ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

What is the `self` parameter in class methods?

self refers to the specific object instance created from a class. But why must every method explicitly include self as a parameter?

class MyClass:
    def func(self, name):
        self.name = name

Conversely, in Ruby, there is no self:

class MyClass
    def func(name)
        @name = name
    end
end
You may find interesting this essay "Why explicit self has to stay" by Guido van Rossum: neopythonic.blogspot.com/2008/10/…
See also "Why must 'self' be used explicitly in method definitions and calls": docs.python.org/faq/…
"Which i understand, quite easily" --- Quite subjective, don't you think? What makes @name more intuitive than self.name? The latter, IMO, is more intuitive.
Although to play devils advocate its very easy to forget to add an additional argument to each method and have bizarre behavior when you forget which makes it hard for beginners. IMHO I rather be specific about unusual things like static methods then normal behavior like instance methods.
That's the key difference between a function and a class method. A function is floating free, unencumbered. A class (instance) method has to be aware of it's parent (and parent properties) so you need to pass the method a reference to the parent class (as self). It's just one less implicit rule that you have to internalize before understanding OOP. Other languages choose syntactic sugar over semantic simplicity, python isn't other languages.

T
Thomas Wouters

The reason you need to use self. is because Python does not use the @ syntax to refer to instance attributes. Python decided to do methods in a way that makes the instance to which the method belongs be passed automatically, but not received automatically: the first parameter of methods is the instance the method is called on. That makes methods entirely the same as functions, and leaves the actual name to use up to you (although self is the convention, and people will generally frown at you when you use something else.) self is not special to the code, it's just another object.

Python could have done something else to distinguish normal names from attributes -- special syntax like Ruby has, or requiring declarations like C++ and Java do, or perhaps something yet more different -- but it didn't. Python's all for making things explicit, making it obvious what's what, and although it doesn't do it entirely everywhere, it does do it for instance attributes. That's why assigning to an instance attribute needs to know what instance to assign to, and that's why it needs self..


@Georg: cls refers to the class object, not instance object
@SilentGhost: Actually, the name of the first parameter is whatever you want it to be. On class methods, the convention is to use cls and self is used conventionally for instance methods. If I wanted, I could use self for classmethods and cls for instance methods. I could also use bob and fnord if I liked.
I find it interesting that the community didn't choose this instead of self. Does self have some history that I'm not aware of in older programming languages?
@Julius The self came from Modula-3's conventions, see this answer for further details on this choice. (Disclaimer: its mine).
@Julius The self keyword (Smalltalk, 1980) predates the this keyword (from C++). See: stackoverflow.com/questions/1079983/…
A
Arjun Sreedharan

Let's say you have a class ClassA which contains a method methodA defined as:

def methodA(self, arg1, arg2):
    # do something

and ObjectA is an instance of this class.

Now when ObjectA.methodA(arg1, arg2) is called, python internally converts it for you as:

ClassA.methodA(ObjectA, arg1, arg2)

The self variable refers to the object itself.


I read all the other answers and sort of understood, I read this one and then it all made sense.
Why not keep those guts inside, though, like Ruby does?
But in __init__(self) method, it accepts self, then even without creating the object, how does it refer to itself?
This doesn't answer the question though. The OP was asking about why self has to be explicitly defined.
e
empty

Let’s take a simple vector class:

class Vector:
    def __init__(self, x, y):
        self.x = x
        self.y = y

We want to have a method which calculates the length. What would it look like if we wanted to define it inside the class?

    def length(self):
        return math.sqrt(self.x ** 2 + self.y ** 2)

What should it look like when we were to define it as a global method/function?

def length_global(vector):
    return math.sqrt(vector.x ** 2 + vector.y ** 2)

So the whole structure stays the same. How can me make use of this? If we assume for a moment that we hadn’t written a length method for our Vector class, we could do this:

Vector.length_new = length_global
v = Vector(3, 4)
print(v.length_new()) # 5.0

This works because the first parameter of length_global, can be re-used as the self parameter in length_new. This would not be possible without an explicit self.

Another way of understanding the need for the explicit self is to see where Python adds some syntactical sugar. When you keep in mind, that basically, a call like

v_instance.length()

is internally transformed to

Vector.length(v_instance)

it is easy to see where the self fits in. You don't actually write instance methods in Python; what you write is class methods which must take an instance as a first parameter. And therefore, you’ll have to place the instance parameter somewhere explicitly.


