moo; animal=cow; declare "animals_$sound=$animal"; echo "$animals_moo"
cow
Bring them together:
# Set a value:
declare "array_$index=$value"
# Get a value:
arrayGet() {
local array=$1 index=$2
local i="${array}_$index"
printf '%s' "${!i}"
}
Let's use it:
$ sound=moo
$ animal=cow
$ declare "animals_$sound=$animal"
$ arrayGet animals "$sound"
cow
Note: declare
cannot be put in a function. Any use of declare
inside a bash function turns the variable it creates local to the scope of that function, meaning we can't access or modify global arrays with it. (In bash 4 you can use declare -g
to declare global variables - but in bash 4, you can use associative arrays in the first place, avoiding this workaround.)
Summary:
Upgrade to bash 4 and use declare -A for associative arrays.
Use the declare option if you can't upgrade.
Consider using awk instead and avoid the issue altogether.
There's parameter substitution, though it may be un-PC as well ...like indirection.
#!/bin/bash
# Array pretending to be a Pythonic dictionary
ARRAY=( "cow:moo"
"dinosaur:roar"
"bird:chirp"
"bash:rock" )
for animal in "${ARRAY[@]}" ; do
KEY="${animal%%:*}"
VALUE="${animal##*:}"
printf "%s likes to %s.\n" "$KEY" "$VALUE"
done
printf "%s is an extinct animal which likes to %s\n" "${ARRAY[1]%%:*}" "${ARRAY[1]##*:}"
The BASH 4 way is better of course, but if you need a hack ...only a hack will do. You could search the array/hash with similar techniques.
VALUE=${animal#*:}
to protect the case where ARRAY[$x]="caesar:come:see:conquer"
for animal in "${ARRAY[@]}"; do
This is what I was looking for here:
declare -A hashmap
hashmap["key"]="value"
hashmap["key2"]="value2"
echo "${hashmap["key"]}"
for key in ${!hashmap[@]}; do echo $key; done
for value in ${hashmap[@]}; do echo $value; done
echo hashmap has ${#hashmap[@]} elements
This did not work for me with bash 4.1.5:
animals=( ["moo"]="cow" )
Just use the file system
The file system is a tree structure that can be used as a hash map. Your hash table will be a temporary directory, your keys will be filenames, and your values will be file contents. The advantage is that it can handle huge hashmaps, and doesn't require a specific shell.
Hashtable creation
hashtable=$(mktemp -d)
Add an element
echo $value > "$hashtable/$key"
Read an element
value=$(< "$hashtable/$key")
Performance
Of course, its slow, but not that slow. I tested it on my machine, with an SSD and btrfs, and it does around 3000 element read/write per second.
mkdir -d
? (Not 4.3, on Ubuntu 14. I'd resort to mkdir /run/shm/foo
, or if that filled up RAM, mkdir /tmp/foo
.)
mktemp -d
was meant instead?
$value=$(< $hashtable/$key)
and value=$(< $hashtable/$key)
? Thanks!
You can further modify the hput()/hget() interface so that you have named hashes as follows:
hput() {
eval "$1""$2"='$3'
}
hget() {
eval echo '${'"$1$2"'#hash}'
}
and then
hput capitals France Paris
hput capitals Netherlands Amsterdam
hput capitals Spain Madrid
echo `hget capitals France` and `hget capitals Netherlands` and `hget capitals Spain`
This lets you define other maps that don't conflict (e.g., 'rcapitals' which does country lookup by capital city). But, either way, I think you'll find that this is all pretty terrible, performance-wise.
If you really want fast hash lookup, there's a terrible, terrible hack that actually works really well. It is this: write your key/values out to a temporary file, one-per line, then use 'grep "^$key"' to get them out, using pipes with cut or awk or sed or whatever to retrieve the values.
Like I said, it sounds terrible, and it sounds like it ought to be slow and do all sorts of unnecessary IO, but in practice it is very fast (disk cache is awesome, ain't it?), even for very large hash tables. You have to enforce key uniqueness yourself, etc. Even if you only have a few hundred entries, the output file/grep combo is going to be quite a bit faster - in my experience several times faster. It also eats less memory.
