ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge, but I don't care

The bounty expires in 6 days. Answers to this question are eligible for a +50 reputation bounty. maxkoryukov wants to reward an existing answer: there is an outstanding underrated answer stackoverflow.com/a/51177844/1115187 without potentially dangerous operations

On my branch I had some files in .gitignore

On a different branch those files are not.

I want to merge the different branch into mine, and I don't care if those files are no longer ignored or not.

Unfortunately I get this:

The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge

How would I modify my pull command to overwrite those files, without me having to find, move or delete those files myself?

This is the best answer as it will only remove the files that are blocking you from merging: stackoverflow.com/a/52255219/551045
git does a good job of forcing you to deal with things you don't care about

u
userFog

The problem is that you are not tracking the files locally but identical files are tracked remotely so in order to "pull" your system would be forced to overwrite the local files which are not version controlled.

Try running

git add * 
git stash
git pull

This will track all files, remove all of your local changes to those files, and then get the files from the server.


git add -A .; git stash worked for me. The git add * variant complained about ignored paths.
I tried git add ., git stash, git pull. It worked, but I still dont get why?
For me, I had a remote file which was tracked and I had a file of the same name in my local repo which was untracked. So, if you add the local file stash the changes and then pull, the remote file should overwrite the local file.
Here's a good link to understand how this works, if anyone is interested. git-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-Tools-Stashing
// , This doesn't really go too far into the purpose of this error, really.
d
double-beep

You can try command to clear the untracked files from the local

Git 2.11 and newer versions:

git clean  -d  -f .

Older versions of Git:

git clean  -d  -f ""

Where -d can be replaced with the following:

-x ignored files are also removed as well as files unknown to Git.

-d remove untracked directories in addition to untracked files.

-f is required to force it to run.

Here is the link that can be helpful as well.


I would add -i for the interactive mode. As well as deleting the unwanted directory I also just deleted my user settings for the project :-(
It's worth scanning through the comments to a similar answer as the -x can hurt.
But this is very dangerous, and not undoable task!! you might lose a lot of files! BE CAREFUL!!
This deleted all my vendor directory on Slim Framework. BE VERY CARREFUL WITH THIS COMMAND
You should remove the 'x' from your answer. It's very dangerous!
u
user3303020

The only commands that worked for me were: (Please be careful this deletes all the local files)

git fetch --all
git reset --hard origin/{{your branch name}}

It should be noted that this answer is needed if you have removed submodules and readded them as libraries in the original repo. I needed an answer and this was all that worked.
It worked for me too. Can you please explain what is going on? I don't get it.
This deleted two of my local commits, take care before using this!
Before using --hard, think twice. The default behavior is meant to protect you against your mistakes
This should be the accepted answer :D nothing was working for me but this solution worked perfectly. thanks mate!!
E
Esteis

Safely remove/overwrite only bothersome files

When you want to merge:

git checkout -f donor-branch   # replace bothersome files with tracked versions
git checkout receiving-branch  # tracked bothersome files disappear
git merge donor-branch         # merge works

When you want to pull:

git fetch
git checkout -f origin/mybranch   # replace bothersome files with tracked versions
git checkout mybranch             # tracked bothersome files disappear
git pull origin/mybranch          # pull works

That's all you need to know to use this. Below is an explanation.

Detailed explanation

The Bothersome Files that we are going to remove:

exist in the donor branch (for git pull: the upstream branch),

do not exist in the receiving branch,

and are blocking the merge because they are present and untracked in your working directory.

git merge -f and git pull -f do not exist, but git checkout -f does.

We will use git checkout -f + git checkout to track + remove the Bothersome Files, and then your merge can proceed normally.

Step 1. This step forcibly replaces untracked Bothersome Files with tracked versions of the donor branch (it also checks out the donor branch, and updates the rest of the working dir).

git checkout -f donor-branch

Step 2. This step removes the Bothersome Files because they they are tracked in our current (donor) branch, and absent in the receiving-branch we switch to.

git checkout receiving-branch

Step 3. Now that the Bothersome Files are absent, merging in the donor branch will not overwrite any untracked files, so we get no errors.

git merge donor-branch

This is too clean to be the 7th or 8th Answer!
This is the best answer. Because it pulls everything in without having to reset or risk losing things, just overwriting what needs to be overwritten. Perfection.
Not working in my case, alas.
l
leeCoder

Remove all untracked files:

git clean  -d  -fx .

Caution: this will delete IDE files and any useful files as long as you donot track the files. Use this command with care


deleting possibly used files in a project is shouldn't be the real solution
yikes, cleaned up IDE files as well :(
This cleaned up my anaconda files in a python project
Please use this command very carefully. It deleted lots of files in my code. From the last 2 days, I am not able to execute my code again.
why is this even upvoted? this should be removed
A
Amr Mohammed

You can try that command

git clean -df

EDIT: Be aware this will delete the untracked files which can be valuable. thanks to @zhekaus


what's the use of deleting untracked directories?.. they can be valuable, you know.
Could you explain what it does??
this apparently deleted my framework vendor/core folders as well..
C
Community

If this is a one-time operation, you could just remove all untracked files from the working directory before doing the pull. Read How to remove local (untracked) files from the current Git working tree? for information on how to remove all untracked files.

Be sure to not accidentally remove untracked file that you still need ;)


m
matt

Update - a better version

This tool (https://github.com/mklepaczewski/git-clean-before-merge) will:

delete untracked files that are identical to their git pull equivalents,

revert changes to modified files who's modified version is identical to their git pull equivalents,

report modified/untracked files that differ from their git pull version,

the tool has the --pretend option that will not modify any files.