Vector.length_new = length_global... I actually started to use syntax like this in my class declarations. Whenever I only want to inherit some of the methods from another class, I just explicitly copy the reference to the methods.
would it be fair to say that python's "instance method" is simply a syntactic sugar of static global methods (as in Java or C++) with an instance object passed in to package multiple attributes? --- well this is kind of half-true since in polymorphism, the more important purpose of "this" (as in java) or "self" is to give u the correct implementation of methods. Python does have this. so calling myobj.someMethod() is equal to TheClassOfMyObj.someMethod(myobj) in python. note that the "TheClassOfMyObj" is automatically figured out by python from "self", otherwise u'd have to find that out.
Infact, not only are instance methods just class methods, but methods are just functions which are members of a class, as the Vector.length_new = length_global shows.
"This works, because the first parameter of length_global, can be re-used as the self parameter in length_new. This would not be possible without an explicit self." - it would work just the same. it would be re-used for the implicit self... the second example is a circular reasoning - you have to explicitly place self there, because python needs the explicit self.
@KarolyHorvath: Sure, it would also be possible to have a language with a model where internally defined methods do not need an explicit self but externally defined methods do. But I’d say there is some consistency in requiring the explicit self in both cases, which makes it a legitimate reason to do it this way. Other languages may choose different approaches.
s
sw123456

When objects are instantiated, the object itself is passed into the self parameter.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/whCZm.png

Because of this, the object’s data is bound to the object. Below is an example of how you might like to visualize what each object’s data might look. Notice how ‘self’ is replaced with the objects name. I'm not saying this example diagram below is wholly accurate but it hopefully with serve a purpose in visualizing the use of self.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/5daR6.png

The Object is passed into the self parameter so that the object can keep hold of its own data.

Although this may not be wholly accurate, think of the process of instantiating an object like this: When an object is made it uses the class as a template for its own data and methods. Without passing it's own name into the self parameter, the attributes and methods in the class would remain as a general template and would not be referenced to (belong to) the object. So by passing the object's name into the self parameter it means that if 100 objects are instantiated from the one class, they can all keep track of their own data and methods.

See the illustration below:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/oZZe5.png


Hey there, when accessing Bob's attributes for example by "bob.name()", you actually accesing bob().self.name so to speak from the 'init' right?
When you write bob.name() in the above comment, you are implying that bob has a method called name() due to the fact that you added brackets after name. In this example however there is no such method. 'bob.name' (which has no parenthesis) is directly accessing the attribute called name from the init (constructor) method. When bob's speak method is called it is the method which accesses the name attribute and returns it in a print statement. Hope this helps.
No, you get the value of self.name, which for the bob object is actually bob.name, because the object's name is passed into the self parameter when it is created (instantiated). Again, hope this helps. Feel free to upvote main post if it has.
Name is assigned to self.name at instantiation. After an object is created, all variables that belong to the object are those prefixed with 'self.' Remember that self is replaced with the object's name when it is created from the class.
This is how you explain stuff ! nice job :)
k
kame

I like this example:

class A: 
    foo = []
a, b = A(), A()
a.foo.append(5)
b.foo
ans: [5]

class A: 
    def __init__(self): 
        self.foo = []
a, b = A(), A()
a.foo.append(5)
b.foo
ans: []

so vars without self is simply static vars of the class, like in java
teddy teddy, you aren't entirely correct. The behavior (static or non-static like) depends not only on self but also on the variable type. Try to do the first example with simple integer instead of list. The result would be quite different.
Actually, my question with this is why are you allowed to say a.foo in the first example, rather than A.foo? Clearly foo belongs to the class...
You can call static members from instances of the object in most languages. Why is that surprising?
@RadonRosborough Because in the first example, a and b are both labels (or pointers) for A() (the class). a.foo references the A().foo class method. In the second example, though, a becomes a reference to an instance of A(), as does b. Now that they are instances instead of the class object itself, self allows the foo method to operate on the instances.
n
ninjagecko

I will demonstrate with code that does not use classes:

def state_init(state):
    state['field'] = 'init'

def state_add(state, x):
    state['field'] += x

def state_mult(state, x):
    state['field'] *= x

def state_getField(state):
    return state['field']

myself = {}
state_init(myself)
state_add(myself, 'added')
state_mult(myself, 2)

print( state_getField(myself) )
#--> 'initaddedinitadded'

Classes are just a way to avoid passing in this "state" thing all the time (and other nice things like initializing, class composition, the rarely-needed metaclasses, and supporting custom methods to override operators).

