I see this code in this blog: Type-Level Programming in Scala:
// define the abstract types and bounds
trait Recurse {
type Next <: Recurse
// this is the recursive function definition
type X[R <: Recurse] <: Int
}
// implementation
trait RecurseA extends Recurse {
type Next = RecurseA
// this is the implementation
type X[R <: Recurse] = R#X[R#Next]
}
object Recurse {
// infinite loop
type C = RecurseA#X[RecurseA]
}
There is an operator #
in the code R#X[R#Next]
which I've never seen. Since it's difficult to search it(ignored by search engines), who can tell me what does it mean?
To explain it, we first have to explain nested classes in Scala. Consider this simple example:
class A {
class B
def f(b: B) = println("Got my B!")
}
Now let's try something with it:
scala> val a1 = new A
a1: A = A@2fa8ecf4
scala> val a2 = new A
a2: A = A@4bed4c8
scala> a2.f(new a1.B)
<console>:11: error: type mismatch;
found : a1.B
required: a2.B
a2.f(new a1.B)
^
When you declare a class inside another class in Scala, you are saying that each instance of that class has such a subclass. In other words, there's no A.B
class, but there are a1.B
and a2.B
classes, and they are different classes, as the error message is telling us above.
If you did not understand that, look up path dependent types.
Now, #
makes it possible for you to refer to such nested classes without restricting it to a particular instance. In other words, there's no A.B
, but there's A#B
, which means a B
nested class of any instance of A
.
We can see this in work by changing the code above:
class A {
class B
def f(b: B) = println("Got my B!")
def g(b: A#B) = println("Got a B.")
}
And trying it out:
scala> val a1 = new A
a1: A = A@1497b7b1
scala> val a2 = new A
a2: A = A@2607c28c
scala> a2.f(new a1.B)
<console>:11: error: type mismatch;
found : a1.B
required: a2.B
a2.f(new a1.B)
^
scala> a2.g(new a1.B)
Got a B.
It's known as type projection, and is used to access type members.
scala> trait R {
| type A = Int
| }
defined trait R
scala> val x = null.asInstanceOf[R#A]
x: Int = 0
Basically, it's a way of referring to classes within other classes.
http://jim-mcbeath.blogspot.com/2008/09/scala-syntax-primer.html (search for "pound")
Here's a resource for searching on "symbolic operators" (which are really methods), but I haven't figured out how to escape "#" to search on in scalex)
http://www.artima.com/pins1ed/book-index.html#indexanchor
Success story sharing
Class
is a runtime representation of Java classes, and it's limited even in Java. For example,List<String>
andList<Integer>
have the same runtimeClass
. IfClass
is not rich enough to represent Java types, it's almost useless when representing Scala types. Again,res7: Class[A#B] = class A$B
, left of the equals sign is a type, right of the equals type if a value which is the Java runtime representation of a class.