Here's one way to do it:
hinit() {
rm -f /tmp/hashmap.$1
}
hput() {
echo "$2 $3" >> /tmp/hashmap.$1
}
hget() {
grep "^$2 " /tmp/hashmap.$1 | awk '{ print $2 };'
}
hinit capitals
hput capitals France Paris
hput capitals Netherlands Amsterdam
hput capitals Spain Madrid
echo `hget capitals France` and `hget capitals Netherlands` and `hget capitals Spain`
Consider a solution using the bash builtin read as illustrated within the code snippet from a ufw firewall script that follows. This approach has the advantage of using as many delimited field sets (not just 2) as are desired. We have used the | delimiter because port range specifiers may require a colon, ie 6001:6010.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
readonly connections=(
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|22'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|53'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|80'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|139'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|443'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|445'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|631'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|5901'
'192.168.1.4/24|tcp|6566'
)
function set_connections(){
local range proto port
for fields in ${connections[@]}
do
IFS=$'|' read -r range proto port <<< "$fields"
ufw allow from "$range" proto "$proto" to any port "$port"
done
}
set_connections
IFS=$'|' read -r first rest <<< "$fields"
hput () {
eval hash"$1"='$2'
}
hget () {
eval echo '${hash'"$1"'#hash}'
}
hput France Paris
hput Netherlands Amsterdam
hput Spain Madrid
echo `hget France` and `hget Netherlands` and `hget Spain`
$ sh hash.sh
Paris and Amsterdam and Madrid
${var#start}
removes the text start from the beginning of the value stored in the variable var.
I agree with @lhunath and others that the associative array are the way to go with Bash 4. If you are stuck to Bash 3 (OSX, old distros that you cannot update) you can use also expr, which should be everywhere, a string and regular expressions. I like it especially when the dictionary is not too big.
Choose 2 separators that you will not use in keys and values (e.g. ',' and ':' ) Write your map as a string (note the separator ',' also at beginning and end) animals=",moo:cow,woof:dog," Use a regex to extract the values get_animal { echo "$(expr "$animals" : ".*,$1:\([^,]*\),.*")" } Split the string to list the items get_animal_items { arr=$(echo "${animals:1:${#animals}-2}" | tr "," "\n") for i in $arr do value="${i##*:}" key="${i%%:*}" echo "${value} likes to $key" done }
Now you can use it:
$ animal = get_animal "moo"
cow
$ get_animal_items
cow likes to moo
dog likes to woof
I really liked Al P's answer but wanted uniqueness enforced cheaply so I took it one step further - use a directory. There are some obvious limitations (directory file limits, invalid file names) but it should work for most cases.
hinit() {
rm -rf /tmp/hashmap.$1
mkdir -p /tmp/hashmap.$1
}
hput() {
printf "$3" > /tmp/hashmap.$1/$2
}
hget() {
cat /tmp/hashmap.$1/$2
}
hkeys() {
ls -1 /tmp/hashmap.$1
}
hdestroy() {
rm -rf /tmp/hashmap.$1
}
hinit ids
for (( i = 0; i < 10000; i++ )); do
hput ids "key$i" "value$i"
done
for (( i = 0; i < 10000; i++ )); do
printf '%s\n' $(hget ids "key$i") > /dev/null
done
hdestroy ids
It also performs a tad bit better in my tests.
$ time bash hash.sh
real 0m46.500s
user 0m16.767s
sys 0m51.473s
$ time bash dirhash.sh
real 0m35.875s
user 0m8.002s
sys 0m24.666s
Just thought I'd pitch in. Cheers!
Edit: Adding hdestroy()
A coworker just mentioned this thread. I've independently implemented hash tables within bash, and it's not dependent on version 4. From a blog post of mine in March 2010 (before some of the answers here...) entitled Hash tables in bash:
I previously used cksum
to hash but have since translated Java's string hashCode to native bash/zsh.
