I have to run a local shell script (windows/Linux) on a remote machine.
I have SSH configured on both machine A and B. My script is on machine A which will run some of my code on a remote machine, machine B.
The local and remote computers can be either Windows or Unix based system.
Is there a way to run do this using plink/ssh?
If Machine A is a Windows box, you can use Plink (part of PuTTY) with the -m parameter, and it will execute the local script on the remote server.
plink root@MachineB -m local_script.sh
If Machine A is a Unix-based system, you can use:
ssh root@MachineB 'bash -s' < local_script.sh
You shouldn't have to copy the script to the remote server to run it.
This is an old question, and Jason's answer works fine, but I would like to add this:
ssh user@host <<'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ENDSSH
This can also be used with su and commands which require user input. (note the '
escaped heredoc)
Since this answer keeps getting bits of traffic, I would add even more info to this wonderful use of heredoc:
You can nest commands with this syntax, and that's the only way nesting seems to work (in a sane way)
ssh user@host <<'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ssh user@host2 <<'END2'
# Another bunch of commands on another host
wall <<'ENDWALL'
Error: Out of cheese
ENDWALL
ftp ftp.example.com <<'ENDFTP'
test
test
ls
ENDFTP
END2
ENDSSH
You can actually have a conversation with some services like telnet, ftp, etc. But remember that heredoc just sends the stdin as text, it doesn't wait for response between lines
I just found out that you can indent the insides with tabs if you use <<-END
!
ssh user@host <<-'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ssh user@host2 <<-'END2'
# Another bunch of commands on another host
wall <<-'ENDWALL'
Error: Out of cheese
ENDWALL
ftp ftp.example.com <<-'ENDFTP'
test
test
ls
ENDFTP
END2
ENDSSH
(I think this should work)
Also see http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/here-docs.html
<<'ENDSSH'
), the strings will not be expanded, variables will not be evaluated. You can also use <<ENDSSH
or <<"ENDSSH"
if you want expansion.
Expect
can be used when you need to automate interactive commands like FTP.
Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.
message. One has to use ssh with -t -t
params to avoid that. See this thread on SO
Also, don't forget to escape variables if you want to pick them up from the destination host.
This has caught me out in the past.
For example:
user@host> ssh user2@host2 "echo \$HOME"
prints out /home/user2
while
user@host> ssh user2@host2 "echo $HOME"
prints out /home/user
Another example:
user@host> ssh user2@host2 "echo hello world | awk '{print \$1}'"
prints out "hello" correctly.
ssh user2@host 'bash -s' echo $HOME /home/user2 exit
for
loops running in ssh
session the loop variable must not be escaped.
ssh user2@host2 'echo hello world' | awk '{ print $1 }'
i.e. run the Awk script locally. If the remote command produces an immense about of output, you want to avoid copying it all back to the local server, of course. Incidentally, single quotes around the remote command avoid the need for any escaping.
This is an extension to YarekT's answer to combine inline remote commands with passing ENV variables from the local machine to the remote host so you can parameterize your scripts on the remote side:
ssh user@host ARG1=$ARG1 ARG2=$ARG2 'bash -s' <<'ENDSSH'
# commands to run on remote host
echo $ARG1 $ARG2
ENDSSH
I found this exceptionally helpful by keeping it all in one script so it's very readable and maintainable.
Why this works. ssh supports the following syntax:
ssh user@host remote_command
In bash we can specify environment variables to define prior to running a command on a single line like so:
ENV_VAR_1='value1' ENV_VAR_2='value2' bash -c 'echo $ENV_VAR_1 $ENV_VAR_2'
That makes it easy to define variables prior to running a command. In this case echo is our command we're running. Everything before echo defines environment variables.
So we combine those two features and YarekT's answer to get:
ssh user@host ARG1=$ARG1 ARG2=$ARG2 'bash -s' <<'ENDSSH'...
In this case we are setting ARG1 and ARG2 to local values. Sending everything after user@host as the remote_command. When the remote machine executes the command ARG1 and ARG2 are set the local values, thanks to local command line evaluation, which defines environment variables on the remote server, then executes the bash -s command using those variables. Voila.
ssh user@host "ARG1=\"$ARG1\" ARG2=\"$ARG2\"" 'bash -s' <<'ENDSSH'...
-s
is to be able to apply arguments to scripts that are sourced through stdin. I mean, you may as well omit it if you're not going to use it. If you do use it, there is no reason to use environment variables: ssh user@host 'bash -s value1 value2' <<< 'echo "$@"'
<hostA_shell_prompt>$ ssh user@hostB "ls -la"
That will prompt you for password, unless you have copied your hostA user's public key to the authorized_keys file on the home of user .ssh's directory. That will allow for passwordless authentication (if accepted as an auth method on the ssh server's configuration)
I've started using Fabric for more sophisticated operations. Fabric requires Python and a couple of other dependencies, but only on the client machine. The server need only be a ssh server. I find this tool to be much more powerful than shell scripts handed off to SSH, and well worth the trouble of getting set up (particularly if you enjoy programming in Python). Fabric handles running scripts on multiple hosts (or hosts of certain roles), helps facilitate idempotent operations (such as adding a line to a config script, but not if it's already there), and allows construction of more complex logic (such as the Python language can provide).
cat ./script.sh | ssh <user>@<host>
Try running ssh user@remote sh ./script.unx
.
chmod +x script.sh
ssh -i key-file root@111.222.3.444 < ./script.sh
Assuming you mean you want to do this automatically from a "local" machine, without manually logging into the "remote" machine, you should look into a TCL extension known as Expect, it is designed precisely for this sort of situation. I've also provided a link to a script for logging-in/interacting via SSH.
