I'm a bit miffed by the python package installation process. Specifically, what's the difference between packages installed in the dist-packages directory and the site-packages directory?
dist-packages
is a Debian-specific convention that is also present in its derivatives, like Ubuntu. Modules are installed to dist-packages
when they come from the Debian package manager into this location:
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
Since easy_install
and pip
are installed from the package manager, they also use dist-packages
, but they put packages here:
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
From the Debian Python Wiki:
dist-packages instead of site-packages. Third party Python software installed from Debian packages goes into dist-packages, not site-packages. This is to reduce conflict between the system Python, and any from-source Python build you might install manually.
This means that if you manually compile and install Python interpreter from source, it uses the site-packages
directory. This allows you to keep the two installations separate, especially since Debian and Ubuntu rely on the system version of Python for many system utilities.
dist-packages
is the debian-specific directory where apt
and friends install their stuff, and site-packages
is the standard pip
directory.
The problem is -- what happens when different versions of the same package are present in different directories?
My solution to the problem is to make dist-packages
a symlink to site-packages
:
for d in $(find $WORKON_HOME -type d -name dist-packages); do
pushd $d
cd ..
if test -d dist-packages/__pycache__; then
mv -v dist-packages/__pycache__/* site-packages/__pycache__/
rmdir -v dist-packages/__pycache__
fi
mv -v dist-packages/* site-packages/
rmdir -v dist-packages
ln -sv site-packages dist-packages
popd
done
(if you are not using gnu tools, remove the -v
option).
apt update
on Debian and new python packages get installed in dist-packages
? You have a dist-packages cleaner
, go for a patent..
dist-packages
: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages
and /usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages
, should I make one of it?
__pycache__
extra using if
? I would copy it in one go, no need for if
.
Debian (and Ubuntu) has introduced its own convention
# python3 -m site
on Ubuntu Focal gives
sys.path = [
'/qpid-dispatch',
'/usr/lib/python38.zip',
'/usr/lib/python3.8',
'/usr/lib/python3.8/lib-dynload',
'/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages',
'/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages',
]
USER_BASE: '/root/.local' (doesn't exist)
USER_SITE: '/root/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages' (doesn't exist)
ENABLE_USER_SITE: True
The convention, as described in the linked mailing list, is that python deb packages installed by the distribution package manager go into /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages
and packages installed using sudo pip3
go into /usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages
.
If you compile and install your own Python interpreter, it will default to placing itself in /usr/local
, with /usr/local/bin/pip3
installs going into /usr/local/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages
.
The point of the Debian convention is to keep the three sets of packages separate:
python packages installed by apt packages installed by root user with /usr/bin/pip3 packages installed by root user with their own /usr/local/bin/pip3
Success story sharing