Now let's demonstrate the above code using the built-in python class machinery, to show how it's basically the same thing.

class State(object):
    def __init__(self):
        self.field = 'init'
    def add(self, x):
        self.field += x
    def mult(self, x):
        self.field *= x

s = State()
s.add('added')    # self is implicitly passed in
s.mult(2)         # self is implicitly passed in
print( s.field )

[migrated my answer from duplicate closed question]


I wish Python sugarcoated the handlers as well as Ruby does.
C
Community

The following excerpts are from the Python documentation about self:

As in Modula-3, there are no shorthands [in Python] for referencing the object’s members from its methods: the method function is declared with an explicit first argument representing the object, which is provided implicitly by the call. Often, the first argument of a method is called self. This is nothing more than a convention: the name self has absolutely no special meaning to Python. Note, however, that by not following the convention your code may be less readable to other Python programmers, and it is also conceivable that a class browser program might be written that relies upon such a convention.

For more information, see the Python documentation tutorial on classes.


R
Ry-

As well as all the other reasons already stated, it allows for easier access to overridden methods; you can call Class.some_method(inst).

An example of where it’s useful:

class C1(object):
    def __init__(self):
         print "C1 init"

class C2(C1):
    def __init__(self): #overrides C1.__init__
        print "C2 init"
        C1.__init__(self) #but we still want C1 to init the class too
>>> C2()
"C2 init"
"C1 init"

C
ChickenFeet

Its use is similar to the use of this keyword in Java, i.e. to give a reference to the current object.


class myClass: def myFunc(this, name): this.name = name
r
rassa45

Python is not a language built for Object Oriented Programming unlike Java or C++.

When calling a static method in Python, one simply writes a method with regular arguments inside it.

class Animal():
    def staticMethod():
        print "This is a static method"

However, an object method, which requires you to make a variable, which is an Animal, in this case, needs the self argument

class Animal():
    def objectMethod(self):
        print "This is an object method which needs an instance of a class"

The self method is also used to refer to a variable field within the class.

class Animal():
    #animalName made in constructor
    def Animal(self):
        self.animalName = "";


    def getAnimalName(self):
        return self.animalName

In this case, self is referring to the animalName variable of the entire class. REMEMBER: If you have a variable within a method, self will not work. That variable is simply existent only while that method is running. For defining fields (the variables of the entire class), you have to define them OUTSIDE the class methods.

If you don't understand a single word of what I am saying, then Google "Object Oriented Programming." Once you understand this, you won't even need to ask that question :).


+1 because of the distinction between staticMethod() and objectMethod(self). I would like to add that in order to invoke the first, you would say Animal.staticMethod(), while objectMethod() needs an instance: a = Animal(); a.objectMethod()
What you are saying isn't 100% true. That's just a convention. You can still call the static method from an object created. You just won't be able to use any class members because you didn't declare a self. I can even call Animal.objectMethod(animalObj) to call the non static. Basically this means a static method is only a method that doesn't use member variables. There shouldn't be any need to declare self. It's a silly language requirement I think. Languages like Lua and C++ give you obj variables behind the scenes.
You made a useless animalName string declaration and crashing animalName method.
@ytpillai Irrelevant. Confusing and incorrect code should not be presented as an answer.
def getAnimalName to not clobber the string you're trying to return, and self refers to the instance of the class, not any field inside of it.
A
Akash Kandpal

First of all, self is a conventional name, you could put anything else (being coherent) in its stead.

It refers to the object itself, so when you are using it, you are declaring that .name and .age are properties of the Student objects (note, not of the Student class) you are going to create.

class Student:
    #called each time you create a new Student instance
    def __init__(self,name,age): #special method to initialize
        self.name=name
        self.age=age

    def __str__(self): #special method called for example when you use print
        return "Student %s is %s years old" %(self.name,self.age)

    def call(self, msg): #silly example for custom method
        return ("Hey, %s! "+msg) %self.name

#initializing two instances of the student class
bob=Student("Bob",20)
alice=Student("Alice",19)

#using them
print bob.name
print bob.age
print alice #this one only works if you define the __str__ method
print alice.call("Come here!") #notice you don't put a value for self

#you can modify attributes, like when alice ages
alice.age=20
print alice

Code is here


M
Ming-Tang

self is an object reference to the object itself, therefore, they are same. Python methods are not called in the context of the object itself. self in Python may be used to deal with custom object models or something.