Old version

How this answer differ from other answers?

The method presented here removes only files that would be overwritten by merge. If you have other untracked (possibly ignored) files in the directory this method won't remove them.

The solution

This snippet will extract all untracked files that would be overwritten by git pull and delete them.

git pull 2>&1|grep -E '^\s'|cut -f2-|xargs -I {} rm -rf "{}"

and then just do:

git pull

This is not git porcelain command so always double check what it would do with:

git pull 2>&1|grep -E '^\s'|cut -f2-|xargs -I {} echo "{}"

Explanation - because one liners are scary:

Here's a breakdown of what it does:

git pull 2>&1 - capture git pull output and redirect it all to stdout so we can easily capture it with grep. grep -E '^\s - the intent is to capture the list of the untracked files that would be overwritten by git pull. The filenames have a bunch of whitespace characters in front of them so we utilize it to get them. cut -f2- - remove whitespace from the beginning of each line captured in 2. xargs -I {} rm -rf "{}" - us xargs to iterate over all files, save their name in "{}" and call rm for each of them. We use -rf to force delete and remove untracked directories.

It would be great to replace steps 1-3 with porcelain command, but I'm not aware of any equivalent.


Thank you, I often have untracked files in my working directory that I don't want deleted or committed. In my case I needed to substitute git pull with git checkout <branch_name>
This was perfect especially when there's numerous files to not have to do it one by one, thank you!
M
Michał Szkudlarek

Neither clean/reset/hard checkout/rebase worked for me.

So I just removed files that git complained about*

rm /path/to/files/that/git/complained/about

*I checked if this files can be removed by checking out a brand new repo in a separate folder (files were not there)


This is the best/simplest answer. Crazy that there isn't an option in git merge to do this automatically.
Z
Zahin

The problem is when we have incoming changes that will merge untracked file, git complains. These commands helped me:

git clean -dxf
git pull origin master

Well this cleans my local bazel cache as well :)
to those considering this, see the many warnings about the x flag removing everything that's untracked.... you may delete a bunch of files with this
M
Maarten

If you consider using the -f flag you might first run it as a dry-run. Just that you know upfront what kind of interesting situation you will end up next ;-P

-n 
--dry-run 
    Don’t actually remove anything, just show what would be done.

M
MMM

In addition to the accepted answer you can of course remove the files if they are no longer needed by specifying the file:

git clean -f '/path/to/file/'

Remember to run it with the -n flag first if you would like to see which files git clean will remove. Note that these files will be deleted. In my case I didn't care about them anyway, so that was a better solution for me.


F
Forhadul Islam

One way to do this is by stashing you local changes and pulling from the remote repo. In this way, you will not lose your local files as the files will go to the stash.

git add -A
git stash
git pull

You can check your local stashed files using this command - git stash list


A
A. Davidson

For those who don't know, git ignores uppercase/lowercase name differences in files and folders. This turns out to be a nightmare when you rename them to the exact same name with a different case.

I encountered this issue when I renamed a folder from "Petstore" to "petstore" (uppercase to lowercase). I had edited my .git/config file to stop ignoring case, made changes, squashed my commits, and stashed my changes to move to a different branch. I could not apply my stashed changes to this other branch.

The fix that I found that worked was to temporarily edit my .git/config file to temporarily ignore case again. This caused git stash apply to succeed. Then, I changed ignoreCase back to false. I then added everything except for the new files in the petstore folder which git oddly claimed were deleted, for whatever reason. I committed my changes, then ran git reset --hard HEAD to get rid of those untracked new files. My commit appeared exactly as expected: the files in the folder were renamed.

I hope that this helps you avoid my same nightmare.


Didn't work for me. I deleted all files in the folder. Then git pull -f then git checkout .. What a nightmare.
Really? It worked fine for me just a few weeks ago. Did you try editing your gitconfig file to start/stop ignoring case as appropriate?
Thank you. I needed to merge from master after fixing the casing in the folder path. I was able to merge it with git ignore case on, after that I just re-enable the case sensitivity.
T
Tom Bush

In my case when I had this problem. I had a local file that I had renamed on the remote.

When trying to git pull Git told me the new filename was not tracked -- which it was on the remote although it didn't yet exist on local.

Because there was no instance of it locally I couldn't do git pull until I did git rm on the old filename (which wasn't obvious at first because of my stupid idea of renaming it).


u
uko akanowo

If you have the files written under .gitignore, remove the files and run git pull again. That helped me out.


V
VonC

The post Git 2.23 (Q3 2019) answer would not use the old and confusing git checkout command as in Esteis's answer.

You would use:

git switch to switch branches

git restore to restore files (illustrated here)

So:

Safely remove/overwrite only bothersome files

When you want to merge:

git switch -f receiving-branch # -f is an alias for --discard-changes.
git merge donor-branch         # merge works

When you want to pull:

git switch -f mybranch    # automatically track origin/mybranch
git pull

It avoids:

the git clean dangerous operation

the detached head like a git checkout origin/myBranch)

the explicit pull, since git switch has a guess mode which is the equivalent of git switch -c --track /. Meaning a simple git pull is then enough.


A
Ammar Mujeeb

I am having same issue, whenever I try to merge master in my local branch it says

"The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge M.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved"

But following any of the above answer didn't worked for me. As when I do git status theres no untracked file, so when I do git add . no file get staged hence stashing doesn't solve the problem nor force checkout as answered above.

I was able to solve by running following commands as mentioned above but more importantly I had to close the Xcode (as may be even after running the clean command it was creating the file that was causing issue for me.)

git clean -dfxn (to check what can be removed)

git clean -d -fx . (remove above listed files)