# Here's the hashing function
ht() {
local h=0 i
for (( i=0; i < ${#1}; i++ )); do
let "h=( (h<<5) - h ) + $(printf %d \'${1:$i:1})"
let "h |= h"
done
printf "$h"
}
# Example:
myhash[`ht foo bar`]="a value"
myhash[`ht baz baf`]="b value"
echo ${myhash[`ht baz baf`]} # "b value"
echo ${myhash[@]} # "a value b value" though perhaps reversed
echo ${#myhash[@]} # "2" - there are two values (note, zsh doesn't count right)
It's not bidirectional, and the built-in way is a lot better, but neither should really be used anyway. Bash is for quick one-offs, and such things should quite rarely involve complexity that might require hashes, except perhaps in your ~/.bashrc
and friends.
Two things, you can use memory instead of /tmp in any kernel 2.6 by using /dev/shm (Redhat) other distros may vary. Also hget can be reimplemented using read as follows:
function hget {
while read key idx
do
if [ $key = $2 ]
then
echo $idx
return
fi
done < /dev/shm/hashmap.$1
}
In addition by assuming that all keys are unique, the return short circuits the read loop and prevents having to read through all entries. If your implementation can have duplicate keys, then simply leave out the return. This saves the expense of reading and forking both grep and awk. Using /dev/shm for both implementations yielded the following using time hget on a 3 entry hash searching for the last entry :
Grep/Awk:
hget() {
grep "^$2 " /dev/shm/hashmap.$1 | awk '{ print $2 };'
}
$ time echo $(hget FD oracle)
3
real 0m0.011s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.013s
Read/echo:
$ time echo $(hget FD oracle)
3
real 0m0.004s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.004s
on multiple invocations I never saw less then a 50% improvement. This can all be attributed to fork over head, due to the use of /dev/shm
.
Prior to bash 4 there is no good way to use associative arrays in bash. Your best bet is to use an interpreted language that actually has support for such things, like awk. On the other hand, bash 4 does support them.
As for less good ways in bash 3, here is a reference than might help: http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006
Bash 3 solution:
In reading some of the answers I put together a quick little function I would like to contribute back that might help others.
# Define a hash like this
MYHASH=("firstName:Milan"
"lastName:Adamovsky")
# Function to get value by key
getHashKey()
{
declare -a hash=("${!1}")
local key
local lookup=$2
for key in "${hash[@]}" ; do
KEY=${key%%:*}
VALUE=${key#*:}
if [[ $KEY == $lookup ]]
then
echo $VALUE
fi
done
}
# Function to get a list of all keys
getHashKeys()
{
declare -a hash=("${!1}")
local KEY
local VALUE
local key
local lookup=$2
for key in "${hash[@]}" ; do
KEY=${key%%:*}
VALUE=${key#*:}
keys+="${KEY} "
done
echo $keys
}
# Here we want to get the value of 'lastName'
echo $(getHashKey MYHASH[@] "lastName")
# Here we want to get all keys
echo $(getHashKeys MYHASH[@])
I also used the bash4 way but I find and annoying bug.
I needed to update dynamically the associative array content so i used this way:
for instanceId in $instanceList
do
aws cloudwatch describe-alarms --output json --alarm-name-prefix $instanceId| jq '.["MetricAlarms"][].StateValue'| xargs | grep -E 'ALARM|INSUFFICIENT_DATA'
[ $? -eq 0 ] && statusCheck+=([$instanceId]="checkKO") || statusCheck+=([$instanceId]="allCheckOk"
done
I find out that with bash 4.3.11 appending to an existing key in the dict resulted in appending the value if already present. So for example after some repetion the content of the value was "checkKOcheckKOallCheckOK" and this was not good.
No problem with bash 4.3.39 where appenging an existent key means to substisture the actuale value if already present.
I solved this just cleaning/declaring the statusCheck associative array before the cicle:
unset statusCheck; declare -A statusCheck
I create HashMaps in bash 3 using dynamic variables. I explained how that works in my answer to: Associative arrays in Shell scripts
Also you can take a look in shell_map, which is a HashMap implementation made in bash 3.
Success story sharing
brew install bash
brew.shsudo port install bash
, for those (wisely, IMHO) unwilling to make directories in the PATH for all users writable without explicit per-process privilege escalation.