https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/expect
http://bash.cyberciti.biz/security/expect-ssh-login-script/
I use this one to run a shell script on a remote machine (tested on /bin/bash):
ssh deploy@host . /home/deploy/path/to/script.sh
ssh user@hostname ". ~/.bashrc;/cd path-to-file/;. filename.sh"
highly recommended to source the environment file(.bashrc/.bashprofile/.profile). before running something in remote host because target and source hosts environment variables may be deffer.
if you wanna execute command like this temp=`ls -a` echo $temp
command in `` will cause errors.
below command will solve this problem ssh user@host ''' temp=`ls -a` echo $temp '''
If the script is short and is meant to be embedded inside your script and you are running under bash
shell and also bash
shell is available on the remote side, you may use declare
to transfer local context to remote. Define variables and functions containing the state that will be transferred to the remote. Define a function that will be executed on the remote side. Then inside a here document read by bash -s
you can use declare -p
to transfer the variable values and use declare -f
to transfer function definitions to the remote.
Because declare
takes care of the quoting and will be parsed by the remote bash
, the variables are properly quoted and functions are properly transferred. You may just write the script locally, usually I do one long function with the work I need to do on the remote side. The context has to be hand-picked, but the following method is "good enough" for any short scripts and is safe - should properly handle all corner cases.
somevar="spaces or other special characters"
somevar2="!@#$%^"
another_func() {
mkdir -p "$1"
}
work() {
another_func "$somevar"
touch "$somevar"/"$somevar2"
}
ssh user@server 'bash -s' <<EOT
$(declare -p somevar somevar2) # transfer variables values
$(declare -f work another_func) # transfer function definitions
work # call the function
EOT
The answer here (https://stackoverflow.com/a/2732991/4752883) works great if you're trying to run a script on a remote linux machine using plink
or ssh
. It will work if the script has multiple lines on linux
.
**However, if you are trying to run a batch script located on a local linux/windows
machine and your remote machine is Windows
, and it consists of multiple lines using **
plink root@MachineB -m local_script.bat
wont work.
Only the first line of the script will be executed. This is probably a limitation of plink
.
Solution 1:
To run a multiline batch script (especially if it's relatively simple, consisting of a few lines):
If your original batch script is as follows
cd C:\Users\ipython_user\Desktop
python filename.py
you can combine the lines together using the "&&" separator as follows in your local_script.bat
file: https://stackoverflow.com/a/8055390/4752883:
cd C:\Users\ipython_user\Desktop && python filename.py
After this change, you can then run the script as pointed out here by @JasonR.Coombs: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2732991/4752883 with:
`plink root@MachineB -m local_script.bat`
Solution 2:
If your batch script is relatively complicated, it may be better to use a batch script which encapsulates the plink command as well as follows as pointed out here by @Martin https://stackoverflow.com/a/32196999/4752883:
rem Open tunnel in the background
start plink.exe -ssh [username]@[hostname] -L 3307:127.0.0.1:3306 -i "[SSH
key]" -N
rem Wait a second to let Plink establish the tunnel
timeout /t 1
rem Run the task using the tunnel
"C:\Program Files\R\R-3.2.1\bin\x64\R.exe" CMD BATCH qidash.R
rem Kill the tunnel
taskkill /im plink.exe
This bash script does ssh into a target remote machine, and run some command in the remote machine, do not forget to install expect before running it (on mac brew install expect
)
#!/usr/bin/expect
set username "enterusenamehere"
set password "enterpasswordhere"
set hosts "enteripaddressofhosthere"
spawn ssh $username@$hosts
expect "$username@$hosts's password:"
send -- "$password\n"
expect "$"
send -- "somecommand on target remote machine here\n"
sleep 5
expect "$"
send -- "exit\n"
You can use runoverssh:
sudo apt install runoverssh
runoverssh -s localscript.sh user host1 host2 host3...
-s
runs a local script remotely
Useful flags:
-g
use a global password for all hosts (single password prompt)
-n
use SSH instead of sshpass, useful for public-key authentication
If it's one script it's fine with the above solution.
I would set up Ansible to do the Job. It works in the same way (Ansible uses ssh to execute the scripts on the remote machine for both Unix or Windows).
It will be more structured and maintainable.
It is unclear if the local script uses locally set variables, functions, or aliases.
If it does this should work:
myscript.sh:
#!/bin/bash
myalias $myvar
myfunction $myvar
It uses $myvar
, myfunction
, and myalias
. Let us assume they is set locally and not on the remote machine.
Make a bash function that contains the script:
eval "myfun() { `cat myscript.sh`; }"
Set variable, function, and alias:
myvar=works
alias myalias='echo This alias'
myfunction() { echo This function "$@"; }
And "export" myfun
, myfunction
, myvar
, and myalias
to server
using env_parallel
from GNU Parallel:
env_parallel -S server -N0 --nonall myfun ::: dummy
First, copy the script over to Machine B using scp
[user@machineA]$ scp /path/to/script user@machineB:/home/user/path
Then, just run the script
[user@machineA]$ ssh user@machineB "/home/user/path/script"
This will work if you have given executable permission to the script.
Success story sharing
-s
option? this man page leads me to believe that it will process standard input when it's done processing options, whether-s
is used or not.sudo
, runssh root@MachineB 'echo "rootpass" | sudo -Sv && bash -s' < local_script.sh
.ssh root@MachineB ARG1="arg1" ARG2="arg2" 'bash -s' < local_script.sh
Credits fully go to @chubbsondubs' answer below.-s
is to be able to pass arguments to a script that is sourced through stdin:ssh root@MachineB 'bash -s arg1 arg2' < local_script.sh
. Omitting-s
would causearg1
to be interpreted as the remote script to execute witharg2
as its first argument. There is no need to use environment variables.