R
Ry-

It’s there to follow the Python zen “explicit is better than implicit”. It’s indeed a reference to your class object. In Java and PHP, for example, it's called this.

If user_type_name is a field on your model you access it by self.user_type_name.


u
user441521

I'm surprised nobody has brought up Lua. Lua also uses the 'self' variable however it can be omitted but still used. C++ does the same with 'this'. I don't see any reason to have to declare 'self' in each function but you should still be able to use it just like you can with lua and C++. For a language that prides itself on being brief it's odd that it requires you to declare the self variable.


B
Bugs Buggy

The use of the argument, conventionally called self isn't as hard to understand, as is why is it necessary? Or as to why explicitly mention it? That, I suppose, is a bigger question for most users who look up this question, or if it is not, they will certainly have the same question as they move forward learning python. I recommend them to read these couple of blogs:

1: Use of self explained

Note that it is not a keyword.

The first argument of every class method, including init, is always a reference to the current instance of the class. By convention, this argument is always named self. In the init method, self refers to the newly created object; in other class methods, it refers to the instance whose method was called. For example the below code is the same as the above code.

2: Why do we have it this way and why can we not eliminate it as an argument, like Java, and have a keyword instead

Another thing I would like to add is, an optional self argument allows me to declare static methods inside a class, by not writing self.

Code examples:

class MyClass():
    def staticMethod():
        print "This is a static method"

    def objectMethod(self):
        print "This is an object method which needs an instance of a class, and that is what self refers to"

PS:This works only in Python 3.x.

In previous versions, you have to explicitly add @staticmethod decorator, otherwise self argument is obligatory.


k
kmario23

Take a look at the following example, which clearly explains the purpose of self

class Restaurant(object):  
    bankrupt = False

    def open_branch(self):
        if not self.bankrupt:
           print("branch opened")

#create instance1
>>> x = Restaurant()
>>> x.bankrupt
False

#create instance2
>>> y = Restaurant()
>>> y.bankrupt = True   
>>> y.bankrupt
True

>>> x.bankrupt
False  

self is used/needed to distinguish between instances.

Source: self variable in python explained - Pythontips


Yes, I think we know why self is used, but the question is why does the language make you explicitly declare it. Many other languages don't require this and a language which prides itself on being brief, you'd think they would just give you the variable behind the scenes to use like Lua or C++ (this) does.
@kmario23 You're response was from here: pythontips.com/2013/08/07/the-self-variable-in-python-explained Please always acknowledge original authors when posting answers as your own.
s
skyking

Is because by the way python is designed the alternatives would hardly work. Python is designed to allow methods or functions to be defined in a context where both implicit this (a-la Java/C++) or explicit @ (a-la ruby) wouldn't work. Let's have an example with the explicit approach with python conventions:

def fubar(x):
    self.x = x

class C:
    frob = fubar

Now the fubar function wouldn't work since it would assume that self is a global variable (and in frob as well). The alternative would be to execute method's with a replaced global scope (where self is the object).

The implicit approach would be

def fubar(x)
    myX = x

class C:
    frob = fubar

This would mean that myX would be interpreted as a local variable in fubar (and in frob as well). The alternative here would be to execute methods with a replaced local scope which is retained between calls, but that would remove the posibility of method local variables.

However the current situation works out well:

 def fubar(self, x)
     self.x = x

 class C:
     frob = fubar

here when called as a method frob will receive the object on which it's called via the self parameter, and fubar can still be called with an object as parameter and work the same (it is the same as C.frob I think).


C
Community

In the __init__ method, self refers to the newly created object; in other class methods, it refers to the instance whose method was called.

self, as a name, is just a convention, call it as you want ! but when using it, for example to delete the object, you have to use the same name: __del__(var), where var was used in the __init__(var,[...])

You should take a look at cls too, to have the bigger picture. This post could be helpful.


s
sameer_nubia

self is acting as like current object name or instance of class .

# Self explanation.


 class classname(object):

    def __init__(self,name):

        self.name=name
        # Self is acting as a replacement of object name.
        #self.name=object1.name

   def display(self):
      print("Name of the person is :",self.name)
      print("object name:",object1.name)


 object1=classname("Bucky")
 object2=classname("ford")

 object1.display()
 object2.display()

###### Output 
Name of the person is : Bucky
object name: Bucky
Name of the person is : ford
object name: Bucky

p
prosti

self is inevitable.

There was just a question should self be implicit or explicit. Guido van Rossum resolved this question saying self has to stay.

So where the self live?

If we would just stick to functional programming we would not need self. Once we enter the Python OOP we find self there.

Here is the typical use case class C with the method m1

class C:
    def m1(self, arg):
        print(self, ' inside')
        pass

ci =C()
print(ci, ' outside')
ci.m1(None)
print(hex(id(ci))) # hex memory address

This program will output:

<__main__.C object at 0x000002B9D79C6CC0>  outside
<__main__.C object at 0x000002B9D79C6CC0>  inside
0x2b9d79c6cc0

So self holds the memory address of the class instance. The purpose of self would be to hold the reference for instance methods and for us to have explicit access to that reference.

Note there are three different types of class methods:

static methods (read: functions),

class methods,

instance methods (mentioned).


R
Rahul Jha

"self" keyword holds the reference of class and it is upto you if you want to use it or not but if you notice, whenever you create a new method in python, python automatically write self keyword for you. If you do some R&D, you will notice that if you create say two methods in a class and try to call one inside another, it does not recognize method unless you add self (reference of class).

class testA:
def __init__(self):
    print('ads')
def m1(self):
    print('method 1')
    self.m2()
def m2(self):
    print('method 2')

Below code throws unresolvable reference error.

class testA:
def __init__(self):
    print('ads')
def m1(self):
    print('method 1')
    m2()  #throws unresolvable reference error as class does not know if m2 exist in class scope
def m2(self):
    print('method 2')

Now let see below example

class testA:
def __init__(self):
    print('ads')
def m1(self):
    print('method 1')
def m2():
    print('method 2')

Now when you create object of class testA, you can call method m1() using class object like this as method m1() has included self keyword

obj = testA()
obj.m1()

But if you want to call method m2(), because is has no self reference so you can call m2() directly using class name like below

testA.m2()

But keep in practice to live with self keyword as there are other benefits too of it like creating global variable inside and so on.


P
PrabhavDevo

The word 'self' refers to instance of a class

class foo:
      def __init__(self, num1, num2):
             self.n1 = num1 #now in this it will make the perimeter num1 and num2 access across the whole class
             self.n2 = num2
      def add(self):
             return self.n1 + self.n2 # if we had not written self then if would throw an error that n1 and n2 is not defined and we have to include self in the function's perimeter to access it's variables

S
SilentGhost

it's an explicit reference to the class instance object.


I don't think this helps richzilla to understand the reason behind it.
@SilentGhost: you have nailed it. I am impressed. if I understand it correctly: I do create an object as an instance of the defined class and the self parameter refers to that object? I understand self refers in implicit way to the class itself but it would be great if you explain your answer a bit more.
l
laxman

from the docs,

the special thing about methods is that the instance object is passed as the first argument of the function. In our example, the call x.f() is exactly equivalent to MyClass.f(x). In general, calling a method with a list of n arguments is equivalent to calling the corresponding function with an argument list that is created by inserting the method’s instance object before the first argument.

preceding this the related snippet,

class MyClass:
    """A simple example class"""
    i = 12345

    def f(self):
        return 'hello world'

x = MyClass()


R
Rishi

I would say for Python at least, the self parameter can be thought of as a placeholder. Take a look at this:

class Person:
  def __init__(self, name, age):
    self.name = name
    self.age = age

p1 = Person("John", 36)

print(p1.name)
print(p1.age)

Self in this case and a lot of others was used as a method to say store the name value. However, after that, we use the p1 to assign it to the class we're using. Then when we print it we use the same p1 keyword.

Hope this helps for Python!


s
saran

my little 2 cents

In this class Person, we defined out init method with the self and interesting thing to notice here is the memory location of both the self and instance variable p is same <__main__.Person object at 0x106a78fd0>

class Person:

    def __init__(self, name, age):
        self.name = name 
        self.age = age 

    def say_hi(self):
        print("the self is at:", self)
        print((f"hey there, my name is {self.name} and I am {self.age} years old"))

    def say_bye(self):
        print("the self is at:", self)
        print(f"good to see you {self.name}")

p = Person("john", 78)
print("the p is at",p)
p.say_hi()  
p.say_bye() 

so as explained in above, both self and instance variable are same object.